Attribution of aggressor's behavior and advice to the victim in a case of domestic violence;Atribución del comportamiento del agresor y consejo a la víctima en un caso de violencia doméstica

International Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 171-180

  Valor Segura, Inmaculada ^a   Expósito, Francisca ^a   Moya, Miguel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Causal attribution; Domestic violence; Economic dependency; Social problem

Indexed keywords

EID: 68249157992     PISSN: 02134748     EISSN: 15793680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1174/021347408784135896     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ABRAMS, D., VIKI, G. T., MASSER, B. & BOHNER, G. (2003). Perception of a stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 (1), 111-125.
2. BASU, B. & FAMOYE, F. (2004). Domestic Violence against Women, and their Economic Dependence: a Count Data Análisis. Review of Political Economy,16, 457-472.
3. CORSI, J. (2003). Maltrato y abuso en el ámbito doméstico: fundamentos teóricos para el estudio de la violencia en las relaciones familiares. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
4. EXPÓSITO, F., MOYA, M. & GLICK, P. (1998). Sexismo ambivalente: medición y correlatos. Revista de Psicología Social, 13, 159-170.
5. EXPÓSITO, F., MOYA, M. &VALOR-SEGURA, I. (2004). Variables situaciones que influyen en la percepción de situaciones de violencia domestica. V Congreso de la SEPEX (Sociedad Española de Psicología Experimental), Madrid, Marzo.
6. FORBES, G. B., JOBE, R. L., WHITE, K. B., BLOESCH, E. & ADAMS-CURTIS, L. E. (2005). Perceptions of dating violence following a sexual or nonsexual betrayal of trust: Effects of gender, sexism, acceptance of rape myths, and vengeance motivation. Sex Roles, 52 (3-4), 165-173.
7. GLICK, P. & FISKE, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentianing hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
8. GOODMAN, L., DUTTON, M. A., VANKOS, N. & WEINFURT, K. (2005). Women's Resources and Use of Strategies as Risk and Protective Factors for Reabuse Over Time. Violence Against Women, 3, 311-336.
9. KALMUSS, D. S. & STRAUS, M. A. (1982). Wife's marital dependency and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 277-286.
10. KOSKI, P. R. & MANGOLD, W. D. (1988). Gender effects in attitudes about family violence. Journal of Family Violence, 3, 225-237.
11. KRISTIANSEN, C. M. & GIULIETTI, R. (1990). Perceptions of wife abuse: Effects of gender, attitudes toward women, and just-world beliefs among college students. Psichology of Women Quartely, 14, 177-189.
12. MANZANO, V. (1998). Selección de Muestras. En A. J. Rojas, J. S Fernández Prados & C. Pérez, Investigar mediante encuestas (pp. 51-97). Madrid: Síntesis.
13. MATUD, M. P. (2004). Impacto de la violencia doméstica en la salud de la mujer maltratada. Psicothema, 16, 397-401.
14. MWAMWENDA, T. S. (1999). Gender Differences in Attitudes Toward Wife Battering. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139 (6), 790-792.
15. NAYAK, M. B., BYRNE, C. A., MARTÍN, M. K. & ABRAHAM, A. G. (2003). Attitudes toward violence against women: a crossnation study. Sex Roles, 49, 333-342.
16. PIERCE, M. & HARRIS, R. J. (1993). The effect of provocation, ethnicity, and injury description of men's and women's perceptions of a wife battering incident. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 767-790.
17. RIGER, S. & KRIEGLSTEIN, M. (2000). The impact of welfare reform on men's violence against women. American Journal of Community Psychology, 5, 631-647.
18. RUSBULT, C. E. & MARTZ, J. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model análisis of non voluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 558-571.
19. RUSSELL, B. L. & TRIGG, K. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent Sexism, social dominance, and gender Roles. Sex Roles, 50(7/8), 565-573.
20. SAKALLI, N. (2001). Beliefs about wife beating among Turkish college students: the effects of patriarchy, sexism and sex differences. Sex roles, 44, 599-610
21. SAKALL-IUGURLU, N. & GLICK, P. (2003). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward women who engage in premarital sex in Turkey. The Journal of Sex Research, 40, 3, 296-302.
22. SAUNDERS, D. G., LYNCH, A. B., GRAYSON, M. & LINZ, D. (1987). Inventory of Beliefs About Wife Beating: The construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes. Violence and Victims, 2, 39-55.
23. SOLER, E., BARRETO, P. & GONZÁLEZ, R. (2005). Cuestionario de respuesta emocional a la violencia doméstica y sexual. Psicothema, 17, 267-274.
24. STRUBE, M. J. & BARBOUR, L. S. (1983). The decision to leave an abusive relationship: Economic dependence and psychological commitment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 785-793.
25. STRUBE, M. J. & BARBOUR, L. S. (1984). Factors related to the decision to leave an abusive relationship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 837-844.
26. TOLMAN, R. M. & WANG, H. (2005). Domestic Violence and Women's Employment: Fixed Effects Models of Three Waves of Women's Employment Study Data. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36, 147-158.