Effects of presenteeism in chronic occupational musculoskeletal disorders: Stay at work is validated

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 51, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 724-731

  Howard, Krista J ^a   Mayer, Tom G ^b,d   Gatchel, Robert J ^c  

^a PRIDE Research Foundation   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSENTEEISM; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISABLING MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDER; CHRONIC PAIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DEPRESSION; DISABILITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRESENTEEISM; PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; REHABILITATION; SOCIOECONOMICS; WORK;

EID: 68049140939     PISSN: 10762752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181a297b5     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Hemp P. Presenteeism: at work - but out of it. Harv Bus Rev. 2004:49-58.
2. Loeppke R, Taitel M, Richling D, et al. Health and productivity as a business strategy. J Occup Environ Med. 2007;49:712-721.
3. Brouwer WBF, van Exel NJA, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FFH. Productivity costs before and after absence from work: as important as common? Health Policy. 2002;61:173-187.
4. Prasad M, Wahlquist P, Shikiar R, Shih YT. A review of self-report instruments measuring health-related work productivity. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22:226-243.
5. Lofland JH, Pizzi L, Frick KD. A review of health-related workplace productivity loss instruments. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22:165-184.
6. Kessler RC, Ames M, Hymel P, et al. Using the World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ) to evaluate the indirect workplace costs of illness. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46:S23-S37.
7. Mattke S, Balakrishnan BS, Bergamo BS, Newberry SJ. A review of methods to measure health-related productivity loss. Am J Manag Care. 2007;13:211-217.
8. Stay-at-Work and Return-to-Work Process Improvement Committee. Preventing needless work disability by helping people stay employed. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48:972-987.
9. Wyman DO. Evaluating patients for return to work. Am Fam Physician. 1999;59:844-848.
10. Christian J. Most days "off work on comp" may be unnecessary. OEM Rep. 1998;12:65-70.
11. Hashemi L, Webster B, Clancy E, Volinn E. Length of disability and cost of workers' compensation low back pain claims. J Occup Rehabil. 1997;39:937-945.
12. Harris I, Multford J, Solomon M. Association between compensation status and outcome after surgery. J Am Med Assoc. 2005;293:1644-1652.
13. Howard KH, Mayer TG, Theodore BR, Gatchel RJ. Chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorder patients failing to complete functional restoration: a psychosocial risk factor analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. In press.
14. Krause N, Frank JW, Dasinger LK, Sullivan T, Sinclair SJ. Determinants of duration of disability and return to work after work-related injury and illness: challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40:464-484.
15. Jordan KD, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ. Should extended disability be an exclusion criterion for tertiary rehabilitation? Socioeconomic outcomes of early versus late functional restoration in compensation spinal disorders. Spine. 1998;23:2110-2116; discussion 2117.
16. Dersh J, Gatchel RJ, Mayer T, Polatin P, Temple O. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in patients with chronic disabling occupational spinal disorders. Spine. 2006;31:1156-1182.
17. Gatchel RJ. Comorbidity of chronic mental and physical health disorders: the biopsychosocial perspective. Am Psychol. 2004;59:792-805.
18. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Kishino N, et al. Objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury: a prospective study with comparison group and one-year follow-up. Spine. 1985;10:482-493.
19. Mayer TG. Quantitative physical and functional capacity assessment. In: Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, eds. Occupational Musculoskeletal Disorders: Function, Outcomes & Evidence. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2000.
20. Glenn BA. Process and outcome of multidisciplinary pain treatment: an evaluation of a stage of change model. Dissertation Abstracts International: B: Sci Eng. 2002;62:5373.
21. Gatchel RJ, Okifuji A. Evidence-based scientific data documenting the treatment- and cost-effectiveness of comprehensive pain programs for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain. 2006;7:779-793.
22. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ. Functional Restoration for Spinal Disorders: The Sports Medicine Approach. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1988.
23. Mayer TG, Polatin PB. Tertiary nonoperative interdisciplinary programs: the functional restoration variant of the outpatient chronic pain management program. In: Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, eds. Occupational Musculoskeletal Disorders: Function, Outcomes & Evidence. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2000:639-649.
24. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Mayer H, Kishino ND, Keeley J, Mooney VA. A prospective two year study of functional restoration in industrial low back injury utilizing objective assessment. JAMA. 1987;258:1763-1767.
25. Million S, Hall W, Haavik NK, Baker RD, Jayson MIV. Assessment of the progress of the back-pain patient. 1981 Volvo Award in Clinical Science. Spine. 1982;7:204-212.
26. Becker N, Hojsted J, Sjogren P, Eriksen J. Sociodemographic predictors of treatment outcome in chronic non-malignant pain patients. Do patients receiving or applying for disability pension benefit from multidisciplinary pain treatment? Pain. 1998;77:279-287.
27. Butcher JN, Dahlstrom WG, Graham JR, Tellegen AM, Kaemmer B. MMPI-2: Manual for the Administration and Scoring. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 1989.
28. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders-Nonpatient Edition. (SCID-I/NP, Version 2.0). New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute; 1995.