Biomechanics/risk management (Working Group 2)

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Volumn 20, Issue SUPPL. 4, 2009, Pages 107-111

  Sanz, Mariano ^b   Naert, Ignace ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Anticoagulants; Bisphosphonates; Cantilevers; Crown implant ratio; Guided implant surgery; Implant supported restorations

Indexed keywords

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT; BISPHOSPHONIC ACID DERIVATIVE; BONE DENSITY CONSERVATION AGENT;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONSENSUS; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; HUMAN; RISK MANAGEMENT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANTICOAGULANTS; BONE DENSITY CONSERVATION AGENTS; CONSENSUS; DENTAL CARE FOR CHRONICALLY ILL; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; DIPHOSPHONATES; HUMANS; RISK MANAGEMENT; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 68549115353     PISSN: 09057161     EISSN: 16000501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01780.x     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Blanes, R. (2009) To what extent does the crown-implant ratio affect survival and complications of implant supported restorations. Clinical Oral Implant Research 20 (Suppl. 4) : 67 72.
2. Madrid, C. Sanz, M. (2009a) What is the impact of systemic bisphosphonates on patients undergoing oral implant therapy? Clinical Oral Implant Research 20 (Suppl. 4) : 87 95.
3. Madrid, C. Sanz, M. (2009b) What is the impact of anticoagulants on patients undergoing oral implant therapy? Clinical Oral Implant Research 20 (Suppl. 4) : 96 106.
4. Schneider, D., Marquardt, P., Zwahlen, M. Jung, R.E. (2009) A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template based implant dentistry. Clinical Oral Implant Research 20 (Suppl. 4) : 73 86.
5. Zurdo, J., Romao, C. Wennström, J. (2009) To what extent do cantilevers affect survival and complications of implant supported restorations in partially dentate patients. Clinical Oral Implant Research 20 (Suppl. 4) : 59 66.