Diversity and the fate of objectivity

Social Epistemology

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 45-56

  Freedman, Karyn L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Feminist Philosophy; Helen Longino; Objectivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 68249093049     PISSN: 02691728     EISSN: 14645297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02691720902741373     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bell, David. 1993. Objectivity. In A companion to epistemology, edited by Jonathan Dancy and Ernest Sosa, pp. 310-13. Oxford: Blackwell.
2. Brown, James Robert. 2001. Who rules in science: An opinionated guide to the wars. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
3. Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 1992. The image of objectivity. Representations 40 (1): 81-128.
4. Douglas, Heather. 2004. The irreducible complexity of objectivity. Synthese 138 (3): 453-73.
5. Haraway, Donna. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575-99.
6. Harding, Sandra. 1995. "Strong objectivity": A response to the new objectivity question. Synthese 104 (3): 331-49.
7. Kitcher, Philip. 2001. Science, truth, and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. -. 2002a. The third way: Reflections on Helen Longino's The Fate of Knowledge. Philosophy of Science 69 (4): 549-59.
9. -. 2002b. Reply to Helen Longino. Philosophy of Science 69 (4): 569-72.
10. Kuhn, Thomas. 1962/1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. -. 1977. Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In The Essential tension, pp. 320-39. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Laudan, Larry. 1981. A confutation of convergent realism. Philosophy of Science 48: 19-49.
13. Lloyd, Elizabeth. 1995. Objectivity and the double standard for feminist epistemologies. Synthese 104 (3): 351-81.
14. Longino, Helen. 1990. Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15. -. 1995. Gender, politics and theoretical virtues. Synthese 104 (3): 383-97.
16. -. 2002a. The fate of knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. -. 2002b. Science and the common good: Thoughts on Philip Kitcher's Science, Truth, and Democracy. Philosophy of Science 69 (4): 560-8.
18. -. 2002c. Reply to Philip Kitcher. Philosophy of Science 69 (4): 573-7.
19. Novick, Peter. 1988. That noble dream: The "objectivity question" and the American historical profession. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Russell, Bertrand. 1927. The analysis of matter. London: R.C. Marsh.