Designing tailored biomaterial surfaces to direct keratinocyte morphology, attachment, and differentiation

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 999-1009

  Bush, K A ^a,b   Driscoll, P F ^c   Soto, E R ^d   Lambert, C R ^d   McGimpsey, W G ^c,d   Pins, G D ^a,d  

^a Worcester Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c Worcester Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

^d WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Collagen; Extracellular matrix proteins; Keratinocytes; Self assembled monolayers; Skin substitutes

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL SURFACES; CELLULAR BINDING; CELLULAR FUNCTION; DERMAL EQUIVALENT; DESIGN FEATURES; EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX PROTEINS; FUNCTIONALIZED; INTEGRINS; KERATINOCYTES; MODEL SYSTEM; QUANTITATIVE IMAGE ANALYSIS; RE-EPITHELIALIZATION; SATURATED SURFACES; SIGNALING MECHANISMS; SIGNALING MOLECULES; SKIN SUBSTITUTES; TISSUE REGENERATION; TISSUE-ENGINEERED SCAFFOLDS;

ADSORPTION; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOMATERIALS; COLLAGEN; CONFORMATIONS; ELECTRIC CURRENTS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; SCAFFOLDS; SIGNALING; SKIN; SURFACE CHEMISTRY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

SELF ASSEMBLED MONOLAYERS;

FIBRONECTIN; INTEGRIN; SELF ASSEMBLED MONOLAYER;

ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPITHELIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; KERATINOCYTE; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TISSUE REGENERATION;

ADSORPTION; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL SHAPE; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FIBRONECTINS; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; KERATINOCYTES; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 68249157982     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32168     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Clark RA, Ghosh K, Tonnesen MG. Tissue engineering for cutaneous wounds. J Invest Dermatol 2007;127:1018-1029.
2. Boyce ST. Design principles for composition and performance of cultured skin substitutes. Burns 2001;27:523-533.
3. Ehrenreich M, Ruszczak Z. Update on tissue-engineered biological dressings. Tissue Eng 2006;12:2407-2424.
4. Yannas IV, Lee E, Orgill DP, Skrabut EM, Murphy GF. Synthesis and characterization of a model extracellular matrix that induces partial regeneration of adult mammalian skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989;86:933-937.
5. Burke JF, Yannas IV, Quinby WC Jr, Bondoc CC, Jung WK. Successful use of a physiologically acceptable artificial skin in the treatment of extensive burn injury. Ann Surg 1981;194:413-428.
6. Bell E, Sher S, Hull B, Merrill C, Rosen S, Chamson A, Asselineau D, Dubertret L, Coulomb B, Lapiere C, Nusgens B, Neveux Y. The reconstitution of living skin. J Invest Dermatol 1983;81:2s-10s.
7. Parenteau N, Sabolinski M, Prosky S, Nolte C, Oleson M, Kriwet K, Bilbo P. Biological and physical factors influencing the successful engraftment of a cultured skin substitute. Biotech Bioeng 1996;52:3-14.
8. Zacchi V, Soranzo C, Cortivo R, Radice M, Brun P, Abatangelo G. In vitro engineering of human skin-like tissue. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:187-194.
9. El-Ghalbzouri A, Lamme EN, van Blitterswijk C, Koopman J, Ponec M. The use of PEGT/PBT as a dermal scaffold for skin tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2004;25:2987-2996.
10. Sheridan RL, Tompkins RG. Skin substitutes in burns. Burns 1999;25:97-103.
11. Phillips T. New skin for old: Developments in biological skin substitutes. Arch Dermatol 1998;134:344-349.
12. Clark R. Wound repair, overview and general considerations. In: Clark R, editor. The Molecular and Cellular Biology of Wound Repair, 2nd ed. New York: Plenum Press; 1995. p 3-44.
13. Clark RAF, Singer AJ. Wound repair: Basic biology to tissue engineering. In: Lanza RP, Langer R, Vacanti J, editors. Principles of Tissue Engineering. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000. p 857-878.
14. Hynes RO. Integrins: Versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion. Cell 1992;69:11-25.
15. Miyamoto S, Akiyama SK, Yamada KM. Synergistic roles for receptor occupancy and aggregation in integrin transmembrane function. Science 1995;267:883-885.
16. Wozniak MA, Modzelewska K, Kwong L, Keely PJ. Focal adhesion regulation of cell behavior. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004;1692:103-119.
17. Geiger B, Bershadsky A, Pankov R, Yamada KM. Transmembrane crosstalk between the extracellular matrix-cytoskeleton crosstalk. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2001;2:793-805.
18. Clark RA, Lanigan JM, DellaPelle P, Manseau E, Dvorak HF, Colvin RB. Fibronectin and fibrin provide a provisional matrix for epidermal cell migration during wound reepithelialization. J Invest Dermatol 1982;79:264-269.
19. Larjava H, Salo T, Haapasalmi K, Kramer RH, Heino J. Expression of integrins and basement membrane components by wound keratinocytes. J Clin Invest 1993;92:1425-1435.
20. Clark RA, Winn HJ, Dvorak HF, Colvin RB. Fibronectin beneath reepithelializing epidermis in vivo: Sources and significance. J Invest Dermatol 1983;80(Suppl):26s-30s.
21. Bickenbach JR, Chism E. Selection and extended growth of murine epidermal stem cells in culture. Exp Cell Res 1998;244:184-195.
22. Adams JC, Watt FM. Expression of beta 1, β3, β4, and β5 integrins by human epidermal keratinocytes and non-differentiating keratinocytes. J Cell Biol 1991;115:829-841.
23. Bush KA, Downing BR, Walsh SE, Pins GD. Conjugation of extracellular matrix proteins to basal lamina analogs enhances keratinocyte attachment. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;80:444-452.
24. Boyce ST, Hansbrough JF. Biologic attachment, growth, and differentiation of cultured human epidermal keratinocytes on a graftable collagen and chondroitin-6-sulfate substrate. Surgery 1988;103:421-431.
25. Tinois E, Tiollier J, Gaucherand M, Dumas H, Tardy M, Thivolet J. In vitro and post-transplantation differentiation of human keratinocytes grown on the human type IV collagen film of a bilayered dermal substitute. Exp Cell Res 1991;193:310-319.
26. Ruoslahti E, Pierschbacher MD. Arg-Gly-Asp: A versatile cell recognition signal. Cell 1986;44:517-518.
27. Pierschbacher MD, Ruoslahti E, Sundelin J, Lind P, Peterson PA. The cell attachment domain of fibronectin. Determination of the primary structure. J Biol Chem 1982;257:9593-9597.
28. McClary KB, Ugarova T, Grainger DW. Modulating fibroblast adhesion, spreading, and proliferation using self-assembled monolayer films of alkylthiolates on gold. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;50:428-439.
29. Keselowsky BG, Collard DM, Garcia AJ. Integrin binding specificity regulates biomaterial surface chemistry effects on cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:5953-5957.
30. Garcia AJ, Vega MD, Boettiger D. Modulation of cell proliferation and differentiation through substrate-dependent changes in fibronectin conformation. Mol Biol Cell 1999;10:785-798.
31. Koenig AL, Gambillara V, Grainger DW. Correlating fibronectin adsorption with endothelial cell adhesion and signaling on polymer substrates. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;64:20-37.
32. Prime KL, Whitesides GM. Self-assembled organic monolayers: Model systems for studying adsorption of proteins at surfaces. Science 1991;252:1164-1167.
33. Mrksich M, Dike LE, Tien J, Ingber DE, Whitesides GM. Using microcontact printing to pattern the attachment of mammalian cells to self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiolates on transparent films of gold and silver. Exp Cell Res 1997;235:305-313.
34. Wang H, He Y, Ratner BD, Jiang S. Modulating cell adhesion and spreading by control of FnIII7-10 orientation on charged self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of alkanethiolates. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;77:672-678.
35. Bain C, Evall J, Whitesides GM. Formation of monolayers by the coadsorption of thiols on gold: Variation in the head group, tail group and solvent. J Am Chem Soc 1989;111:7155-7164.
36. Mrksich M. A surface chemistry approach to studying cell adhesion. Chem Soc Rev 2000;29:267-273.
37. Lee MH, Ducheyne P, Lynch L, Boettiger D, Composto RJ. Effect of biomaterial surface properties on fibronectin-α5β1 integrin interaction and cellular attachment. Biomaterials 2006;27:1907-1916.
38. Keselowsky BG, Collard DM, Garcia AJ. Surface chemistry modulates fibronectin conformation and directs integrin binding and specificity to control cell adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;66:247-259.
39. Bowditch RD, Halloran CE, Aota S, Obara M, Plow EF, Yamada KM, Ginsberg MH. Integrin α IIb β3 (platelet GPIIb-IIIa) recognizes multiple sites in fibronectin. J Biol Chem 1991;266:23323-23328.
40. Elliott JT, Tona A, Plant AL. Comparison of reagents for shape analysis of fixed cells by automated fluorescence microscopy. Cytometry A 2003;52:90-100.
41. Obedencio GP, Nuccitelli R, Isseroff RR. Involucrin-positive keratinocytes demonstrate decreased migration speed but sustained directional migration in a DC electric field. J Invest Dermatol 1999;113:851-855.
42. Simon M, Green H. Participation of membrane-associated proteins in the formation of the cross-linked envelope of the keratinocyte. Cell 1984;36:827-834.
43. Rice RH, Green H. Presence in human epidermal cells of a soluble protein precursor of the cross-linked envelope: Activation of the cross-linking by calcium ions. Cell 1979;18:681-694.
44. Scotchford CA, Gilmore CP, Cooper E, Leggett GJ, Downes S. Protein adsorption and human osteoblast-like cell attachment and growth on alkylthiol on gold self-assembled monolayers. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;59:84-99.
45. Pierschbacher MD, Hayman EG, Ruoslahti E. Location of the cell-attachment site in fibronectin with monoclonal antibodies and proteolytic fragments of the molecule. Cell 1981;26(2 Part 2):259-267.
46. Aota S, Nomizu M, Yamada KM. The short amino acid sequence Pro-His-Ser-Arg-Asn in human fibronectin enhances cell-adhesive function. J Biol Chem 1994;269:24756-24761.
47. Hynes RO. Structure of fibronectins. In: Fibronectins. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1990. p 113-175.
48. Sigal G, Mrksich M, Whitesides GM. Effect of surface wettability on the adsorption of proteins and detergents. J Am Chem Soc 1998;120:3464-3473.
49. Cutler SM, Garcia AJ. Engineering cell adhesive surfaces that direct integrin α5β1 binding using a recombinant fragment of fibronectin. Biomaterials 2003;24:1759-1770.
50. Wilson K, Stuart SJ, Garcia A, Latour RA Jr. A molecular modeling study of the effect of surface chemistry on the adsorption of a fibronectin fragment spanning the 7-10th type III repeats. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;69:686-698.
51. Adams JC, Watt FM. Changes in keratinocyte adhesion during terminal differentiation: Reduction in fibronectin binding precedes α5 β1 integrin loss from the cell surface. Cell 1990;63:425-435.
52. Grinnell F. Wound repair, keratinocyte activation and integrin modulation. J Cell Sci 1992;101(Part 1):1-5.