Urban environments: Issues on the peri-urban fringe

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volumn 33, Issue , 2008, Pages 167-185

  Simon, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Livelihoods; Planning and development; Production systems; Rural urban fringe; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

LIVELIHOODS; PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; RURAL-URBAN FRINGE; SUSTAINABILITY;

PRODUCTION ENGINEERING; RURAL AREAS;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 68049143330     PISSN: 15435938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.environ.33.021407.093240     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Berry BJ. 1973. The Human Consequences of Urbanisation. London: Macmillan. 205 pp.
2. Christopher AJ. 1977. Early settlement and the cadastral framework. In Salisbury; a Geographical Survey of the Capital of Rhodesia, ed. G Kay, M Smout, pp. 14-25. London: Hodder & Stoughton. 119 pp.
3. Fielding AJ. 1989. Migration and urbanization in Western Europe since 1950. Geogr. J. 155(1):60-69
4. Champion AJ. 1999. Urbanization and counterurbanization. In Applied Geography: An Introduction to Useful Research in Physical, Environmental and Human Geography, ed.MPacione, pp. 347-357. London/NewYork: Routledge. 664 pp.
5. Garreau J. 1991. Edge City: Life on the New Frontier. New York: Doubleday/Anchor. 548 pp.
6. Ginsberg N, Koppel B, McGee T, eds. 1991. The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia. Honolulu: Hawaii Univ. Press
7. Parnwell MJ,Wongsuphasawat L. 1997. Between the global and the local: extended metropolitanisation and industrial decision making in Thailand. Third World Plan. Rev. 19(2):119-138
8. Wang MYL. 1997. The disappearing rural-urban boundary: rural socioeconomic transformation in the Shenyang-Dalian region of China. Third World Plan. Rev. 19(3):229-250
9. Douglass M. 1998. A regional network strategy for reciprocal rural-urban linkages: an agenda for policy research with reference to Indonesia. Third World Plan. Rev. 20(1):1-33
10. Kelly PF. 1998. The politics of urban-rural relations: land use conversions in the Philippines. Environ. Urban. 10(1):35-54
11. Dávila J. 2006. Falling between stools? Policies, strategies and the peri-urban interface. See Ref. 75, pp. 44-56
12. Simon D. 2001. Veränderungen von urban-ländlichen Zonen in Afrikanishcen Städten. Peripherie 81/82:138-161
13. Simon D, McGregor D, Thompson D. 2006. Contemporary perspectives on the peri-urban zones of cities in developing areas. See Ref. 75, pp. 1-17
14. Brook R, D́avila J, eds. 2000. The Peri-Urban Interface: A Tale of Two Cities. Bangor/London: Univ.Wales, Dev. Plan. Unit, Univ. Coll. London
15. Mbiba B, Huchzermeyer M. 2002. Contentious development: peri-urban studies in sub-Saharan Africa. Prog. Devel. Studs. 2(2):113-131
16. Simon D, McGregor D, Nsiah-Gyabaah K. 2004. The changing urban-rural interface of African cities: definitional issues and an application to Kumasi, Ghana. Environ. Urban. 16(1):235-247
17. Montgomery MR, Stren R, Cohen B, Reed HE, eds. 2003. Cities Transformed: Demographic Change and Its Implications in the Developing World.Washington, DC/London: Natl. Acad. Sci./Earthscan. 560 pp.
18. Phillips D, Williams K, Andrews G, Clarke J, Carter M, et al. 1999. Literature review on peri-urban natural resource conceptualisation and management approaches, Final Tech. Rep. Proj. R6949, DFID Nat. Resour. Syst. Program. Nottingham: Univ. Nottingham/Univ. Liverpool
19. Agossou C. 2005. Le continuum rural urbain: inter fonctionnalité et gesion desRéseaux sociaux à Cotonou (Benin). See Ref. 76, pp. 233-251
20. Jean Y. 2005. Espace periurbains en France: un tiers espace déchiré entre la ville et la campagne. See Ref. 76, pp. 89-123
21. Evans D, Pottier C, Fletcher R, Hensley S, Tapley I, et al. 2007. A comprehensive archaeological map of the world's largest preindustrial settlement complex at Angkor, Cambodia. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 104(36):14277-14282
22. Dep. Communities Local Gov. 2007. Homes for the future: more affordable, more sustainable.Housing Green Pap. Dep. Communities Local Gov., London. 133 pp.
23. Gallent N, Andersson J, Bianconi M. 2006. Planning on the Edge: The Context for Planning at the Rural-Urban Fringe. London/New York: Routledge. 266 pp.
24. Kunzmann KR. 2001. Welche Zukünfte für Suburbia? Acht Inseln im Archipel der Stadtregion. See Ref. 25, pp. 213-222
25. Brake K, Dangschat JS, Herfert G, ed. 2001. Suburbanisierung in Deutschland-Aktuelle Tendenzen. Opladen: Leske & Budrich. 284 pp.
26. Sieverts T. 2001. Jenseits von Zwischenstadt: de Regionale als Mobile; Ein Beitrag zu einer gestaltenden Regionalplanung. See Ref. 25, pp. 235-246
27. Hahn A. 2001. Lebenswelten am Rand: Interpretationen zum kulturellen Ausdruck vonWohnsuburbanisierung. See Ref. 25, pp. 223-234
28. Irwin EG, Bell KP, Geoghegan J. 2006. Forecasting residential land use change. See Ref. 77, pp. 55-82
29. Templeton J, Hite D, Sohngen B. 2006. Forecasting development at the urban fringe. See Ref. 77, pp. 83-97
30. Lynch L. 2006. Critical mass: Does the number of productive farmland acres or farms affect farmland loss? See Ref. 77, pp. 119-147
31. Geoghegan J, Lynch L, Bucholtz SJ. 2006. Are agricultural land preservation programs self-financing? See Ref. 77, pp. 149-169
32. Batie SS. 2006. A multifunctional approach to northeast agriculture. See Ref. 77, pp. 205-216
33. Nickerson CJ, Hellerstein DM. 2006. Farmland preservation programs and the importance of rural amenities. See Ref. 77, pp. 217-236
34. Johnston RI, Swallow SK. 2006. Introduction: Economics and contemporary land use policy. See Ref. 77, pp. 1-18
35. Adelaja S, Colunga-Garcia M, Gibson MA, Lake MB. 2007. Incorporating market and ecological goals in setting farmland preservation targets. See Ref. 78, pp. 265-269
36. Erling G. 2007. Multifunctional agriculture and the urban-rural interface. See Ref. 78, pp. 275-278
37. Carvalho Rodrigues MIM. 2007. Peri-urban agriculture and Mediterranean ecosystems: the Azeitão cheese production system as an example of sustainable multifunctional agriculture in Lisbon metropolitan area. See Ref. 78, pp. 279-282
38. Mathews LG, Lancaster A, Rex A, O'Leary D, Callahan A. 2007. Practising what we preach: using community-based research methods to facilitate multidirectional and multilayered information exchange along the urban-rural fringe. See Ref. 78, pp. 32-35
39. Hiner C. 2007. Negotiating the rural-urban interface in rural Elk Grove: community advocacy and participation. See Ref. 78, pp. 36-39
40. Polyakov M, Zhang D. 2007. A comparison of econometric approaches to predict land cover dynamics along an urban-rural gradient. See Ref. 78, pp. 150-153
41. Friedmann J. 2005. China's Urban Transition. Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press. 168 pp.
42. Mc Gee TG, Lin CS, Marton A,Wang M,Wu J. 2007. China's Urban Space. Development Under Market Socialism. London/New York: Routledge. 288 pp.
43. Webster D. 2002. On the Edge: Shaping the future of peri-urban East Asia. Asia/Pacific Res. Cent. Discuss. Pap., Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA
44. Webster D, Muller L. 2002. Challenges of peri-urbanization in the lower Yangtze region: the case of Hangzhou-Ninbo corridor. Asia/Pacific Res. Cent. Discuss. Pap., Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA
45. Webster D, Cai J, Muller L, Luo B. 2003. Emerging third stage peri-urbanization: functional specialization in the Hangzhou peri-urban region. Asia/Pacific Res. Cent. Discuss. Pap., Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA
46. Hudalah D,Winarso H,Woltjer J. 2007. Peri-urbanisation in East Asia. Int. Dev. Plan. Rev. 29(4):503-519
47. Wang Y. 2004. Environmental degradation and environmental threats in China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 90:161-169
48. Liu M, Tian H, Zhang C, Chen G, Ren W, et al. 2007. Effects of urbanization and land-use change on water yield-a case study of Haihe Basin in China. See Ref. 78, pp. 94-100
49. Intergov. Panel Clim. Change. 2007. Climate Change 2007. http://www.ipcc.ch/
50. Yankson PWK, Gough KV. 1999. The environmental impact of rapid urbanization in the peri-urban area of Accra, Ghana. Danish J. Geogr. 99:89-100
51. Allen A. 2006. Understanding environmental change in the context of rural-urban interactions. unitybased waste management strategies: peri-urban interface, Kumasi, Ghana. See Ref. 75, pp. 30-43
52. Douglas I. 2006. Peri-urban ecosystems and societies: transitional zones and contrasting values. See Ref. 75, pp. 18-29
53. Rees WE. 1992. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ. Urban. 4(2):121-130
54. Vij M. 2005. Changing rural land values at the urban fringe of Bhopal. See Ref. 79, pp. 231-243
55. Losada H, Martínez H, Vieyra J, Pealing R, Zavala R, et al. 1998. Urban agriculture in the metropolitan zone of Mexico City: changes over time in urban, suburban and peri-urban areas. Environ. Urban. 10(2):37-54
56. Little PD. 1999. Confronting change: contract farming and production relations in peri-urban areas of sub-Saharan Africa. BASIS-CRSP Res. Pap., Inst. Dev. Anthropol., Binghamton, NY
57. Singh RPB, Sen C. 2001. The structure of peri-urban agricultural environment in Varanasi Development Region. Nat. Geogr. J. India 47:63-74
58. Fall ST, Fall AS, Cissé I, Badiane A, Fall CA, Diao MB. 2005. Intégration horticulture-élevage dans les systèmes agricoles urbains de la zone des Niayes (Sénégal). See Ref. 76, pp. 445-478
59. Mazumdar M. 2005. Role of urban and peri-urban agriculture in metropolitan city management. See Ref. 79, pp. 150-196
60. Harris F, Pasquini M, Dung J, Adepetu A. 2006. The environmental and social impacts of peri-urban irrigated vegetable production around Jos, Nigeria. See Ref. 75, pp. 57-73
61. Lynch K, Poole N. 2006. Horticulture and market information at the peri-urban interface: agricultural marketing in Tanzania. See Ref. 75, pp. 74-93
62. Brook RM, Bhat P, Nitturkar A. 2006. Livelihoods from dairying enterprises for the landless in the peri-urban interface around Hubli-Dharwad, India. See Ref. 75, pp. 94-103
63. Niang S, Balde D, ed. 2006. Providing the city with fresh vegetables from urban and peri-urban spaces. Social and economic benefits and constraints, impacts on public health: the case of Patte d'Oie (Commune of Dakar, Senegal). Dakar/Ottawa: Minist. Health Med. Prev., Dep. Public Health, Int. Dev. Res. Cent.
64. Mycoo M. 2006. Sustainable livelihoods in the peri-urban interface: Anse La Raye, St Lucia. See Ref. 75, pp. 134-148
65. Stevens L, Berger R, Kinyanjui MK. 2006. Promoting the interests of the poor in the peri-urban interface: the experience of the Intermediate Technology Development Group in Kenya. See Ref. 75, pp. 266-286
66. Balla MK, Awasthi KD, Pradhan BM. 2007. Analysis of land-use changes and associated socioeconomic factors in Galaundu-Pokhare Khola watershed in Mid-Hills region of Nepal. See Ref. 78, pp. 105-109
67. Akintayo OI, Lawal BO. 2007. Livelihoods in the peri-urban interface of Ibadan: opportunities for sustainable development. See Ref. 78, pp. 110-113
68. Adam-Bradford A, McGregor D, Simon D. 2006. Community-based waste management strategies: periurban interface, Kumasi, Ghana. See Ref. 75, pp. 231-245
69. Mukherjee M. 2006.Waste-fed fisheries in peri-urban Kolkota. See Ref. 75, pp. 104-115
70. Aberra E. 2006. Alternative strategies in alternative spaces: livelihoods of pastoralists in the peri-urban interface of Yabello, southern Ethiopia. See Ref. 75, pp. 116-133
71. Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, De Haan C. 2006. Livestock's Long Shadow. Rome: FAO. 416 pp.
72. Allen A, D́avila JD, Hofmann P. 2006. The peri-urban water poor: citizens or consumers? Environ. Urban. 18(2):333-352
73. Binns T, Maconachie R. 2006. Re-evaluating people-environment relationships at the rural-urban interface: How sustainable is the peri-urban zone in Kano, northern Nigeria? See Ref. 75, pp. 211-228
74. Thompson D, McGregor D, Kotei N, Poku O. 2001. Water quality in peri-urban Kumasi: preliminary results and their significance. CEDAR/IRNR Kumasi Pap. 3. CEDAR, Dep. Geogr., Royal Holloway, Univ. London; Inst. Renew. Nat. Resour., Kwame Nkrumah Univ. Technol., Egham, Surrey/Kumasi http://www.gg.rhul. ac.uk/kumasi/Project0-Related-Papers/Cedar-IRNR/Paper-3/paper-3.html
75. United Nations. 2004. World Urbanization Prospects: the 2003 Revision. New York: UN Dep. Econ. Soc. Aff./Popul. Div.
76. McGregor D, Simon D, Thompson D, eds. 2006. The Peri-Urban Interface: Approaches to Sustainable Natural and Human Resource Use. London/Stirling, VA: Earthscan. 336 pp.
77. Fall AS, Guèye C, eds. 2005. Urbain-Rural: L'Hybridation en Marche. Dakar: Enda Tiers Monde. 478 pp.
78. Johnston RI, Swallow SK, eds. 2006. Economics and Contemporary Land Use Policy: Development and Conservation at the Rural-Urban Fringe.Washington, DC: Resour. Future. 309 pp.
79. Laband DN, ed. 2007. Proceedings, Emerging Issues Along Urban-Rural Interfaces II: Linking Land-Use Science and Society. Atlanta, GA: Auburn Univ. Cent. For. Sustain. 320 pp. http://www.sfws.auburn.edu/urbanruralinterfaces
80. Thakur B, Sinha VNP, Prasad M, Sharma N, Pratap R, et al., eds. 2005. Urban and Regional Development in India, Vol.1. New Delhi: Concept. 872 pp.