A multiperiod model of inventory competition

Operations Research

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 785-790

  Nagarajan, Mahesh ^a   Rajagopalan, S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATE MARKET; COST PARAMETERS; DECOUPLING PROPERTIES; DUOPOLY MODELS; INVENTORY COMPETITION; INVENTORY DECISIONS; INVENTORY LEVELS; MULTI-PERIOD; NASH EQUILIBRIUM; NEWSVENDOR PROBLEM; NEWSVENDORS; PERIODIC REVIEW; PRODUCT DYNAMICS; RESTRICTIVE CONDITIONS; STOCK-OUT; SUBSTITUTABLE PRODUCTS;

COMPETITION;

EID: 68149173308     PISSN: 0030364X     EISSN: 15265463     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1080.0601     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Andersen Consulting/Coca Cola Research Council. 1996. Where to look for incremental sales gains: The retail problem of out-of-stock merchandise. The Coca-Cola Retailing Research Council, Atlanta, GA.
2. Anupindi, R., Y. Bassok. 1999. Centralization of stocks: Retailers vs. manufacturer. Management Sci. 45 178-191.
3. Avsar, Z. M., M. Baykal-Gursoy. 2002. Inventory control under substitutable demand: A stochastic game application. Naval Res. Logist. 49 359-375.
4. Balvers, R., L. Szerb. 1996. Location in the Hotelling duopoly model with demand uncertainty. Eur. Econom. Rev. 40 1453-1461.
5. Bernstein, F., A. Federgruen. 2005. Decentralized supply chains with competing retailers under demand uncertainty. Management Sci. 51 18-29.
6. Cachon, G., S. Netessine. 2004. Game theory in supply chain analysis. D. Simchi-Levi, S. D. Wu, Z. Shen, eds. Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modelingin the E-Business Era, Chapter 2. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 13-66.
7. Calem, P. S., J. A. Rizzo. 1995. Competition and specialization in the hospital industry: A Hotelling location model. Southern Econom. J. 61 1182-1198.
8. Gruen, T. W., D. Corsten, S. Bharadwaj. 2002. Retail Out of Stocks: A Worldwide Examination of Causes, Rates, and Consumer Responses. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Washington, D.C.
9. Lippman, S. A., K. F. McCardle. 1997. The competitive newsvendor. Oper Res. 45 54-65.
10. Mahajan, S., G. van Ryzin. 2001. Inventory competition under dynamic consumer choice. Oper. Res. 49 646-657.
11. Netessine, S., N. Rudi. 2003. Centralized and competitive inventory models with demand substitution. Oper. Res. 51 329-335.
12. Netessine, S., N. Rudi, Y. Wang. 2003. Dynamic inventory competition and customer retention. Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
13. Parlar, M. 1988. Game theoretic analysis of the substitutable product inventory problem with random demands. Naval Res. Logist. 35 397-409.
14. Rajaram, K., C. S. Tang. 2001. The impact of product substitution on retail merchandising. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 135 582-601.
15. Smith, S. A., N. Agrawal. 2000. Management of multi-item retail inventory systems with demand substitution. Oper. Res. 48(1) 50-64.
16. Wang, Q., M. Parlar. 1994. A 3-person game theory model arising in stochastic inventory control theory. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 76 83-97.