Three dimensional measurement of rhinoplasty results

Rhinology

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 121-125

  Van Heerbeek, Niels ^a   Ingels, Koen J A O ^a   Van Loon, Bram ^a   Plooij, Joanneke M ^a   Bergé, Stefaan J ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

3D; Hump reduction; Maxillofacial surgery; Nose; Rhinoplasty; Stereophotogrammetry; Three dimensional

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHOTOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PHOTOGRAMMETRY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RHINOPLASTY;

EID: 68149116105     PISSN: 03000729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Crumley RL, Lanser M. Quantitative analysis of nasal tip projection. Laryngoscope 1988; 98: 202-208.
2. Goode RL. A method of tip projection measurement. In: Powell N, Humphrey B, editors. Proportions of the Aesthetic Face. New York: Thieme-Stratton Inc; 1984. p. 15-39.
3. Erdem T, Ozturan O. Objective measurement of the deviated nose and a review of surgical techniques for correction. Rhinology 2008; 46: 56-61.
4. Hajeer MY, Millett DT, Ayoub AF, Siebert JP. Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: part I. J Orthod 2004; 31: 62-70.
5. Halazonetis DJ. Acquisition of 3-dimensional shapes from images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119: 556-560.
6. Beard LF, Burke PH. Evolution of a system of stereophotogram-metry for the study of facial morphology. Med Biol Illus 1967; 17: 20-25.
7. Burke PH, Beard FH. Stereophotogrammetry of the face. A preliminary investigation into the accuracy of a simplified system evolved for contour mapping by photography. Am J Orthod 1967; 53: 769-782.
8. Kau CH, Richmond S, Incrapera A, English J, Xia JJ. Three-dimensional surface acquisition systems for the study of facial morphology and their application to maxillofacial surgery. Int J Med Robot 2007; 3: 97-110.
9. Ingels K, Orhan KS. Measurement of preoperative and postoperative nasal tip projection and rotation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006; 8: 411-415.
10. Daudia A, Alkhaddour U, Sithole J, Mortimore S. A prospective objective study of the cosmetic sequelae of nasal septal surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 2006; 126: 1201-1205.
11. Okur E, Yildirim I, Aydogan B, Akif KM. Outcome of surgery for crooked nose: an objective method of evaluation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2004; 28: 203-207.
12. Sharp HR, Rowe-Jones JM. Assessing outcome in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2003; 28: 430-435.
13. Sporri S, Simmen D, Briner HR, Jones N. Objective assessment of tip projection and the nasolabial angle in rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004; 6: 295-298.
14. Ingels K, Orhan KS. Measuring nasal tip and lobule width; effect of transdomal and lateral crura suturing. Rhinology 2007; 45: 79-82.
15. Ayoub AF, Xiao Y, Khambay B, Siebert JP, Hadley D. Towards building a photo-realistic virtual human face for craniomaxillofa-cial diagnosis and treatment planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36: 423-428.
16. Weinberg SM, Naidoo S, Govier DP, Martin RA, Kane AA, Marazita ML. Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the Genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry. J Craniofac Surg 2006; 17: 477-483.
17. Aldridge K, Boyadjiev SA, Capone GT, DeLeon VB, Richtsmeier JT. Precision and error of three-dimensional phenotypic measures acquired from 3dMD photogrammetric images. Am J Med Genet A 2005 15; 138: 247-253.