Voter-ID laws discourage participation, particularly among minorities, and trigger a constitutional remedy in lost representation

PS - Political Science and Politics

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 107-110

  Sobel, Richard ^a   Smith, Robert Ellis ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Privacy Journal ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68349109523     PISSN: 10490965     EISSN: 15375935     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1049096509090271     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Albano, Jonathan, Timothy H. Madden, Jennifer Banting MikoLevine, Jason Lane, and Bingham McCutchen LLP. 2007. "Brief of Amici Curiae Cyber Policy Project, Privacy Journal, Privacy Activism, Liberty Coalition, U.S. Bill of Rights Foundation, Robbin Stewart and Joell Palmer in Support of Petitioners." Amicus Brief for the Plaintiffs in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board. 553 U.S. (2008). http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/ electionlaw/ litigation/documents/Rokita-BriefamicuscuriaeofCyberPrivacy.pdf.
2. Allen v. State Bd. Of Education. 1969. 393 U.S. 544.
3. Amar, Akhil. 2005. America's Constitution: A Biography. New York: Random House.
4. Barreto, Matt, Stephen Nuño, and Gabriel Sanchez. 2009. "The Disproportionate Impact of Voter-ID Requirements on the Electorate - New Evidence from Indiana." PS: Political Science and Politics 42 (January): 111-16.
5. Foreman, Michael J., Jon M. Greenbaum, Robert A. Kengle, Walter E. Del-linger, Sri Srinivasan, and Charles E. Borden. 2007. "Brief for the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights under Law, Service Employees International Union, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Common Cause, Jewish Council for Public Affairs, National Council of Jewish Women, and American Jewish Committee as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners." Crawford v. Marion County Election Board. 553 U.S. (2008). http://brennan.3cdn.net/91ffa0e1c41aa9b0a6-3bm6b54ig.pdf.
6. Beer v. United States. 1976. 425 U.S. 130.
7. Colorado Republican Fed. Campaign Comm. v. FEC. 1996. 518 U.S. 604.
8. Corfield v. Coryell. 1823. 6 Fed. Cas. 546.
9. Crawford v. Marion County Election Bd. 2007a. 472 F.3d 949 (7th Cir.).
10. Crawford v. Marion County Election Bd. 2007b. 484 F.3d 436 (7th Cir.) en banc.
11. Drew, Christopher. 2007. "Lower Voter Turnout Is Seen in States That Require ID." New York Times, February 21.
12. Eggen, Dan. 2005. "Criticism of Voting Law Was Overruled, Justice Department Backed Georgia Measure Despite Fears of Discrimination." Washington Post, November 17, A1.
13. Gilmore v. Gonzalez. 2006. 435 F.3d 1125 (9th Cir.).
14. Groth, William, et al. 2007. Brief for Petitioners. Indiana Democratic Party et al. v. Todd Rokita. No. 07-25. http://brennan.3cdn.net/ e715892d06ef26a6c8-rpm6bhvi8.pdf.
15. Johnson v. De Grandy. 1994. 512 U.S. 997.
16. Karlan, Pamela. 2008. "Forum." In Race, Incarceration and American Values, ed. Glenn Loury. Boston: Review Press.
17. Keyssar, Alexander. 2000. The Right to Vote, A Contested History of Democracy in The United States. New York: Basic Books.
18. Lopez v. Monterrey County. 1999. 525 U.S. 299.
19. Smith, Robert Ellis, and Richard Sobel. 2009. "Demands for Voter Identification Require a Constitutional Standard of Reasonable Suspicion of Illegal Activity." PS: Political Science and Politics 42 (January): 103-05.
20. Sobel, Richard. 2002. "The Demeaning of Identity and Personhood Under the National Identification Systems." Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 15: 319-83.
21. Slaughterhouse Cases. 1873. 83 U.S. 36.
22. Thornburg v. Gingles. 1986. 478 U.S. 30.
23. United States v. Carolene Prods. Co. 1938. 304 U.S. 144.