Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging: Towards optimized patient information

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 182-187

  Leithner, K ^a   Pornbacher S ^a   Assem Hilger, E ^a   Krampl Bettelheim, E ^a   Prayer, D ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Anxiety; Fetal magnetic resonance imaging; Patient information; Prenatal diagnosis; Qualitative study

Indexed keywords

ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CONTENT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; EXAMINATION; FEAR; FEMALE; FETUS DISTRESS; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS MOVEMENT; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVIEW; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCEPTION; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SCANNING ELECTROCHEMICAL MICROSCOPY;

ADULT; ANXIETY; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 68149164268     PISSN: 09607692     EISSN: 14690705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/uog.6391     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Garel C. Fetal MRI: what is the future? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 123-128.
2. Leithner K, Maar A, Fischer-Kern M, Hilger E, Loffler-Stastka H, Ponocny-Seliger E. Affective state of women following a prenatal diagnosis: predictors of a negative psychological outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 240-246. (Pubitemid 38365800)
3. Kowalcek I, Mühlhoff A, Bachmann S, Gembruch U. Depressive reactions and stress related to prenatal medicine procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 18-23. (Pubitemid 34107449)
4. Leithner K, Pörnbacher S, Assem-Hilger E, Krampl E, Ponocny-Seliger E, Prayer D. Psychological reactions in women undergoing fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111: 396-402. (Pubitemid 351653431)
5. Dahl K, Kesmodel U, Hvidman L, Olesen F. Informed consent: attitudes, knowledge and information concerning prenatal examinations. Acta Obstet Gyn Scan 2006; 85: 1414-1419. (Pubitemid 44863756)
6. Cederholm M, Axelsson O, Sjödén PO. Women's knowledge, concerns and psychological reactions before undergoing an invasive procedure for prenatal karyotyping. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14: 267-272.
7. Mayring P. Qualitative Content Analysis [28 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2000; 1: [On-line Journal]. http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/fqs-texte/2-00/2- 00mayring-e.htm [Accessed 21 July 2008].
8. Krippendorff K. Content Analysis. An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage: Beverly Hills, 1980.
9. Favre R, Moutel G, Duchange N, Vayssière C, Kohler M, Bouffet N, Hunsinger MC, Kohler A, Mager C, Neumann M, Vayssière C, Viville B, Hervé C, Nisand I. What about informed consent in first-trimester ultrasound screening for Down syndrome? Fetal Diagn Ther 2008; 23: 173-184. (Pubitemid 351555838)
10. Larsen T, Nguyen TH, Munk M, Svendsen L, Teisner L. Ultrasound screening in the second trimester. The pregnant woman's background knowledge, expectations, experiences and acceptances. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15: 383-386. (Pubitemid 33111793)
11. Michel SC, Rake A, Götzmann L, Seifert B, Ferrazzini M, Chaoui R, Treiber K, Keller TM, Marincek B, Kubik-Huch RA. Pelvimetry and patient acceptability compared between open 0.5-T and closed 1.5-T MR systems. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 2898-2905. (Pubitemid 36940410)
12. Dahl K, Kesmodel U, Hvidman L, Olesen F. Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations. Acta Obstet Gyn Scan 2006; 85: 1420-1425. (Pubitemid 44863757)
13. Brand KP. How well is your patient prepared for an MRI? An insider's perspective. Cancer Nurs 1994; 17: 512-515.
14. Graham W, Smith P, Kanal A, Fitzmaurice A, Smith N, Hamilton N. Randomised controlled trial comparing effectiveness of touch screen system with leaflet for providing women with information on prenatal tests. BMJ 2000; 320: 155-160. (Pubitemid 30179366)
15. Glazier R, Goel V, Holzapfel S, Summers A, Pugh P, Yeung M. Written patient information about tripel-marker screening: a randomised controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 769-774. (Pubitemid 27449731)
16. Marteau TM, Kidd J, Michie S, Cook R, Johnston M, Shaw RW. Anxiety, knowledge and satisfaction in women receiving false positive results on routine prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 14: 185-196. (Pubitemid 23303221)
17. O'Cathain A, Walters SJ, Nicholl JP, Thomas KJ, Kirkham M. Use of evidence based leaflets to promote informed choice in maternity care: randomised controlled trial in everyday practice. BMJ 2002; 324: 643-647. (Pubitemid 34234966)
18. Lalor JG Devane D, Begley CM. Unexpected diagnosis of fetal abnormality: women's encounters with caregivers. Birth 2007; 34: 80-88.
19. Shellock FG. Pregnant patients and MR procedures. In Reference Manual for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Implants, and Devices: 2008 edn. Biomedical Research Publishing Company: Los Angeles, CA, 2008; 108-114.