Corrupting the curriculum? The case of geography

London Review of Education

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 147-157

  Lambert, David ^a   Morgan, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Curriculum; Curriculum making; Education aims; Subject disciplines

Indexed keywords

EID: 68349112499     PISSN: 14748460     EISSN: 14748479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14748460902990419     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Balderstone, D. 2006. The secondary teachers handbook. Sheffield: Geographical Association.
2. DEA. 2004. Geography: The global dimension. London: Development Education Association. www.geography.org.uk/global.
3. Fitzpatrick, M. 2004. MMR and autism: What parents need to know. London: Routledge.
4. Gilbert, J. 2005. Catching the knowledge wave? The knowledge society and the future of education. Wellington: NZCER Press.
5. Furedi, F. 2002. Culture of fear. London: Continuum.
6. Furedi, F. 2004. Therapy culture: Cultivating vulnerability in an uncertain age. London: Routledge.
7. Furedi, F. 2005. Politics of fear: Beyond left and right. London: Continuum.
8. Furedi, F. 2007. Introduction: Politics, politics, politics. In The corruption of the curriculum, ed. R. Whelan. London: Civitas.
9. Hayes, D. 2005. Guide to education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
10. Hinchliffe, G. 2007a. Special issue on the concept of capability and its application to questions of equity, access and the aims of education. Prospero 13, no. 3.
11. Hinchliffe, G. 2007b. Beyond key skills: The capability approach to personal development. Prospero 13, no. 3: 5-12.
12. Huckle, J. 1983. Values education through geography: A radical critique. Journal of Geography 82: 59-63.
13. IGU-CGE. 1992. International charter for geographic education. International Geographical Union Commission on Geographic Education. http://igucge.tamu.edu/charters_1.htm.
14. Johnston, R. 1985. Introduction: Exploring the future of geography. Future of geography. London: Methuen.
15. Kelly, A.V. 1989. The curriculum: Theory and practice. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
16. Lambert, D. 2008. Why are school subjects important? Forum 50, no. 2: 208-13. www.wwwords.co.uk/ FORUM.
17. Lambert, D., and D. Balderstone. 2000. Learning to teach geography London: RoutledgeFalmer.
18. Marsden, B. 1997. On taking the geography out of geographical education. Geography 82, no. 3: 241-52.
19. Morgan, J. 2008. Curriculum development in 'new times'. Geography 93, no. 1: 17-24.
20. Morgan, J., and D. Lambert. 2005. Teaching school subjects: Geography London: Routledge.
21. Naish, M., E. Rawling, and C. Hart. 1987. Geography 16-19: The contribution of a curriculum development project to 16-19 education. London: Longman.
22. Ofsted. 2008. Geography - changing practice. Making fieldwork a focus Ref No 070044. London: Ofsted.
23. O'Keefe, P. 1986. The wayward curriculum: A cause for parents' concern? London: Social Affairs Unit.
24. Rawling, E. 2001. Changing the subject: The impact of national policy on school geography 1980-2000. Sheffield: Geographical Association.
25. Standish, A. 2005. Review of The moralization of tourism: Sun, sand and ... saving the world?, by J. Butcher. The Professional Geographer 57, no. 2: 336-7.
26. Standish, A. 2007a. Geography used to be about maps. In The corruption of the curriculum, ed. R. Whelan. London: Civitas.
27. Standish, A. 2007b. Information overload. New Start online. www.newstartmag.co.uk/features/article/information-overload.
28. Standish, A. 2009. Global perspectives in the geography curriculum: Reviewing the moral case for geography. Oxford: Routledge.
29. Taylor, P. 1993. Full circle, or new meaning for global. In The challenge for geography, ed. R.J. Johnston. Oxford: Blackwell.
30. Whelan, R. 2007. The corruption of the curriculum. London: Civitas.
31. Williams, A. 2008. The enemies of progress: The dangers of sustainability. Exeter: Imprint Academic.