Prospective study of the association between neurobehavior disinhibition and peer environment on illegal drug use in boys and girls

American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 145-150

  Kirisci, Levent ^a   Mezzich, Ada C ^a   Reynolds, Maureen ^a   Tarter, Ralph E ^a   Aytaclar, Sema ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b Bakirkoy Hospital for Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Adolescence; Gender; Illegal drug involvement; Neurobehavior disinhibition; Peer deviancy

Indexed keywords

ILLICIT DRUG; STREET DRUG;

ADOLESCENT; AFFECT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CONTROL; CHILD; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG USE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PEER GROUP; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SCHOOL CHILD; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; ADDICTION; AGE; FOLLOW UP; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADOLESCENT; AGE FACTORS; CHILD; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PEER GROUP; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STREET DRUGS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 68249157182     PISSN: 00952990     EISSN: 10979891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00952990902825405     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Van Etten ML, Anthony JC. Comparative epidemiology of initial drug opportunities and transition to first use: Marijuana, cocaine, hallucinogens and heroin. Drug Alcohol Depend 1999; 54:117-125.
2. Van Etten ML, Anthony JC. Male-female differences in transition from first drug opportunity to first use: Searching for subgroup variation by age, race, region, and urban status. J Women's Health and Gender-Based Medicine 2001; 10:797-804.
3. Wagner FA, Anthony JC. Male-female differences in the risk of progression from first use to dependence upon cannabis, cocaine, and alcohol. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 86:191-198.
4. Dishion TJ, Owen LD. A longitudinal analysis of friendships and substance use: Bidirectional influence from adolescence to adulthood. Dev Psychol 2002; 38:480-491.
5. Gifford-Smith M, Dodge KA, Dision TJ, McCord J. Peer influence in children and adolescents: Crossing the bridge from developmental to intervention science. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2005; 33:255-265.
6. Agrawal A, Lynskey MT, Bucholz KK, Madden AF, Heath AC. Correlates of cannabis initiation in a longitudinal sample of young women: The importance of peer influences. Preventive Medicine 2007; 45:31-34.
7. Preston P. Marijuana use as a coping response to psychological strain: Racial, ethnic and gender differences among young adults. Deviant Beh 2006; 27:397-421.
8. Butters JE. The impact of peers and social disapproval on high-risk cannabis use: Gender differences and implications for drug education. Drugs: Education, prevention and policy 2004; 11:381-3909.
9. Siminoff E, Pickles A, Meyer JM, Silberg JL, Maes HH, Loeber R, et al. The Virginian twin study of adolescent behavioral development: Influences of age, sex, and impairment on rates of disorder. Arch Gen Psychiat 1997; 54:801-808.
10. Tarter R, Kirisci L, Ridenour T, Vanyukov M. Prediction of substance use disorder between childhood and adulthood using the internalizing and externalizing scales of the CBCL. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, in press.
11. Kirisci L, Vanyukov M, Tarter RE. Detection of youth at high risk for substance use disorders: A longitudinal study. Psychol Addict Behav 2005; 19:243-252.
12. Tarter RE, Kirisci L, Mezzich AC, Cornelius J, Pajer K, Vanyukov M, Gardner W, Blackson T, Clark DB. Neurobehavioral disinhibition in childhood predicts early age onset of substance use disorder. Am J Psychiat 2003; 60:1078-1085.
13. Tarter RE, Kirisci L, Habeych M, Reynolds M, Vanyukov M. Neurobehavior disinhibition in childhood predisposes boys to substance use disorder by young adulthood: Direct and mediated etiological pathways. Drug Alc Depend 2004; 73:121-132. (Pubitemid 38068348)
14. Mezzich AC, Tarter RE, Feske U, Kirisci L, McNamee RL, Bang-Shiuh Day BS. Assessment of risk for substance use disorder consequent to consumption of illegal drugs: Psychometric validation of the neurobehavior disinhibition trait. Psychol Addict Behav 2007; 21:508-515.
15. Kirisci L, Tarter RE, Mezzich AC, Vanyukov M. Developmental trajectory classes in substance use disorder etiology. J Addict Behav 2007; 21:287-296.
16. Kirisci L, Tarter RE, Vanyukov M., Reynolds M, Habeych M. Relation between cognitive distortions and neurobehavior disinhibition on the development of substance use during adolescence and substance use disorder by young adulthood: A prospective study. Drug Alc Depend 2004; 76:125-133.
17. Kirisci L, Tarter RE, Reynolds M, Vanyukov M. Individual differences in childhood neurobehavior disinhibition predict decision to desist substance use during adolescence and substance use disorder in young adulthood. J Addict Behav 2006; 31: 686-696.
18. Prinstein MJ, Boergers J, Spirito A. Adolescents' and their friends' healthrisk behavior: Factors that alter or add to peer influence. J Pediatric Psychol 2001; 26:287-298.
19. Maxwell PA. Friends: The role of peer influence across adolescent risk behaviors. J Youth Adol 2002; 31:267-277.
20. Musher-EizenmanDR, Holub SC, Arnett M. Attitude and peer influences on adolescent substance use: The moderating effect of age, sex, and substance. J Drug Educ 2003; 33:1-23.
21. Spitzer R,Williams B, Gibbon M. Manual for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID; 4/1/87 rev.).New York: Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1987.
22. Feske R, Tarter RE, Kirisci L, Gao Z, Reynolds M, Vanyukov M. Peer environment mediates parental history and individual risk in the etiology of cannabis use disorder in boys: A 10-year prospective study. The Am J Drug and Alc Abuse 2008; 34:307-320.
23. Center for Education and Drug Abuse Research (CEDAR). The Drug and Alcohol Use Chart. Unpublished manuscript. University of Pittsburgh, 1989.
24. Tarter RE. Evaluation and treatment of adolescent substance abuse: A decision tree method. Am J Drug Alc Abuse 1990; 16:1-46.
25. Muth́en LK, Muth́en BO. Mplus User's Guide (4th edition). Los Angeles, CA: Muth́en & Muth́en, 2001.
26. MacCallum RC, Browne, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods 1996; 1:130-149.
27. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychol Bull 1990; 107(2): 238-246.
28. Loehlin JC. Latent Variable Models (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.
29. Sobel ME. Asymptomatic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In Sociological Methodology. Leinhardt S, ed. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association 1982; pp. 290- 312.
30. Silverthorn P, Frick P. Developmental pathways to antisocial behavior: The delayed onset pathway in girls. Dev Psychopathol 1999; 11:101-126.
31. Marmorstein NR, Iacono WG. Longitudinal follow-up adolescents with late onset antisocial behavior: A pathological yet overlooked group. J Amer Acad of Child and Adolesc Psychiat 2005; 44:1284-1291.
32. Mezzich AC, Tarter RE, Giancola PR, Lu S, Kirisci L, Parks S. Substance use and risky sexual behavior in female adolescents. Drug Alc Dependence 1997; 44:157-166.
33. Mezzich AC, Giancola PR, Lu S, Parks S, Ratica GM, Dunn M. Adolescent females with a substance use disorder: Affiliation with adult male sexual partner. The Am J Addictions 1999; 8:190-200.
34. Vitaro F, Brendgen M, Tremblay RE. Influence of deviant friends on delinquency: Searching for moderator variables. J Abnormal Child Psychology 2000; 28:313-325.
35. O'Malley PM, Johnston LD. Drugs and driving by American high school seniors 2001-2006. J Studies Alc 2007; 68:834-842.
36. Loeber R. The Pittsburgh Youth Study. Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, PA, 1989.