Morphological divergence as a result of common adaptation to a shared environment in land snails of the genus Hirasea

Journal of Molluscan Studies

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 253-259

  Chiba, Satoshi ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BURROWING; DIVERGENCE; ECOMORPHOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MOVEMENT; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; SNAIL;

GASTROPODA; HIRASEA; STYLOMMATOPHORA;

EID: 68349128442     PISSN: 02601230     EISSN: 14643766     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/mollus/eyp020     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ADAMS, D.C. & ROHLF, F.J. 2000. Ecological character displacement in Plethodon: biomechanical differences found from a geometric morphometric study. Proceedings of the.National Academy of Science of the USA, 97: 4106-4111.
2. CAIN, A.J. 1978. The deployment ofoperculate land snails in relation to shape and size of shell. Malacologia, 17: 207 - 221.
3. CAIN, A.J. 1983. Ecology and ecogenetics of terrestrial molluscan populations. In: The Mollusca, Vol. 6. Ecology (W.D. Russell-Hunter ed.), pp. 597-647. Academic Press, London.
4. CAIN, A.J. & COWIE, R.H. 1978. Activity ofdifferent species ofland snail on surfaces of different inclinations. Journal of Conchology, 29: 267-272.
5. CAMERON, R.A.D. & COOK, L.M. 1989. Shell size and shape in Madeiran land snails: do niches remain unfilled? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 36: 79-96.
6. CHIBA, S. 1999. Accelerated evolution of land snails Mandarina in the oceanic Bonin Islands: evidence from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Evolution, 53: 460-471.
7. CHIBA, S. 2004. Ecological and morphological patterns in communities of land snails of the genus Mandarina from the Bonin Islands. Journal ofEvolutionary Biology, 17: 131 -143.
8. CHIBA, S. 2007. Species richness patterns along environmental gradients in island land molluscan fauna. Ecology, 88: 1738 - 1746.
9. CHIBA, S. & DAVISON, A. 2007. Shell shape and habitat use in the NW Pacific land snail Mandarina polita from Hahajima, Ogasawara Islands: current adaptation or ghost of species past? Biological Journal ofthe Linnean Society, 91: 149-159.
10. COOK, L.M. 1997. Geographic and ecological patterns in Turkish land snails. Journal ofBiogeography, 24: 409 -418.
11. COWIE, R.H. 1995. Variation in species diversity and shell shape in Hawaiian land snails: in situ speciation and ecological relationship. Evolution, 49: 1191 -1202.
12. DAVISON, A. 2002. Land snails as a model to understand the role of history and selection in the origins of biodiversity. Population Ecology, 44: 129-136.
13. DEWITT, T.J. & LANGERHANS, R.B. 2003. Multiple prey traits, multiple predators: keys to understanding complex community dynamics. Journal of Sea Research, 49: 143 - 155.
14. DEWITT, T.J., ROBINSON, B.W. & WILSON, D.S. 2000. Functional diversity among predators of a freshwater snail imposes an adaptive tradeoff for shell morphology. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 2: 129-148.
15. FUTUYMA, D.J. & MORENO, G. 1988. The evolution of ecological specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 19: 207-233.
16. GANS, C. & DE VREE, F. 1986. Shingle-back lizards crush snail shells using temporal summation (tetanus) to increase force of the adductor muscles. Experientia, 42: 387 - 389.
17. GOODFRIEND, G.A. 1986. Variation in land-snail shell form and size and its causes: a review. Systematic Zoology, 35: 204-223.
18. GOULD, S.J. 1984. Covariance sets and ordered geographic variation in Cerion from Aruba, Bonaire and Curacao: a way of studying nonadaptation. Systematic Zoology, 33: 217 - 237.
19. GOULD, S.J. 1989. A developmental constraint in Cerion, with comments on the definition and interpretation of constraint in evolution. Evolution, 43: 516 -539.
20. HELLER, J. 1987. Shell shape and land-snail habitat in a Mediterranean and desert fauna. Biological Journal ofthe Linnean Society, 31: 257-272.
21. HORN, H.S. 1966. Measurement of 'overlap' in comparative ecological studies. American.aturalist, 100: 419-424.
22. INODA, T., HIRATA, Y. & KAMIMURA, S. 2003. Asymmetric mandibles of water-scavenger larvae improve feeding effectiveness on right-handed snails. American.aturalist, 162: 811 -814.
23. KARUBE, H. 2004. The endemic insect fauna of the Ogasawara Islands: changes in the insect fauna of the oceanic islands by human activity. Research Report of the Kanagawa Prefectural Museum Natural History, 12: 13-15.
24. KONUMA, J. & CHIBA, S. 2007. Trade-offs between force and fit: extreme morphologies associated with feeding behavior in carabid beetles. American.Naturalist, 170: 90-100.
25. MARKO, P.B. 2005. An intraspecific comparative analysis of character divergence between sibling species. Evolution, 59: 554-564.
26. OHYAMA, K. 1940. Field collection of mollusca in Ogasawara. Venus, 10: 51 -58.
27. PALMER, A.R. 1979. Fish predation and the evolution of gastropod shell sculpture: experimental and geographic evidence. Evolution, 33: 697-713.
28. PINHEIRO, J.C. & BATES, D.M. 2000. Mixed-effect models in S and S-PLUS, Springer-Verlag, New York.
29. RAUP, D.M. 1966. Geometric analysis of shell coiling: general problems. Journal ofPaleontology, 40: 1178-1190.
30. R DEVEROPMENT CORE TEAM. 2006. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
31. SCHILTHUIZEN, M., VAN TIL, A., SALVERDA, M., LIEW, T.S., JAMES, S., BIN ELAHAN, B. amp; VERMEULEN, J.J. 2006.
32. Microgeographic evolution of snail shell shape and predator behavior. Evolution, 60: 1851-1858.
33. SCHLUTER, D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
34. SMITH, T.B. 1987. Bill size polymorphism and interspecific niche utilization in an African finch.Nature, 329: 717-719.
35. SMITH, T.B. & TEMPLE, S.A. 1982. Feeding habits and bill polymorphism in Hook-billed Kites. Auk, 99: 197-207.
36. SPSS. 2000. Systat 10. SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA.
37. STONE, J.R. 1996. Computer-simulated shell size and shape variation in the Caribbean land snail genus Cerion: a test of geometrical constraints. Evolution, 50: 341-347.
38. SVANBÄCK, R. & EKLÖV, P. 2003. Morphology dependent foraging efficiency in perch: a trade-off for ecological specialization? Oikos, 102: 273-284.
39. TAPER, M.L. & CASE, T.J. 1985. Quantitative genetic models for the coevolution of character displacement. Ecology, 66: 355 - 371.
40. VERMEIJ, G.J. 1976. Interoceanic differences in vulnerability of shelled prey to crab predation.ature, 260: 135-136.
41. WEST, K., COHEN, A. & BARON, M. 1991. Morphology and behavior of crabs and gastropods from Lake Tanganyika, Africa: implications for lacustrine predator-prey coevolution. Evolution, 45: 589-607.