Importance of imagery modalities when reproducing simple body configurations;Importance des modalités d'imagerie dans la reproduction de configurations corporelles simples

Science et Motricite

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 67-78

  Robin, Nicolas ^a   Toussaint, Lucette ^a   Blandin, Yannick ^a  

^a MSHS   (France)

Author keywords

Body configurations; Imagery modalities; Mental practice; Motor control

Indexed keywords

EID: 68649097619     PISSN: 13781863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3917/sm.057.78     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ADAMS, J. A., GOPHER, D., & LINTERN, G. (1977). Effects of visual and proprioceptive feedback on motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 9, 11-22.
2. CADOPI, M. (1980). L'élaboration de la référence interne dans une morphocinèse: relations entre les représentations visuelles et les représentations kinesthésiques. Cahiers de Psychologie, 23, 87-95.
3. CADOPI, M. (1992). Représentation de l'orientation du corps et de la vitesse du mouvement en danse chez les enfants de 10 ans. STAPS, 9, 19-31.
4. DECETY, J., & JEANNEROD, M. (1996). Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: Does Fitt's law hold in motor imagery? Behavioural Brain Research, 72, 127-134.
5. DECETY, J., JEANNEROD, M., DUROZARD, D., & BAVEREL, G. (1993). Central activation of autonomic effectors during mental simulation of motor actions. Journal of Physiology, 461, 549-563.
6. DECETY, J., JEANNEROD, M., GERMAIN, M., & PASTENE, J. (1991). Vegetative response during imagined movement is proportional to mental effort. Behavioural Brain Research, 42, 1-5.
7. DECETY, J., JEANNEROD, M., & PRABLANC, C. (1989). The timing of mentally represented actions. Behavioural Brain Research, 34, 35-42.
8. DECETY, J., & MICHEL, F. (1989). Comparative analysis of actual and mental movement times in two graphics tasks. Brain and Cognition, 11, 87-97.
9. DENIS, S., & BOUCHER, J. L. (1991). La représentation spatiale d'un tracé bi-dimensionnel. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 45, 405-414.
10. EUZET, J.-P., & GAHÉRY, Y. (1995). Relationships between position sense and physical practice. Journal of Human Movement Study, 28, 149-173.
11. EUZET, J.-P., & GAHÉRY, Y. (1996). Kinesthésie et motricité: Influence de la pratique sur le sens de la position. Science et Motricité, 29-30, 30-40.
12. FELTZ, D. L., & LANDERS, D. M. (1983). The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Psychology, 5, 25-57.
13. FÉRY, Y. A. (2003). Differentiating visual and kinesthetic imagery in mental practice. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 1-10.
14. FÉRY, Y. A., & MORIZOT, P. (2001). Kinesthetic and visual images in modelling closed motor skills: the example of the tennis serve. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 707-722.
15. GOSS, S., HALL, C. R., BUCKOLZ, E., & FISHBURNE, G. J. (1986). Imagery ability and the acquisition and retention of movements. Memory and Cognition, 14, 469-477.
16. HALL, C. R., BUCKOLZ, E., & FISHBURNE, G. J. (1992). Imagery and the acquisition of motor skills. Canadian Journal of Sport Science, 17, 19-27.
17. HALL, C. R., & PONGRAC, J. (1983). Movement Imagery Questionnaire. London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario.
18. HARDY, L. (1997). Three myths about applied consultancy work. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 9, 277-294.
19. HARDY, L., & CALLOW, N. (1999). Efficacy of external and internal visual imagery perspectives for the enhancement of performance on tasks in which form is important. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 21, 95-112.
20. INGVAR, D., & PHILIPSSON, L. (1977). Distribution of the cerebral blood flow in the dominant hemisphere during motor ideation and motor performance. Annals of Neurology, 2, 230-237.
21. JEANNEROD, M. (1999). Perspectives on the Representation of Actions. The Quarterly journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 1-29.
22. PROTEAU, L., & CARNAHAN, H. (2001). What causes specificity of practice in a manual aiming movement: vision dominance or transformation errors? Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 226-234.
23. ROBIN, C., PROTEAU, L., TOUSSAINT, L., & BLANDIN, Y. (en révision). Specificity of learning in a video-aiming task: modifying the salience of dynamic visual cues. Journal of Motor Behavior.
24. ROBIN, C., TOUSSAINT, L., BLANDIN, Y., & VINTER, A. (in press). Sensory integration in the learning of aiming towards "self-defined" targets. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport.
25. RODIER, S., EUZET, J. P., GAHÉRY, Y.&PAILLARD, J. (1991). Cross-modal versus intramodal evaluation of the knee joint angle. A normative study in a population of young adults. Human Movement Science, 10, 689-712.
26. ROURE, R., COLLET, C., DESCHAUMES- MOLINARO, C., DELHOMME, G., DITTMAR, A.&VERNET-MAURY, E. (1999). Imagery quality estimated by autonomic response is correlated to sporting performance enhancement. Physiology and Behavior, 66, 63-72.
27. SIRIGU, A., DUHAMEL, J. R., COHEN, L., PILLON, B., DUBOIS, B.&AGID, Y. (1996). The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science, 273, 1564-1568.
28. TREMBLAY, L.&PROTEAU, L. (1998). Specificity of practice: The case of powerlifting. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69, 284-289.
29. TREMBLAY, L., WELSH, T. N.&ELLIOTT, D. (2001). Specificity versus variability: Effects of practice conditions on the use of afferent information for manual aiming. Motor Control, 5, 347-360.
30. WHITE, A.&HARDY, L. (1995). Use of different imagery perspectives on the learning and performance of different motor skills. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 169-180.