Why are some parkinson disease patients unaware of their dyskinesias?

Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 117-121

  Jenkinson, Paul M ^c   Edelstyn, Nicola M J ^a   Stephens, Richard ^a   Ellis, Simon J ^b  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH STAFFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^c STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anosognosia; Dyskinesias; Forward model; Parkinson disease

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANOSOGNOSIA; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROL GROUP; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSKINESIA; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INVOLUNTARY MOVEMENT; MALE; PARKINSON DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION; VOLUNTEER; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SELF CONCEPT;

ANTIPARKINSON AGENT; LEVODOPA;

AGED; ANTIPARKINSON AGENTS; AWARENESS; DYSKINESIA, DRUG-INDUCED; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEVODOPA; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PARKINSON DISEASE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SELF CONCEPT;

EID: 68349153179     PISSN: 15433633     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNN.0b013e3181a722b0     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Muller T, Woitalla D, Russ H, et al. Prevalence and treatment strategies of dyskinesia in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neural Transm. 2007;114:1023-1026.
2. Vitale C, Pellecchina MT, Grossi D, et al. Unawareness of dyskinesias in Parkinson's and Huntington's diseases. Neurol Sci. 2001;22:105-106.
3. Schrag A, Quinn N. Dyskinesias and motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease: a community-based study. Brain. 2000;123:2297-2305.
4. Seltzer B, Vasterling JJ, Mathias CW, et al. Clinical and neuropsychological correlates of impaired awareness of deficits in Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease: a comparative study. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 2001;14:122-129.
5. Leritz E, Loftis C, Crucian G, et al. Self-awareness of deficits in Parkinson disease. Clin Neuropsychol. 2004;18:352-361.
6. Wolpert DM. Computational models of motor control. Trends Cogn Sci. 1997;1:209-216.
7. Blakemore S-J, Frith CD, Wolpert DM. The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action. Neuroreport. 2001;12:1879-1884.
8. Fink GR, Marshall JC, Halligan PW, et al. The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. Brain. 1999;122:497-512.
9. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. Neurology. 1967;17:427-442.
10. Fahn S, Elton RL. Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale. In: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Goldstein M, et al, eds. Recent Developments in Parkinson's Disease. Florham, NJ: McMillan Healthcare Information; 1987:153-164.
11. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state:" a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189-198.
12. Nelson HE, Willison J. National Adult Reading Test (NART): Test Manual. 2nd ed. Windsor, UK: NFER Nelson; 1991
13. Burgess PW, Shallice T. The Hayling and Brixton Tests. Bury St Edmunds, England: Thames Valley Test Company; 1997.
14. Pia L, Neppi-Modona M, Ricci R, et al. The anatomy of anosognosia for hemiplegia: a meta-analysis. Cortex. 2004;40: 367-377.
15. Jenkinson PM, Edelstyn NMJ, Ellis SJ. Imagining the impossible: motor representations in anosognosia for hemiplegia. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47:481-488.