Difference in sensitivity to culture condition between in vitro fertilized and somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos in pigs

Journal of Reproduction and Development

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 299-304

  Yamanaka, Ken Ichi ^a   Sugimura, Satoshi ^a   Wakai, Takuya ^a,b   Kawahara, Manabu ^a,c   Sato, Eimei ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^c SAGA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Apoptosis; In vitro embryo culture; Miniature pig; Nuclear transfer

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL EMBRYO; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; CHEMISTRY; CULTURE MEDIUM; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG RESISTANCE; EMBRYO CULTURE; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EVALUATION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; PHYSIOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; SWINE;

ANIMALS; APOPTOSIS; CELLS, CULTURED; CULTURE MEDIA; DRUG RESISTANCE; EMBRYO CULTURE TECHNIQUES; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; NUCLEAR TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; SWINE;

SUIDAE;

EID: 68149157323     PISSN: 09168818     EISSN: 13484400     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1262/jrd.20174     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Prather RS, Tao T, Machaty Z. Development of the techniques for nuclear transfer in pigs. Theriogenology 1999; 51: 487-498.
2. Lai L, Kolber-Simonds D, Park KW, Cheong HT, Greenstein JL, Im GS, Samuel M, Bonk A, Rieke A, Day BN, Murphy CN, Carter DB, Hawley RJ, Prather RS. Production of alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout pigs by nuclear transfer cloning. Science 2002; 295: 1089-1092.
3. Bollen P, Ellegaard L. The Gottingen minipig in pharmacology and toxicology. Pharmacol Toxicol 1997; 80 (Suppl 2): 3-4.
4. Prather RS, Hawley RJ, Carter DB, Lai L, Greenstein JL. Transgenic swine for bio- medicine and agriculture. Theriogenology 2003; 59: 115-123.
5. Wakai T, Sugimura S, Yamanaka K, Kawahara M, Sasada H, Tanaka H, Ando A, Kobayashi E, Sato E. Production of viable cloned miniature pig embryos using oocytes derived from domestic pig ovaries. Cloning Stem Cells 2008; 10: 249-262.
6. Kikuchi K, Onishi A, Kashiwazaki N, Iwamoto M, Noguchi J, Kaneko H, Akita T, Nagai T. Successful piglet production after transfer of blastocysts produced by a modified in vitro system. Biol Reprod 2002; 66: 1033-1041.
7. Yoshioka K, Suzuki C, Itoh S, Kikuchi K, Iwamura S, Rodriguez-Martinez H. Production of piglets derived from in vitro-produced blastocysts fertilized and cultured in chemically defined media: effects of theophylline, adenosine, and cysteine during in vitro fertilization. Biol Reprod 2003; 69: 2092-2099.
8. Coy P, Romar R. In vitro production of pig embryos: a point of view. Reprod Fertil Dev 2002; 14: 275-286.
9. Marchal R, Feugang JM, Perreau C, Venturi E, Terqui M, Mermillod P. Meiotic and developmental competence of prepubertal and adult swine oocytes. Theriogenology 2001; 56: 17-29.
10. Ozawa M, Nagai T, Fahrudin M, Karja NW, Kaneko H, Noguchi J, Ohnuma K, Kikuchi K. Addition of glutathione or thioredoxin to culture medium reduces intracellular redox status of porcine IVM/IVF embryos, resulting in improved development to the blastocyst stage. Mol Reprod Dev 2006; 73: 998-1007.
11. Day BW. Mutants yield a pharmacophore model for the tubulin-paclitaxel binding site. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2000; 21: 321-324.
12. Kikuchi K, Kashiwazaki N, Noguchi J, Shimada A, Takahashi R, Hirabayashi M, Shino M, Ueda M, Kaneko H. Developmental competence, after transfer to recipients, of porcine oocytes matured, fertilized, and cultured in vitro. Biol Reprod 1999; 60: 336-340.
13. Machaty Z, Day BN, Prather RS. Development of early porcine embryos in vitro and in vivo. Biol Reprod 1998; 59: 451-455.
14. Pomar FJ, Teerds KJ, Kidson A, Colenbrander B, Tharasanit T, Aguilar B, Roelen BA. Differences in the incidence of apoptosis between in vivo and in vitro produced blastocysts of farm animal species: a comparative study. Theriogenology 2005; 63: 2254-2268.
15. Heindryckx B, Rybouchkin A, Van Der Elst J, Dhont M. Effect of culture media on in vitro development of cloned mouse embryos. Cloning 2001; 3: 41-50.
16. Petters RM, Wells KD. Culture of pig embryos. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1993; 48: 61-73.
17. Dobrinsky JR, Johnson LA, Rath D. Development of a culture medium (BECM-3) for porcine embryos: effects of bovine serum albumin and fetal bovine serum on embryo development. Biol Reprod 1996; 55: 1069-1074.
18. Yoshioka K, Suzuki C, Tanaka A, Anas IM, Iwamura S. Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium. Biol Reprod 2002; 66: 112-119.
19. Nanassy L, Lee K, Javor A, Machaty Z. Effects of activation methods and culture conditions on development of parthenogenetic porcine embryos. Anim Reprod Sci 2008; 104: 264-274.
20. Im GS, Lai L, Liu Z, Hao Y, Wax D, Bonk A, Prather RS. In vitro development of pre- implantation porcine nuclear transfer embryos cultured in different media and gas atmospheres. Theriogenology 2004; 61: 1125-1135.
21. Suzuki C, Iwamura S, Yoshioka K. Birth of piglets through the non-surgical transfer of blastocysts produced in vitro. J Reprod Dev 2004; 50: 487-491.
22. Suzuki C, Yoshioka K. Effects of amino acid supplements and replacement of polyvinyl alcohol with bovine serum albumin in porcine zygote medium. Reprod Fertil Dev 2006; 18: 789-795.
23. Sturmey RG, Leese HJ. Energy metabolism in pig oocytes and early embryos. Reproduction 2003; 126: 197-204.
24. Gandhi AP, Lane M, Gardner DK, Krisher RL. Substrate utilization in porcine embryos cultured in NCSU23 and G1.2/G2.2 sequential culture media. Mol Reprod Dev 2001; 58: 269-275.
25. Gardner DK. Changes in requirements and utilization of nutrients during mammalian preimplantation embryo development and their significance in embryo culture. Theriogenology 1998; 49: 83-102.
26. Yamanaka K, Sugimura S, Wakai T, Shoji T, Kobayashi J, Sasada H, Sato E. Effect of activation treatments on actin filament distribution and in vitro development of miniature pig somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. J Reprod Dev 2007; 53: 791-800.
27. Miyoshi K, Umezu M, Sato E. Effect of hyaluronic acid on the development of porcine 1-cell embryos produced by a conventional or new in vitro maturation/fertilization system. Theriogenology 1999; 51: 777-784.
28. Enright BP, Lonergan P, Dinnyes A, Fair T, Ward FA, Yang X, Boland MP. Culture of in vitro produced bovine zygotes in vitro vs in vivo: implications for early embryo development and quality. Theriogenology 2000; 54: 659-673.
29. Drost M, Ambrose JD, Thatcher MJ, Cantrell CK, Wolfsdorf KE, Hasler JF, Thatcher WW. Conception rates after artificial insemination or embryo transfer in lactating dairy cows during summer in Florida. Theriogenology 1999; 52: 1161-1167.
30. Farin PW, Piedrahita JA, Farin CE. Errors in development of fetuses and placentas from in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology 2006; 65: 178-191.
31. Lazzari G, Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, Duchi R, Kruip T, Niemann H, Galli C. Cellular and molecular deviations in bovine in vitro-produced embryos are related to the large offspring syndrome. Biol Reprod 2002; 67: 767-775.
32. Gardner DK, Leese HJ. The role of glucose and pyruvate transport in regulating nutrient utilization by preimplantation mouse embryos. Development 1988; 104: 423-429.
33. Kim JH, Funahashi H, Niwa K, Okuda K. Glucose requirement at different developmental stages of in vitro fertilized bovine embryos cultured in semi-defined medium. Theriogenology 1993; 39: 875-886.
34. Schini SA, Bavister BD. Two-cell block to development of cultured hamster embryos is caused by phosphate and glucose. Biol Reprod 1988; 39: 1183-1192.
35. Seshagiri PB, Bavister BD. Glucose and phosphate inhibit respiration and oxidative metabolism in cultured hamster eight-cell embryos: evidence for the crabtree effect. Mol Reprod Dev 1991; 30: 105-111.
36. Scott L, Whittingham DG. Influence of genetic background and media components on the development of mouse embryos in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 1996; 43: 336-346.
37. Quinn P. Enhanced results in mouse and human embryo culture using a modified human tubal fluid medium lacking glucose and phosphate. J Assist Reprod Genet 1995; 12: 97-105.
38. Ankrah NA, Appiah-Opong R. Toxicity of low levels of methylglyoxal: depletion of blood glutathione and adverse effect on glucose tolerance in mice. Toxicol Lett 1999; 109: 61-67.
39. Park YS, Suzuki K, Taniguchi N, Gutteridge JM. Glutathione peroxidase-like activity of caeruloplasmin as an important lung antioxidant. FEBS Lett 1999; 458: 133-136.
40. Thompson JG, Partridge RJ, Houghton FD, Cox CI, Leese HJ. Oxygen uptake and carbohydrate metabolism by in vitro derived bovine embryos. J Reprod Fertil 1996; 106: 299-306.
41. Iwasaki T, Kimura E, Totsukawa K. Studies on a chemically defined medium for in vitro culture of in vitro matured and fertilized porcine oocytes. Theriogenology 1999; 51: 709-720.
42. Gardner DK, Lane M. Amino acids and ammonium regulate mouse embryo development in culture. Biol Reprod 1993; 48: 377-385.
43. Takahashi Y, First NL. In vitro development of bovine one-cell embryos: Influence of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, amino acids and vitamins. Theriogenology 1992; 37: 963-978.
44. Liu Z, Foote RH. Effects of amino acids on the development of in-vitro matured/in- vitro fertilization bovine embryos in a simple protein-free medium. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 2985-2991.
45. Van Thuan N, Harayama H, Miyake M. Characteristics of preimplantational development of porcine parthenogenetic diploids relative to the existence of amino acids in vitro. Biol Reprod 2002; 67: 1688-1698.
46. Biggers JD, McGinnis LK, Lawitts JA. One-step versus two-step culture of mouse preimplantation embryos: is there a difference? Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 3376-3384.
47. Hao Y, Lai L, Mao J, Im GS, Bonk A, Prather RS. Apoptosis and in vitro development of preimplantation porcine embryos derived in vitro or by nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod 2003; 69: 501-507.
48. Chung YG, Mann MR, Bartolomei MS, Latham KE. Nuclear-cytoplasmic tug of war during cloning: effects of somatic cell nuclei on culture medium preferences of preimplantation cloned mouse embryos. Biol Reprod 2002; 66: 1178-1184.
49. Boiani M, Gentile L, Gambles VV, Cavaleri F, Redi CA, Scholer HR. Variable reprogramming of the pluripotent stem cell marker Oct4 in mouse clones: distinct developmental potentials in different culture environments. Stem Cells 2005; 23: 1089-1104.