Quantitative detection of myocardial ischaemia by stress echocardiography; A comparison with SPECT

Cardiovascular Ultrasound

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Gudmundsson, Petri ^a   Shahgaldi, Kambiz ^b   Winter, Reidar ^b   Dencker, Magnus ^c   Kitlinski, Mariusz ^c   Thorsson, Ola ^c   Willenheimer, Ronnie B ^c,d   Ljunggren, Lennart ^a  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d Heart Health Group   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; SONOVUE; TECHNETIUM 99M; TETROFOSMIN; CONTRAST AGENT BR1; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; ORGANOPHOSPHORUS COMPOUND; PHOSPHOLIPID; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT; SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE; TECHNETIUM COMPLEX; TECHNETIUM TC 99M 1,2 BIS(BIS(2 ETHOXYETHYL)PHOSPHINO)ETHANE; TECHNETIUM TC 99M 1,2-BIS(BIS(2-ETHOXYETHYL)PHOSPHINO)ETHANE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY CIRCUMFLEX BRANCH; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; EXERCISE TEST; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCINTISCANNING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; ORGANOPHOSPHORUS COMPOUNDS; ORGANOTECHNETIUM COMPOUNDS; PHOSPHOLIPIDS; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON;

EID: 68349114767     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14767120     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-7-28     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Task force on the management of chest pain. L Erhardt J Herlitz L Bossaert M Halinen M Keltai R Koster C Marcassa T Quinn H van Weert, Eur Heart J 2002 23 15 1153 1176 10.1053/euhj.2002.3194 12206127 (Pubitemid 35221313)
2. Management of stable angina pectoris. Recommendations of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology. TFotESo Cardiology, Eur Heart J 1997 18 3 394 413 9076376
3. Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). R Sicari P Nihoyannopoulos A Evangelista J Kasprzak P Lancellotti D Poldermans JU Voigt JL Zamorano, Eur J Echocardiogr 2008 9 4 415 437 10.1093/ejechocard/jen175 18579481 (Pubitemid 351882130)
4. Noninvasive evaluation of ischaemic heart disease: myocardial perfusion imaging or stress echocardiography? AF Schinkel JJ Bax ML Geleijnse E Boersma A Elhendy JR Roelandt D Poldermans, Eur Heart J 2003 24 9 789 800 10.1016/S0195-668X(02)00634-6 12727146 (Pubitemid 36528558)
5. Stress echocardiography. E Picano, Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2004 2 1 77 88 10.1586/14779072.2.1.77 15038415 (Pubitemid 38678759)
6. Long-term prognosis after normal dobutamine stress echocardiography. FB Sozzi A Elhendy JR Roelandt RT van Domburg AF Schinkel EC Vourvouri JJ Bax V Rizzello D Poldermans, Am J Cardiol 2003 92 11 1267 1270 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003. 08.005 14636901 (Pubitemid 37431132)
7. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence. SR Underwood C Anagnostopoulos M Cerqueira PJ Ell EJ Flint M Harbinson AD Kelion A Al-Mohammad EM Prvulovich LJ Shaw, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004 31 2 261 291 15129710 10.1007/s00259-003-1344-5 (Pubitemid 38173703)
8. Comparative value of dobutamine and adenosine stress in the detection of coronary stenosis with myocardial contrast echocardiography. S Lafitte H Matsugata B Peters M Togni M Strachan OL Kwan AN DeMaria, Circulation 2001 103 22 2724 2730 11390344
9. Adenosine-echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. Y Takeishi J Chiba S Abe K Ikeda H Tomoike, J Cardiol 1994 24 1 1 7 8158526
10. Combined assessment of myocardial perfusion and regional left ventricular function by analysis of contrast-enhanced power modulation images. V Mor-Avi EG Caiani KA Collins CE Korcarz JE Bednarz RM Lang, Circulation 2001 104 3 352 357 11457757 (Pubitemid 32666960)
11. Real-time perfusion adenosine stress echocardiography versus myocardial perfusion adenosine scintigraphy for the detection of myocardial ischaemia in patients with stable coronary artery disease. P Gudmundsson R Winter M Dencker M Kitlinski O Thorsson L Ljunggren R Willenheimer, Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2006 26 1 32 38 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2005.00646.x 16398668 (Pubitemid 43379278)
12. Real-time perfusion adenosine stress echocardiography in the coronary care unit: a feasible bedside tool for predicting coronary artery stenosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome. R Winter P Gudmundsson R Willenheimer, Eur J Echocardiogr 2005 6 1 31 40 10.1016/j.euje.2004.06.003 15664551 (Pubitemid 40123707)
13. Advances in myocardial contrast echocardiography and the role of adenosine stress. SL Mulvagh, Am J Cardiol 2004 94 2A 12D 17D 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.04.011 15261126 (Pubitemid 38917186)
14. Myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: a prospective multicenter study in comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography. P Jeetley M Hickman O Kamp RM Lang JD Thomas MA Vannan JL Vanoverschelde PA van der Wouw R Senior, J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 47 1 141 145 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.054 16386678 (Pubitemid 43005178)
15. Real-time myocardial perfusion imaging for pharmacologic stress testing: added value to single photon emission computed tomography. G Korosoglou AE Dubart KG DaSilva Jr N Labadze S Hardt A Hansen R Bekeredjian C Zugck J Zehelein HA Katus, Am Heart J 2006 151 1 131 138 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.02.046 16368304 (Pubitemid 41815341)
16. Comparison of low-mechanical index pulse sequence schemes for detecting myocardial perfusion abnormalities during vasodilator stress echocardiography. JM Tsutsui F Xie AC McGrain H Mahrous J Hankins EL O'Leary TR Porter, Am J Cardiol 2005 95 5 565 570 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.10.035 15721092 (Pubitemid 40255241)
17. Real-time myocardial contrast stress echocardiography using bolus application. GH Wasmeier S Asmussen JU Voigt FA Flachskampf WG Daniel U Nixdorff, Ultrasound Med Biol 2008 34 11 1724 1731 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008. 03.017 18485566
18. Head to head comparisons of two modalities of perfusion adenosine stress echocardiography with simultaneous SPECT. P Gudmundsson K Shahgaldi R Winter M Dencker M Kitlinski O Thorsson L Ljunggren R Willenheimer, Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2009 7 19 19379491 10.1186/1476-7120-7-19
19. Contrast echocardiography can assess risk area and infarct size during coronary occlusion and reperfusion: experimental validation. S Lafitte A Higashiyama H Masugata B Peters M Strachan OL Kwan AN DeMaria, J Am Coll Cardiol 2002 39 9 1546 1554 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01771-0 11985921 (Pubitemid 34439074)
20. Clinical application of quantitative analysis in real-time MCE. L Agati G Tonti G Pedrizzetti F Magri S Funaro M Madonna F Celani T Messager A Broillet, Eur J Echocardiogr 2004 5 Suppl 2 S17 23 10.1016/S1525-2167(04)80004-0 15698556
21. Fourier phase and amplitude analysis for automated objective evaluation of myocardial contrast echocardiograms. R Bekeredjian T Hilbel A Filusch A Hansen A Benz J Zehelein HF Kuecherer, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2003 19 2 117 128 10.1023/A:1022873803754 12749392 (Pubitemid 36469225)
22. Assessment of the physiologic significance of coronary disease with dipyridamole real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography. Comparison with technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography and quantitative coronary angiography. M Peltier D Vancraeynest A Pasquet T Ay V Roelants AM D'Hondt JA Melin JL Vanoverschelde, J Am Coll Cardiol 2004 43 2 257 264 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.07.040 14736446 (Pubitemid 38201153)
23. Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for pharmacologic stress testing: is quantitative estimation of myocardial blood flow reserve necessary? G Korosoglou KG da Silva Jr N Labadze AE Dubart A Hansen M Rosenberg J Zehelein H Kuecherer, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2004 17 1 1 9 10.1016/j.echo.2003.08.004 14712180 (Pubitemid 38064108)
24. Quantitative adenosine real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for detection of angiographically significant coronary artery disease. S Malm S Frigstad H Torp R Wiseth T Skjarpe, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2006 19 4 365 372 10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.026 16581474
25. Comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography derived myocardial perfusion reserve with invasive determination of coronary flow reserve. SM Bierig P Mikolajczak SC Herrmann N Elmore M Kern AJ Labovitz, Eur J Echocardiogr 2008 18723849
26. Quantification methods in contrast echocardiography. L Agati G Tonti L Galiuto V Di Bello S Funaro MP Madonna B Garramone F Magri, Eur J Echocardiogr 2005 6 Suppl 2 S14 20 10.1016/S1525-2167(05)80724-3 16360628 (Pubitemid 43046017)
27. Handbook of Contrast Echocardiography. Left ventricular function and myocardial perfusion. H Becher P Burns, Frankfurt and New York: Springer Verlag 2000
28. Effect of destructive pulse duration on the detection of myocardial perfusion in myocardial contrast echocardiography: In vitro and in vivo observations. EB Bahlmann BM McQuillan MD Handschumacher CM Chow JL Guerrero MH Picard AE Weyman M Scherrer-Crosbie, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002 15 12 1440 1447 10.1067/mje.2002.126166 12464909 (Pubitemid 36519664)
29. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. K Wei AR Jayaweera S Firoozan A Linka DM Skyba S Kaul, Circulation 1998 97 5 473 483 9490243
30. Myocardial blood volume and perfusion reserve responses to combined dipyridamole and exercise stress: a quantitative approach to contrast stress echocardiography. S Moir BA Haluska C Jenkins D McNab TH Marwick, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005 18 11 1187 1193 10.1016/j.echo.2005.04.004 16275528 (Pubitemid 41597119)
31. EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiology. B Hesse K Tagil A Cuocolo C Anagnostopoulos M Bardies J Bax F Bengel E Busemann Sokole G Davies M Dondi, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005 32 7 855 897 10.1007/s00259-005-1779-y 15909197 (Pubitemid 41125431)
32. Stress protocols and tracers. MJ Henzlova MD Cerqueira JJ Mahmarian SS Yao, J Nucl Cardiol 2006 13 6 e80 90 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.08.011 17174798 (Pubitemid 44913649)
33. Real-time perfusion imaging: a new echocardiographic technique for simultaneous evaluation of myocardial perfusion and contraction. GT Sieswerda L Yang MB Boo O Kamp, Echocardiography 2003 20 6 545 555 10.1046/j.1540-8175.2003. 03093.x 12859369 (Pubitemid 36918772)
34. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease. Comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography and 99mTc MIBI single photon emission computed tomography. M Olszowska M Kostkiewicz W Tracz T Przewlocki, Int J Cardiol 2003 90 1 49 55 10.1016/S0167-5273(02)00475-8 12821219 (Pubitemid 36734842)
35. Parametric detection and measurement of perfusion defects in attenuated contrast echocardiographic images. S Yoshifuku S Chen E McMahon J Korinek A Yoshikawa I Ochiai PP Sengupta M Belohlavek, J Ultrasound Med 2007 26 6 739 748 17526605
36. Incremental value of parametric quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion by triggered Low-Power myocardial contrast echocardiography. EH Yu DM Skyba H Leong-Poi C Sloggett M Jamorski R Garg RM Iwanochko SC Siu, J Am Coll Cardiol 2004 43 10 1807 1813 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.073 15145104 (Pubitemid 38622519)
37. Thinking outside the "box"-the ultrasound contrast controversy. ML Main JH Goldman PA Grayburn, J Am Coll Cardiol 2007 50 25 2434 2437 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.11.006 18154971 (Pubitemid 350266276)
38. Acute mortality in hospitalized patients undergoing echocardiography with and without an ultrasound contrast agent (multicenter registry results in 4,300,966 consecutive patients). ML Main AC Ryan TE Davis MP Albano LL Kusnetzky M Hibberd, Am J Cardiol 2008 102 12 1742 1746 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.08.019 19064035
39. Acute mortality in hospitalized patients undergoing echocardiography with and without an ultrasound contrast agent: results in 18,671 consecutive studies. LL Kusnetzky A Khalid TM Khumri TG Moe PG Jones ML Main, J Am Coll Cardiol 2008 51 17 1704 1706 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.006 18436124
40. Safety and efficacy of commercially available ultrasound contrast agents for rest and stress echocardiography a multicenter experience. MS Dolan SS Gala S Dodla SS Abdelmoneim F Xie D Cloutier M Bierig SL Mulvagh TR Porter AJ Labovitz, J Am Coll Cardiol 2009 53 1 32 38 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.066 19118722
41. American Society of Echocardiography Consensus Statement on the Clinical Applications of Ultrasonic Contrast Agents in Echocardiography. SL Mulvagh H Rakowski MA Vannan SS Abdelmoneim H Becher SM Bierig PN Burns R Castello PD Coon ME Hagen, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008 21 11 1179 1201 10.1016/j.echo.2008.09.009 18992671