Visual self-motion perception in older adults: Implications for Postural Control During Locomotion

Neurology Report

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 15-20

  Cavanaugh, James T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Exercise testing; Secondary conditions

Indexed keywords

EID: 68349159481     PISSN: 1085049X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01253086-200226010-00006     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Patla AE. Understanding the roles of vision in the control of locomotion. Gait & Posture. 1997; 5: 54-69.
2. Gibson JJ. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, Mass: Houghton Mifflin Co; 1979.
3. Paiihous J, Ferrandez AM, Fluckiger M, Baumberger B. Unintentional modulations of human gait by optical flow. Behav Brain Res. 1990; 38: 275-281.
4. Warren WH, Jr., Blackwell AW, Morris MW. Age differences in perceiving the direction of self-motion from optical flow J Gerontol. 1989; 44: 147-153.
5. Van den Berg AV. Human ego-motion perception. Intermit Rev Neurobiol. 2000; 44: 3-25.
6. Bardy BG, Warren WH, Jr., Kay BA. Motion parallax is used to control postural sway during walking. Exp Brain Res. 1996; 111: 271-282.
7. Bremmer F, Duhamcl J-R, Hamed B, Werner G. Stages of self-motion processing in primate posterior parietal cortex. Internat Rev Neurobiol. 2000; 44: 173-198.
8. Vaina LM, Rushton SK. What neurological patients tell us about the use of optic flow. Internat Rev Neurobiol. 2000; 44: 293-313.
9. Kim N-G, Growney R, Turvey MT. Optical flow not retinal flow is the basis of wayfinding by foot. J Exp Psy. 1996; 22: 1279-1288.
10. Bardy BG, Warren WH, Kay BA. The role of central and peripheral vision in postural control during walking. Percept Psychophys. 1999; 61: 1356-1368.
11. Prokop T, Schubert M, Berger W. Visual influence on human locomotion. Modulation to changes in optic flow. Exp Brain Res. 1997; 114: 63-70.
12. Zijlstra W, Dietz V. Adaptability of the human stride cycle during split-belt walking. Gait & Posture. 1995; 3: 250-257.
13. Trick GL, Silverman SE. Visual sensitivity to motion: age-related changes and deficits in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neurology’. 1991; 41: 1437-1440.
14. Wojciechowski R, Trick GL, Steinman SB. Topography of the age-related decline in motion sensitivity. Optom Vis Set. 1995; 72: 67-74.
15. Wist ER, Schrauf M, Ehrenstein WH. Dynamic vision based on motion-contrast: changes with age in adults. Exp Brain Res. 2000; 134: 295-300.
16. Willis A, Anderson SJ. Effects of glaucoma and aging on photopic and scotopic motion perception. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000; 41: 325-335.
17. Tran DB, Silverman SE, Zimmerman K, Feldon SE. Age-related deterioration of motion perception and. detection. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998; 236: 269-273.
18. Gilmore GC, Wenk HE, Naylor LA, Stuve TA. Motion perception and aging. Psychol Aging. 1992; 7: 654-660.
19. Atchley P, Andersen GJ. The effect of age, retinal eccentricity, and speed on the detection of optic flow components. Psychol Aging. 1998; 13: 297-308.
20. Wade MG, Lindquist R, Taylor JR, Treat-Jacobson D. Optical flow, spatial orientation, and the control of posture in the elderly. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1995; 50: 51-P58.
21. Sundermier L, Woollacott MH, Jensen JL, Moore S. Postural sensitivity to visual flow in aging adults with and without balance problems. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Mecl Sci. 1996; 51: M45-52.
22. Lord SR, Day hew J. Visual risk factors for falls in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001; 49: 508-515.
23. Ansari E, Buckingham T. Movement detection threshold and ocular hypertension. Eye. 2001; 15(pt 2): 193-196.
24. Brown B, Brabyn L, Welch L, Haegerstrom-Portnoy G, Colenbrander A. Contribution of vision variables to mobility in age-related maculopathy patients. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986; 63: 733-739.