Cyclic response of concrete bridge columns using superelastic nitinol and bendable concrete

ACI Structural Journal

Volumn 106, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 69-77

  Saiidi, M Saiid ^a   O'Brien, Melissa ^b   Mahmoud, Sadrossadat Zadeh ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b Forbes and Dunagan   (United States)

^c Halcrow Yolles   (United States)

Author keywords

Columns; Earthquakes; Engineered cementitious composites; Residual displacement; Shape memory alloy

Indexed keywords

COLUMNS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONVENTIONAL CONCRETE; CYCLIC LOADINGS; CYCLIC RESPONSE; DRIFT CAPACITY; ENGINEERED CEMENTITIOUS COMPOSITES; INNOVATIVE MATERIALS; LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT; MAXIMUM DISPLACEMENT; PERMANENT DISPLACEMENTS; PLASTIC HINGE ZONES; PLASTIC HINGES; RESIDUAL DISPLACEMENT; SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY; STEEL REINFORCEMENTS; SUPER-ELASTIC NITINOLS; SUPERELASTIC SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY;

CONCRETE BRIDGES; CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION; EARTHQUAKES; REINFORCEMENT; SHAPE MEMORY EFFECT; STEEL;

ALLOYS;

EID: 68349104183     PISSN: 08893241     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Wilson, J. C, and Wesolowsky, M. J., "Shape Memory Alloys for Seismic Response Modification: A State-of-the-Art Review," EERI Earthquake Spectra, V. 21, No. 2, May 2005, pp. 569-601.
2. Desroches, R.; McCormick, J.; and Delemont, M., "Cyclic Properties of Superelastic Shape Memory Wires and Bars," Journal of Structural Engineering, Jan. 2004, pp. 38-46.
3. Otsuka, K., and Wayman, C. M., Shape Memory Materials, Cambridge University Press, 1999, 298 pp.
4. Li, V. C, and Lepech, M., "General Design Assumptions for Engineered Cementitious Composites," Proceedings of the International Workshop on HPFRCC in Structural Applications, Honolulu, HI, 2005, http://www.engi- neeredcomposites.com/html/publication.html. (accessed Nov. 6, 2005)
5. Lepech, M., and Li, V. C, "Durability and Long Term Performance of Engineered Cementitious Composites," Proceedings of the International Workshop on HPFRCC in Structural Applications, Honolulu, HI, May 2005, pp. 165-174.
6. Li, V. C, "Engineered Cementitious Composites," Proceedings of Con Mat '05, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Aug. 2005, http://www.engineered- composites.com/publications/Conmat05/Li(ECC).pdf. (accessed Nov. 6, 2005).
7. Mazzoni, S.; McKenna, F.; Fenves, and Filippou, F., "Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation User Manual version 1.6.2," Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, http://opensees.berkeley.edu/OpenSees/manuals/usermanual/.
8. Friedland, I., and Mayes, R., "Recommended LRFD Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Highway Bridges," MCEER Highway Project 094, Task F3-1, also published as the National Cooperative Highway Research Programs Report (NCHRP) 12-49, Sections 8.8.2 and c8.8.2.5-2., State University of New York at Buffalo, Nov. 2001.
9. Saiidi, M., and Wang, H., "An Exploratory Study of Seismic Response of Concrete Columns with Shape Memory Alloys Reinforcement," ACl Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 3, May-June 2006, pp. 436-443.
10. Mander, J. B.; Priestley, M. J. N.; and Park, R., "Theoretical Stress Strain Curve for Confined Concrete Column," Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 114, No. 8, Aug. 1988, pp. 1804-1826.
11. Paulay, T, and Priestley, M. J. N., Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1992, 768 pp.