Developing a methodology for three-dimensional correlation of PET-CT images and whole-mount histopathology in non-small-cell lung cancer

Current Oncology

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 62-69

  Dahele, M ^a,b   Hwang, D ^b,d   Peressotti, C ^f   Sun, L ^c,f   Kusano, M ^f   Okhai, S ^f   Darling, G ^c,e   Yaffe, M ^b,f   Caldwell, C ^b,f   Mah, K ^b,f,g   Hornby, J ^e   Ehrlich, L ^g   Raphael, S ^b,g   Tsao, M ^b,d   Behzadi, A ^h   Weigensberg, C ^h   Ung, Yeng C ^b,i  

^a PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^e TORONTO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^f Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences   (Canada)

^g SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^h SCARBOROUGH HOSPITAL   (Canada)

ⁱ DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Non small cell lung cancer; Positron emission tomography; Radiology pathology correlation

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LUNG NON SMALL CELL CANCER; MICROSCOPY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; REVIEW; THORAX WALL RECONSTRUCTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 68649091267     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17187729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Canadian Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2008. Toronto: Canadian Cancer Society; 2008. [Available online at: www.cancer.ca/Ontario/Publications/ Publications%20on%20cancer%20statistics/~/media/CCS/Canada%20wide/ Files%20List/English%20files%20heading/ pdf%20not%20in%20publications%20section/ Canadian%20Cancer%20Society%20Statistics%20PDF%202008_614137951.ashx; cited: September 9, 2008]
2. Vinod SK, Barton MB. Actual versus optimal utilization of radiotherapy in lung cancer: where is the shortfall? Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2007;3:30-6.
3. Van de Steene J, Linthout N, de Mey J, et al. Definition of gross tumor volume in lung cancer: inter-observer variability. Radiother Oncol 2002;62:37-49.
4. Steenbakkers RJ, Duppen JC, Fitton I, et al. Reduction of observer variation using matched CT-PET for lung cancer delineation: a three-dimensional analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;64:435-48.
5. Giraud P, Antoine M, Larrouy A, et al. Evaluation of microscopic tumor extension in non-small-cell lung cancer for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;48:1015-24.
6. Li WL, Yu JM, Liu GH, Zhong WX, Li WW, Zhang BJ. A comparative study on radiology and pathology target volume in non-small-cell lung cancer [Chinese]. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 2003;25:566-8.
7. Grills IS, Fitch DL, Goldstein NS, et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of microscopic extension in lung adenocarcinoma: defining clinical target volume for radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;69334-41.
8. Chan R, He Y, Haque A, Zwischenberger J. Computed tomographic-pathologic correlation of gross tumor volume and clinical target volume in non-small cell lung cancer: a pilot experience. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001;125:1469-72.
9. Goldstein NS, Ferkowicz M, Kestin L, Chmielewski GW, Welsh RJ. Wedge resection margin distances and residual adenocarcinoma in lobectomy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 2003;120:720-4.
10. Stroom J, Blaauwgeers H, van Baardwijk A, et al. Feasibility of pathology-correlated lung imaging for accurate target definition of lung tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;69:267-75.
11. Clarke GM, Eidt S, Sun L, Mawdsley G, Zubovits JT, Yaffe MJ. Whole-specimen histopathology: a method to produce whole-mount breast serial sections for 3-D digital histopathology imaging. Histopathology 2007;50:232-42.
12. Clarke GM, Peressotti C, Mawdsley GE, Yaffe MJ. Design and characterization of a digital image acquisition system for whole-specimen breast histopathology. Phys Med Biol 2006;51:5089-103.
13. Daisne JF, Duprez T, Weynand B, et al. Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen. Radiology 2004;23:93-100. [Erratum in: Radiology 2005;235:1086]
14. 18F-FDG PET with pathologic features in non-small cell lung cancer: a feasibility study. Radiother Oncol 2008;87:55-8.
15. Crum WR, Hartkens T, Hill DL. Non-rigid image registration: theory and practice. Br J Radiol 2004;77(spec no 2):S140-53.