Evaluation of biological treatment of industrial wastewater using aerobic and anaerobic respirometry

Fresenius Environmental Bulletin

Volumn 18, Issue 5 B, 2009, Pages 890-896

  Kochany, Jan ^a   Lipczynska Kochany, Ewa ^b  

^a Conestoga Rovers Associates ^*  (Canada)

^b Environmental Consultant   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aerobic respirometry; Anaerobic respirometry; Wastewater treatment

Indexed keywords

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIODEGRADATION; FORMALDEHYDE; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; OXIC CONDITIONS; RESPIRATION; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 68149167842     PISSN: 10184619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Spanjers, H., Vanrolleghem, H.P.A., Olsson, G., and Dold, P.L. (1998) Respirometry in Control of the Activated Sludge Process: Principle. International Association on Water Quality, Scientific Report. No.7, London, UK.
2. Speece, R.E. (1996) Anaerobic Biotechnology for Industrial Wastewaters. Archae Press, Nashville, TN, USA.
3. Temizsoy, A., Cetim, E. and Arayici, S. (2005) The effect of S0/X0 ratio on inert COD fraction in pharmaceutical wastewaters under aerobic and anaerobic treatment. Fresen. Environ. Bull. 14:463-467.
4. International Water Association Task Group on Mathematical Modelling for Design and Operation of Biological Wastewater (2000) IWA Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3 Treatment. Scientific and Technical Report No.9, IWA Publishing, London, UK.
5. Rozich, A.F. and Gaudy, A.F.Jr. (1992) Design and Operation of Activated Sludge Processes using Respirometry. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan, USA.
6. Copp, J.B., Spanjers, H. and Vanrolleghem P.A. Eds. (2002) Respirometry in Control of the Activated Sludge Process: Benchmarking Control Strategies. Scientific and Technical Report No. 11 IWA Task Group on Respirometry in Control of the Activated Sludge Process, IWA Publishing, London, UK.
7. Hidenari, Y., Shigeki, F., Kazya, K., Hideaki, I. Akiyoshi, O. and Hideki H. (2003), Respirometric denitrification of hydrolysis kinetics for the modelling of anaerobic municipal sludge digestion process. Proc. Envir. Eng. Res. 40:291-302.
8. Mohan, P.K. Nakhla, G. and Yanful, E.K. (2006) Biokinetics of biodegradation of surfactants under aerobic, anoxic and anaerobic conditions. Water Res. 40: 533-540.
9. Yoong, E.T., Lant, P.A. and Greenfield, P.F. (2000) In situ respirometry in an SBR treating wastewater with high phenol concentrations. Water Res. 34:239-245.
10. Tisler, T. and Zagorc-Koncan, J. (1997) Comparative assessment of toxicity of phenol, formaldehyde and industrial wastewater to aquatic organisms. Water Air Soil Pollut. 97: 315-322.
11. Oliveira, S.V.W.B. Moraes, E.M., Adorno, M.A.T. Varesche, M.B.A., Foresti, E. and Zaiat M. (2004) Formaldehyde degradation in an anaerobic packed-bed bioreactor. Water Res. 38: 1685-1694.
12. Uygur, A.and Kargi, F. (2004) Phenol inhibition of biological nutrient removal in a four-step sequencing batch reactor. Process Biochem. 39: 2123-2128.
13. Eiroa, M., Vilar, A., Amor, L., Kennes, C, and Veiga, M.C. (2005) Biodegradation and effect of formaldehyde and phenol on denitrification process. Water Res. 39:449-455.
14. Goudar, C.T., Ganji, S.H., Pujar, B. and Strevett, K.A. (2000) Substrate inhibition kinetics of phenol biodegradation. Water Environ. Res. 72: 50-55.
15. Contreras, E.M., Albertario, M.E., Bertola, N.C, and Zaritzky, N.E. (2008) Modelling phenol biodegradation by activated sludges evaluated through respirometric techniques. J. Hazard. Mater. 158: 366-374.
16. American Public Health Association (1998) Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20" Ed. Washington, DC, USA.
17. US Environmental Protection Agency, Test Methods Collection, Revised 2003. Office of Research, www.epa.gov/OSA/fem/methcollectns.htm (accessed June, 2008).
18. Melo, J. S., Kholi, S., Patwardhan A.W. and D'Sousa, S.F. (2005) Effect of oxygen transfer limitations in phenol biodegradation. Process Biochem. 40: 625-628.
19. Allsop, P.J., Moo-Young, M. and Sullivan, G.R. (1990) The Dynamics and control of substrate inhibition in activated sludge. Crit. Rev. Environ. Control 20: 115-167.
20. Lokshina, L.Y., Vavilin, V.A., Kettunen, R.H., Rintala, J.A., Holliger, C. and Nozhevnikova, A.N. (2001) Evaluation of kinetic coefficient using integrated Monod and Haldane models for low-tempeature acetoclastic methanogenesis. Wat. Res. 35:2913-2922.