A comparison of citizen and "expert" preferences using an attribute-based approach to choice

Ecological Economics

Volumn 68, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 2834-2841

  Colombo, S ^a   Angus, A ^b   Morris, J ^b   Parsons, D J ^b   Brawn, M ^c   Stacey, K ^b   Hanley, N ^d  

^a IFAPA CENTRO EL TORUÑO   (Spain)

^b CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c Bedfordshire County Council   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Analytical hierarchy process; Choice Experiments; Citizen preferences; Expert judgement; Price attribute; Public Rights Of Way

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DETECTION METHOD; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; INVESTMENT; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR;

EID: 68249152359     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Adamowicz W., Boxall P., Williams M., and Louviere J. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 (1998) 64-75
2. Alberini A., Longo A., and Riganti P. Using surveys to compare the public's and decisionmakers' preferences for urban regeneration: the Venice arsenale. Working paper no. 137, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (2006). http://www.feem.it/Feem/Pub/Publications/Wpapers/default.htm Available at: http://www.feem.it/Feem/Pub/Publications/Wpapers/default.htm. Accessed May 2009
3. Alvarez-Farizo B., and Hanley N. Improving the process of valuing non-market benefits: combining citizens' juries with choice modelling. Land Economics 82 3 (2006) 465-478
4. Angus A., Brawn M., Morris J., Parsons D., and Stacey K. The social and economic benefits of public rights of way - quantifying value for money. Final Report, Defra Project EPES 0506/07 (2006), Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London
5. Belton V., and Stewart T.J. Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
6. Ben-Akiva M., and Lerman S.R. Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand (1985), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
7. Bennett R.M., Tranter R.B., and Blaney R.J.P. The value of countryside access: a contingent valuation survey of visitors to the Ridgeway national trail in the United Kingdom. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46 (2003) 659-671
8. Carlsson F., Frykblom P., and Lagerkvist C. Preferences with and without prices: does the price attribute affect behavior in stated preference surveys?. Environmental and Resource Economics 38 (2007) 155-164
9. Carlsson F., Kataria M., and Lampi E. Do EPA administrators recommend environmental policies that citizens want?. Working paper. Department of Economics vol. 297 (2008), University of Gothenberg, Sweden
10. Dominick, T., McFadden, D., 1975. Urban travel demand: a behavioural approach. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
11. Fábos J.G., and Ryan R.L. Editorial: an introduction to greenway planning around the world. Landscape and Urban Planning 76 1-4 (2006) 1-6
12. Hanemann W.M. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiment with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 (1984) 332-341
13. Hanley N., Adamowicz W., and Wright R.E. Price vector effects in choice experiments: an empirical test. Resource and Energy Economics 27 3 (2005) 227-234
14. Hensher D.A., Rose J.M., and Greene W.H. Applied Choice Analysis, a Primer (2005), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
15. Krinsky I., and Robb A.L. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. The Review of Economic and Statistics 68 (1986) 715-719
16. Liston-Heyes C., and Heyes A. Recreational benefits from the Dartmoor National Park. Journal of Environmental Management 55 (1999) 69-80
17. Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., and Swait J. Stated Choice Methods, Analysis and Application (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
18. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka P. (Ed). Frontiers in Econometrics (1973), Academic Press, New York 105-142
19. Nakatani J., Aramaki T., and Hanaki K. Applying choice experiments to valuing the different types of environmental issues in Japan. Journal of Environmental Management 84 (2007) 362-376
20. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1980), McGraw-Hill, New York, USA
21. Saaty T.L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 48 (1990) 9-26
22. Turner T. Greenway planning in Britain: recent work and future plans. Landscape and Urban Planning 76 1-4 (2006) 240-251