Can sensory and/or motor reactions during percutaneous nerve evaluation predict outcome of sacral nerve modulation?

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 52, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1423-1426

  Govaert, B ^a   Melenhorst, J ^a   Van Gemert, W G ^a   Baeten, C G ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Motor response; Nerve modulation; Percutaneous nerve evaluation; Predictive value; Sacral nerve stimulation; Sensory response

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR NERVE; NERVE POTENTIAL; NERVE STIMULATION; PREDICTION; SENSORY NERVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ANAL CANAL; BACK; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FOLLOW UP; INNERVATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PELVIS FLOOR; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSORY RECEPTOR; TRANSCUTANEOUS NERVE STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANAL CANAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PELVIC FLOOR; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SACROCOCCYGEAL REGION; SENSORY RECEPTOR CELLS; TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRIC NERVE STIMULATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 68149101519     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: 15300358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a91241     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, Gall FP. Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of fecal incontinence. Lancet 1995;346:1124-1127
2. Melenhorst J, Koch SM, Uludag O, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG. Sacral neuromodulation in patients with fecal incontinence: results of the first 100 permanent implantations. Colorectal Dis 2007;9:725-730
3. Leroi AM, Parc Y, Lehur PA, et al. Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a multicenter doubleblind crossover study. Ann Surg 2005;242:662-669
4. Pillinger SH, Gardiner A, Duthie GS. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dig Surg 2005;22:1-5.
5. Kenefick NJ, Vaizey CJ, Cohen CG, Nicolls RJ, Kamm MA. Medium-term results of permanent sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2002;89:896-901.
6. Cohen BL, Tunuguntla HS, Gousse A. Predictors of success for first stage neuromodulation: motor versus sensory response. J Urol 2006;175:2178-2181
7. Schmidt RA, Senn E, Tanagho EA. Functional evaluation of sacral nerve root integrity. Urology 1990;35:388-392
8. Hetzer FH, Hahnloser D, Clavien PA, Demartines N. Quality of life and morbidity after permanent sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Arch Surg 2007;142:8-13.
9. Hetzer FH, Hahnloser D, Knoblauch Y, Löhlein F, Demartines N. New screening technique for sacral nerve stimulation under local anaesthesia. Tech Coloproctol 2005;9:25-28
10. Conaghan P, Farouk R. Sacral nerve stimulation can be successful in patients with ultrasound evidence of external anal sphincter disruption. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1610-1614
11. Tjandra JJ, Lim JF, Matzel K. Sacral nerve stimulation: an emerging treatment for fecal incontinence. ANZ J Surg 2004;74: 1098-1106 (Pubitemid 40006995)
12. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Petrolino M, et al. Reliability of electrophysiologic anal tests in predicting the outcome of sacral nerve modulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:853-857
13. Dudding TC, Pares D, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA. Predictive factors for successful sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence: a 10-year cohort analysis. Colorectal Dis 2007;10: 249-256
14. Ganio E, Masin A, Ratto C, et al. Short-term sacral nerve stimulation for functional anorectal and urinary disturbances: results in 40 patients: evaluation of a new option for anorectal functional disorders. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:1261-1267
15. Rosen HR, Urbarz C, Holzer B, Novi G, Schiessel R. Sacral nerve stimulation as a treatment for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 2001;121:536-541
16. Vaizey CA, Kamm MA, Turner IC, Nicholls RJ, Woloszko J. Effects of short term sacral nerve stimulation on anal and rectal function in patients with anal incontinence. Gut 1999;44: 407-412
17. Leroi AM, Michot F, Grise P, Denis P. Effect of sacral nerve stimulation in patients with fecal and urinary incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:779-789
18. Malouf AJ, Vaizey CJ, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Permanent sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Ann Surg 2000;232: 143-148
19. Koch SM, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG. Determination of therapeutic threshold in sacral nerve modulation for fecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2005;92:83-87
20. O'Connell R. The role of cortical awareness. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Colorectal Disease Symposium. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Cleveland Clinic Florida: 2008.
21. Uludag O, Darby M, Dejong CH, Schouten WR, Baeten CG. Sacrale neuromodulatie effectief bij fecale incontinentie en intacte kringspieren: een prospectieve studie. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2002;146:989-993
22. Blok BF, Groen J, Bosch R, Veltman DJ, Lammerstma AA. Different brain effects during chronic and acute sacral neuromodulation in urge incontinent patients with implanted neurostimulators. BJU Int 2006;98:1238-1243
23. Vodusek DB. Anatomy and neurocontrol of the pelvic floor. Digestion 2004;69:87-92.
24. Marani E, Pijl ME, Kraan MC, Lucklama A, Nijeholt GAB, Videleer AC. Interconnection of the upper ventral rami of the human sacral plexus: a reappraisal for dorsal rhizotomy in neurostimulation operations. Neurourol Urodyn 1993;12: 585-598