Action sequences within and across hands: Evidence for hand-related sequence learning

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 62, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1507-1515

  Berner, Michael P ^a   Hoffmann, Joachim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Sequence learning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HAND; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LEARNING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HUMANS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SERIAL LEARNING; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 68349097182     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210902746932     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Berner, M. P., & Hoffmann, J. (2008). Effector-related sequence learning in bimanual-bisequential serial reaction time task. Psychological Research, 72, 138-154.
2. Berner, M. P., & Hoffmann, J. (2009). On the acquisition of effector-specific and effector-independent components of sequencing skill. Journal of Motor Behavior, 41, 30-44.
3. Berner, M. P., & Hoffmann, J. (in press). Integrated and independent learning of hand-related constituent sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
4. Cleeremans, A., & McClelland, J. L. (1991). Learning the structure of event sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 235-253.
5. Clegg, B. A. (2005). Stimulus-specific sequence representation in serial reaction time tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1087-1101.
6. Clegg, B. A., DiGirolamo, G. J., & Keele, S. W. (1998). Sequence learning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2, 275-281.
7. Hasbroucq, T., & Guiard, Y. (1991). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 246-266.
8. Hoffmann, J., Martin, C., & Schilling, A. (2003). Unique transitions between stimuli and responses in SRT tasks: Evidence for the primacy of response predictions. Psychological Research, 67, 160-173.
9. Hoffmann, J., Sebald, A., & Stöcker, C. (2001). Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in serial reaction time tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 470-482.
10. Jordan, M. I. (1995). The organization of action sequences: Evidence from a relearning task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 179-192.
11. Keele, S. W., Ivry, R., Mayr, U., Hazeltine, E., & Heuer, H. (2003). The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychological Review, 110, 316-339.
12. Nattkemper, D., & Prinz, W. (1997). Stimulus and response anticipation in a serial reaction task. Psychological Research, 60, 98-112.
13. Park, J.-H., & Shea, C. H. (2005). Sequence learning: Response structure and effector transfer. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 387-419.
14. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
15. Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Gomez, R. L. (1998). Attention and probabilistic sequence learning. Psychological Research, 61, 175-190.
16. Stöcker, C., & Hoffmann, J. (2004). The ideomotor principle and motor sequence acquisition: Tone effects facilitate movement chunking. Psychological Research, 68, 126-137.
17. Stöcker, C., Sebald, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2003). The influence of response-effect compatibility in a serial reaction time task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 586-703.
18. Verwey, W. B., & Clegg, B. A. (2005). Effector dependent sequence learning in the serial RT task. Psychological Research, 69, 242-251.
19. Ziessler, M. (1998). Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 962-978.
20. Ziessler, M., & Nattkemper, D. (2001). Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: Further evidence from a serial reaction task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 595-613.