Using wikis to promote quality learning in teacher training

Learning, Media and Technology

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-10

  Wheeler, Steve ^a   Wheeler, Dawn ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^b Saltashnet Community School   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Academic writing; Collaborative writing; Web 2.0; Wikis

Indexed keywords

EID: 68149137386     PISSN: 17439884     EISSN: 17439892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17439880902759851     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Benn, R. 1995. Higher education: Non-standard students and withdrawals. Journal of Further and Higher Education 19, no. 3: 3-12.
2. Bourner, T., R. Barnett, M. Hamed, and A. Reynolds. 1991. Part-time students and their experience of higher education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.
3. Carrington, V. 2005. Txting: The end of civilization (again)? Cambridge Journal of Education 35, no. 2: 161-75.
4. Crystal, D. 2006. Language and the internet. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Fairbairn, G.J., and C. Winch. 1992. Reading, writing and reasoning: A guide for students. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.
6. Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
7. Horizon Report. 2007. The Horizon Report 2007. http://www.nmc.org/pdf/ 2007-Horizon-Report.pdf (accessed March 20, 2008).
8. Johnston, V. 1997. Why do first year students fail to progress to their second year? An academic staff perspective. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of York, September 11-14. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-41
9. Jonassen, D.H., K.L. Peck, and B.G. Wilson. 1999. Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
10. Kamel Boulos, M.N., I. Maramba, and S. Wheeler. 2006. Wikis, blogs and podcasts: A new generation of web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Medical Education 6, no. 41. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-41.
11. Kamel Boulos, M.N., and S. Wheeler. 2007. The emerging Web 2.0 social software: An enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and healthcare education. Health Information and Libraries Journal 24, no. 1: 2-23.
12. Kimber, K., and C. Wyatt-Smith. 2006. Using and creating knowledge with new technologies: A case for students-as-designers. Learning, Media and Technology 31, no. 1: 19-34.
13. Kress, G. 2003. Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
14. Lankshear, C., and M. Knobel. 2006. New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
15. Miller, H. 1995. The presentation of self in electronic life: Goffman on the internet. Paper presented at the Embodied Knowledge and Virtual Space Conference, Goldsmiths' College, University of London. http://www.ntu.ac.uk/soc/ psych/miller/goffman.htm (accessed September 10, 2007).
16. Northedge, A. 1990. The good study guide. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
17. O'Reilly, T. 2004. Open source paradigm shift. http://tim.oreilly.com/articles/paradigmshift-0504.html (accessed February 15, 2007).
18. Richardson, W. 2006. Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
19. Shortis, T. 2005. The language of ICT. London: Routledge.
20. Shortis, T. 2007. Gr8 txtpectations: The creativity of text spelling. English Drama Media Journal, June: 21-6.
21. Street, B.V. 1984. Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Thurlow, C., L. Lengel, and A. Tomic. 2004. Computer mediated communication: Social interaction and the internet. London: Sage.
23. Wheeler, S., and N. Whitton, eds. 2007. Beyond control: Social software for the network generation. Research proceedings of the Association for Learning Technology Conference (ALT-C 2007), University of Nottingham, September 4-6.
24. Wheeler, S., P. Yeomans, and D. Wheeler. 2008. The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating student generated content for collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 39, no. 6: 987-95.