Determination of chlorophyll-a amount in Golden Horn, Istanbul, Turkey using IKONOS and in situ data

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volumn 155, Issue 1-4, 2009, Pages 83-90

  Ormeci, C ^a   Sertel, Elif ^a   Sarikaya, O ^b  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b GIS and IT Department   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Chlorophyll a; IKONOS; Linea rregression; Remote sensing

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CHLOROPHYLL-A; DERIVED DATA; GOLDEN HORN; GROUND MEASUREMENTS; IKONOS; IKONOS IMAGERY; IKONOS SATELLITE; IN-SITU DATA; IN-SITU MEASUREMENT; ISTANBUL , TURKEY; LINEA RREGRESSION; MULTIVARIATE REGRESSION MODELS; OPTIMUM DESIGNS; REGRESSION COEFFICIENT; REMOTELY SENSED IMAGES; SAMPLING LOCATION; SATELLITE IMAGE DATAS; WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS;

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEASUREMENTS; PORPHYRINS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REMOTE SENSING; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY;

CHLOROPHYLL;

CHLOROPHYLL A;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CHLOROPHYLL A; IKONOS; IN SITU MEASUREMENT; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE DATA; SATELLITE SENSOR; WATER QUALITY;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REMOTE SENSING; SENSOR; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); WATER QUALITY; WATER SAMPLING;

CHLOROPHYLL; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS; TURKEY; WATER;

EURASIA; GOLDEN HORN; ISTANBUL [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 68149150803     PISSN: 01676369     EISSN: 15732959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-008-0419-y     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Alp, M., & Cigizoglu, H. K. (2007). Suspended sediment load simulation by two artificial neural network methods using hydrometeorological data. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 2-13.
2. Cigizoglu, H. K., & Kisi, O. (2005). Flow prediction by three back propagation techniques using k-fold partitioning of neural network training data. Nordic Hydrology, 36, 49-64.
3. Cracknell, A. P., Newcombe, S. K., Black, A. F., & Kirby, N. E. (2001). The ADMAP (algal bloom detection, monitoring and prediction) concerted action. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22, 205-247.
4. Crist, E. P., & Cicone, R. C. (1984). A physically-based transformation of thematic mapper data - the tasseled cap. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 22, 256-263.
5. Dekker, A. G., Vos, R. J., & Peters, S. W. M. (2001). Comparison of remote sensing data, model results and in situ data for total suspended matter (TSM) in the southern Frisian lakes. The Science of the Total Environment, 268, 197-214.
6. EPA (2007). U. S. Environmental Protection Agency web page. http://www.epa.gov/.
7. Goddijn, L. M., & White, M. (2006). Using a digital camera for water quality measurements in Galway Bay Estuarine. Coastal and Shelf Science, 66, 429-436.
8. Herut, B., Tibor, G., Yacobi, Y. Z., & Kress, N. (1999). Synoptic measurements of chlorophyll-a and suspended particulate matter in a transitional zone from polluted to clean seawater utilizing airborne remote sensing and ground measurements, Haifa Bay. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 38, 762-772.
9. Lathrop, R. G., & Lillesand, T. M. (1989). Monitoring water quality and river plume transport in Green Bay, Lake Michigan with SPOT-1 imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 55, 349-354.
10. Lillesand, T. M., Johnson, W. L., Deuell, R. L., Lindstrom, O. M., & Meisner, D. E. (1983). Use of Landsat Data to predict the trophic state of Minnesota Lakes. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 49, 219-229.
11. Lindell, T., Pierson, D., Premazzi, G., & Zilioli, E. (1999). Manual for monitoring European lakes using remote sensing techniques EUR report (Vol. 18665). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (EN).
12. Linsley, R. K., Kohler, M. A., & Paulhus, J. L. H. (1975). Hydrology for engineers, 2nd ed. London: McGraw-Hill.
13. Phinn, S. R., Dekker, A. G., Brando, V. E., & Roelfsema, C. M. (2005). Mapping water quality and substrate cover in optically complex coastal and reef waters: An integrated approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 51, 459-469.
14. Pozdnyakov, D., Shuchman, R., Korosov, A., & Hatt, C. (2005). Operational algorithm for the retrieval of water quality in the Great Lakes. Remote Sensing of Environment, 97, 352-370.
15. Richter, R. (1996). Atmospheric correction of satellite data with haze removal including a haze/clear transition region. Computers & Geosciences, 22, 675-681.
16. Sarikaya, O. V. (2006). IKONOS uydu g oruntusuyle Halic'te su kalitesi analizi. MSc thesis, Istanbul Technical University, pp. 119-123 (in Turkish).
17. Sawaya, K. E., Olmanson, V., Heinert, N. J., Brezonik, P. L., & Bauer, M. E. (2003). Extending satellite remote sensing to local scales: Land and water resource monitoring using high-resolution imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 88, 144-156.
18. Sertel, E., Kutoglu, S. H., & Kaya, S. (2007). Geometric correction accuracy of different satellite sensor images: Application of figure condition. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28 (20), 4685-4692.
19. Space Imaging (2004). IKONOS imagery products and product guide, pp. 2-3.
20. USGS (2007). U.S. Geological Survey web page. http://www.usgs.gov/.
21. Zhang, Y., Guindon, B., & Cihlar, J. (2002). An image transform to characterize and compensate for spatial variations in thin cloud contamination of Landsat images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 82, 173-187.