Negations in syllogistic reasoning: Evidence for a heuristic-analytic conflict

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 62, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1533-1541

  Stupple, Edward J N ^a   Waterhouse, Eleanor F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DERBY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Deduction; Heuristic analytic; Matching; Negations; Syllogisms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOGIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 68349115879     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210902785674     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Chater, N., & Oaksford, M. (1999). The probability heuristics model of syllogistic reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 191-258.
2. Evans, J. St. B. T. (2007). On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 13, 321-339.
3. Evans, J. St. B. T. (2009). How many dual process theories dowe need: One, two or many? In J. St. B. T. Evans &. K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4. Evans, J. St. B. T., Newstead, S. E., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1993). Human reasoning: The psychology of deduction. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
5. Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650-669.
6. Gilhooly, K. J. (2005). Working memory and strategies in reasoning. In M. J. Roberts & E. J. Newton (Eds.), Methods of thought: Individual differences in reasoning strategies. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
7. Hardman, D. K., & Payne, S. J. (1995). Problem difficulty and response format in syllogistic reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 945-975.
8. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1989). Only reasoning. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 313-330.
9. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
10. Rips, L. J. (1994). The psychology of proof. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Roberts, M. J. (2005). Expanding the universe of categorical syllogisms: A challenge for reasoning researchers. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 560-580.
12. Schroyens, W., Schaeken, W., Fias, W., & d'Ydewalle, G. (2000). Heuristic and analytic processes in propositional reasoning with negatives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1713-1734.
13. Sloman, S. A. (2002). Two systems of reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 379-398). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14. Stenning, K. (2002). Seeing reason. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15. Stupple, E. J. N., & Ball, L. J. (2007). Figural effects in a syllogistic evaluation paradigm: An inspection-time analysis. Experimental Psychology, 54, 120-127.
16. Stupple, E. J. N., & Ball, L. J. (2008). Belief-logic conflict resolution in syllogistic reasoning: Inspection-time evidence for a parallel-process model. Thinking & Reasoning, 14, 168-181.
17. Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. London: Batsford.
18. Wetherick, N. E. (1989). Psychology and syllogistic reasoning. Philosophical Psychology, 2, 111-125.
19. Wetherick, N. E., & Gilhooly, G. J. (1995). "Atmosphere", matching, and logic in syllogistic reasoning. Current Psychology, 14, 169-178.