Who benefits from deregulating the separation of banking activities? Differential effects on commercial bank, investment bank, and thrift stock returns

Financial Review

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 317-341

  Czyrnik, Kathy ^a   Klein, Linda Schmid ^b  

^a CENTRAL CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Banking; Deregulation; Event study; Financial modernization; G21 G22; Glass steagall; Gramm leach bililey act; Wealth effects

Indexed keywords

EID: 68549127553     PISSN: 07328516     EISSN: 15406288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0732-8516.2004.00078.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Akhigbe, A., and A.M. Whyte., 2001. The market’s assessment of the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, The Financial Review 36, 119-138.
2. Ang, J.S., and T. Richardson., 1994. The underwriting experience of commercial bank affiliates prior to the Glass-Steagall Act: A re-examination of evidence for passage of the Act, Journal of Banking and Finance 18, 351-395.
3. Apilado, V.P., J.G. Gallo., and L.J. Lockwood., 1993. Expanded securities underwriting: Implications for bank risk and return, Journal of Economics and Business 45, 143-158.
4. Atlas, R., 1997. Ranking America’s biggest brokers: Good news, bad news, Institutional Investor 31, 107-111.
5. Bahargava, R., and D.R. Fraser., 1998. On the wealth and risk effects of commercial bank expansion into securities underwriting: An analysis of Section 20 subsidiaries, Journal of Banking and Finance 22, 447-465.
6. Benston, G.J., 1989. The federal “safety net” and the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act’s separation of commercial and investment banking, Journal of Financial Services Research 2, 287-305.
7. Berger, A.N., R.S. Demsetz., and P.E. Strahan., 1999. The consolidation of the financial services industry: Causes, consequences, and implications for the future, Journal of Banking and Finance 23, 135-194.
8. Boehmer, E., J. Musumeci., and A.B. Poulsen., 1991. Event-study methodology under conditions of event-induced variance, Journal of Financial Economics 30, 253-272.
9. Brown, S.J., and J.B. Warner., 1985. Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies, Journal of Financial Economics 14, 3-31.
10. Carow, K.A., and Randall A. Heron., 2002. Capital market reactions to the passage of the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 42, 465-485.
11. Cohen, H.R., D.J. Tourney., and M.S. Eitel., 1997. Investment banking firms-Get one before they’re gone, The M & A Lawyer 16, 1-11.
12. Cornett, M.M., and H. Tehranian., 1990. An examination of the impact of the Garn-St Germain Depository Institutions Act of 1982 on commercial banks and savings and loans, Journal of Finance 45, 95-111.
13. Cyree, K.B., 2000. The erosion of the Glass-Steagall Act: Winners and losers in the banking industry, Journal of Economics and Business 52, 343-363.
14. Flannery, M.J., and C.M. James., 1984. The effect of interest rate changes on the common stock returns of financial institutions, Journal of Finance 39, 1141-1153.
15. Giliberto, M., 1985. Interest rate sensitivity in the common stocks of financial intermediaries: A methodological note, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 20, 123-126.
16. Jaffe, J.F., 1974. Special information and insider trading, Journal of Business 47, 410-428.
17. Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling., 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360.
18. Johnston, J., and J. Madura., 2000. Valuing the potential transformation of banks into financial service conglomerates: Evidence from the Citigroup merger, The Financial Review 35, 17-36.
19. Kracaw, W.A., and M. Zenner., 1996. The wealth effects of bank financing announcements in highly leveraged transactions, Journal of Finance 51, 1931-1946.
20. Kroszner, R.S., and R.G. Rajan., 1994. Is the Glass-Steagall Act justified? A study of the U.S. experience with universal banking before 1933, American Economic Review 84, 810-32.
21. MacKinlay, A.C., 1997. Event studies in economics and finance, Journal of Economic Literature 35, 13-39.
22. Market monitor, 1997. American Banker July 17, p. 25.
23. O’Hara, M., and W. Shaw., 1990. Deposit insurance and wealth effects: The value of being “too big to fail, “Journal of Finance 45, 1587-1600.
24. Patell, J.M., 1976. Corporate forecasts of earnings per share and stock price behavior: Empirical tests, Journal of Accounting Research 14, 246-276.
25. Puri, M., 1994. The long-term default performance of bank underwritten security issues, Journal of Banking and Finance 18, 397-418.
26. Puri, M., 1999. Commercial banks as underwriters: Implications for the going public process, Journal of Financial Economics 54, 133-163.
27. Rao, P., 1974. Specification bias in seemingly unrelated regressions. In W. Sellekaert (Ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jan Tinbergen (pp. 103-133), New York: International Arts and Sciences Press.
28. Roll, R., 1986. The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeover, Journal of Business 59, 197-216.
29. Saunders, A., and M. Smirlock., 1987. Intra- and interindustry effects of bank securities market activities: The case of discount brokerage, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22, 467-482.
30. Slovin, M.B., M.E. Sushka., and J.A. Polonchek., 1999. An analysis of contagion and competitive effects at commercial banks, Journal of Financial Economics 54, 197-225.
31. Ward’s Business Directory of U.S. Private and Public Companies, 1999. Detroit: Gale Research.
32. Whiting, R.M., 1997. Dismantling Glass-Steagall: The road not taken, The Journal of Lending & Credit Risk Management 30-36.