Utility of short-term evaluation of presbyopic contact lens performance

Eye and Contact Lens

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 144-148

  Papas, Eric B ^a   Decenzo Verbeten, Teresa ^a   Fonn, Desmond ^c   Holden, Brien A ^a   Kollbaum, Pete S ^d   Situ, Ping ^c   Tan, Jackie ^a   Woods, Craig ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b CIBA Vision Corporation   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Multifocal contact lens; Presbyopia; Subjective assessment; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMAN; ILLUMINATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIFOCAL LENS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRESBYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; READING; RECOGNITION; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRESBYOPIA; READING; SELF-ASSESSMENT; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 68549106300     PISSN: 15422321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181a20361     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Morgan PB, Efron N, Woods CA, et al. International contact lens prescribing in 2003. Contact Lens Spectrum 2004;19:34-37.
2. Morgan PB, Woods CA, Knajian R, et al. International contact lens prescribing in 2007. Contact Lens Spectrum 2008;23:36-41.
3. NC-EST2007-01, Annual Estimates of the Population by Sex and Five- Year Age Groups for the United States: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2007 [database online]. Washington, DC, U.S. Census Bureau, 2008.
4. Gauthier CA, Holden BA, Grant T, et al. Interest of presbyopes in contact lens correction and their success with monovision. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69:858-862.
5. Westin E, Wick B, Harrist RB. Factors influencing success of monovision contact lens fitting: Survey of contact lens diplomates. Optometry 2000;71:757-763.
6. Legge GE. Ross JA. Luebker A, et al. Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low-Vision Reading test. Optom Vis Sci 1989;66:843-853.
7. Sheedy JE, Harris MG, Gan CM. Does the presbyopic visual system adapt to contact lenses? Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:482-486.
8. Papas EB, Schultz BL. Repeatability and comparison of visual analogue and numerical rating scales in the assessment of visual quality. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1997;17:492-498.
9. American Medical Association. Physician's Guide to Assessing and Counseling Older Drivers. Chicago, American Medical Association, 2003.
10. The College of Optometrists Members' Handbook. London, United Kingdom, College of Optometrists, 2008. Section 30.03.
11. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310.