Magnesium-based bone cement and bone void filler: Preliminary experimental studies

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 461-464

  Schendel, Stephen A ^a   Peauroi, John ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b VDX VETERINARY DIAGNOSTICS   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone cement; Bone void filler; Cranial

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; BIOMATERIAL; BONE CEMENT; CALCIUM; FILLER; MAGNESIUM;

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE DENSITY; BONE GRAFT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; NONHUMAN; OSTEOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RABBIT; SKULL DEFECT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE CEMENTS; BONE DENSITY; BONE DISEASES; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; MAGNESIUM; MAGNESIUM COMPOUNDS; OSTEOGENESIS; PHOSPHATES; RABBITS; SKULL; SURGICAL FLAPS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 68249083080     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31819b9819     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Zins JE, Moreira-Gonzalez A, Papay FA. Use of calcium-based bone cements in the repair of large, full-thickness cranial defects: a caution. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:1332-1342 (Pubitemid 47493960)
2. Burstein FD, Williams JK Hudgins R, et al. Hydroxyapatite cement in craniofacial reconstruction: experience in 150 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:484-489
3. Honig JF, Merten HA, Nitsch A, et al. Contouring of cranial vault irregularities with hydroxyapatite cement: a clinical and experimental investigation. J Craniofac Surg 2005;3:457-460 (Pubitemid 40853086)
4. Kitano M, Taneda M. Icing and multilayering technique of injectable hydroxyapatite cement paste for cranial base reconstruction after transsphenoidal surgery: technical note. Neurosurgery 2007; 61:E53-E54 (Pubitemid 47417603)
5. Gosain AK, Riordan PA, Liansheng S, et al. A 1-year study of osteoinduction in hydroxyapatite-derived biomaterials in an adult sheep model: part II. Bioengineering implants to optimize bone replacement in reconstruction of cranial defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1155-1165
6. Costantino PD, Friedman CD, Jones K, et al. Experimental hydroxyapatite cement cranioplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;90:174-185
7. de Bruijin JD. A 1-year study of osteoinduction in hydroxyapatite-derived biomaterials in an adult sheep model: part II. Bioengineering implants to optimize bone replacement in reconstruction of cranial defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1164-1165
8. Mati DB, Manson PN. Biomechanical analyses of hydroxyapatite cement cranioplasty. J Craniofac Surg 2004;15:415-422
9. Miller A, Guera AB, Biddros RS, et al. A comparison of resistance to fracture among four commercially available forms of hydroxyapatite cement. Ann Plastic Surg 2005;55:87-92 (Pubitemid 40884804)
10. Muhonen MG, Lonyai A, Westhout FD. Hydroxyapatite cement resistant to fragmentation following cerebrospinal fluid bathing. J Craniofac Surg 2008;19:283-286 (Pubitemid 351158836)
11. Waselau M, Samii VF, Weisbrode SE, Litstey AS, Bertone AL. Effects of a magnesium adhesive cement on bone stability and healing following a metatarsal osteotomy in horses. Am J Vet Res 2007;68:370-378 (Pubitemid 46656689)