The national bowel cancer project: Social deprivation is an independent predictor of nonrestorative rectal cancer surgery

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1046-1053

  Tilney, Henry ^a   Lovegrove, Richard E ^a   Smith, Jason J ^b   Thompson, Michael R ^c   Tekkis, Paris P ^a  

^a ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b WEST MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Abdominoperineal resection; Outcomes; Rectal cancer; Social deprivation

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RECTUM ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; RECTUM ANTERIOR RESECTION; RECTUM CANCER; RECTUM SURGERY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL ISOLATION; UNITED KINGDOM; ADJUVANT THERAPY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RECTUM TUMOR; RISK FACTOR; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RISK FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 68049137352     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: 15300358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a65f41     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Hole DJ, McArdle CS. Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on outcome after surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2002;89:586-590 (Pubitemid 34415608)
2. Smith JJ, Tilney HS, Heriot AG, et al. Social deprivation and outcomes in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2006;93:1123-1131 (Pubitemid 44343510)
3. Tilney HS, Heriot AG, Purkayastha S, et al. A national perspective on the decline of abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203:S70-1.
4. NICE. Improving outcomes in colorectal cancers: manual update. 2004. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=CSGCCfullguideline. Accessed January 6, 2007.
5. Radcliffe A. Can the results of anorectal (abdominoperineal) resection be improved: are circumferential resection margins too often positive? Colorectal Dis 2006;8:160-167
6. Tytherleigh MG, Mortensen NJ. Options for sphincter preservation in surgery for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2003;90:922-933 (Pubitemid 37026319)
7. Minsky BD. Sphincter preservation in rectal cancer. Preoperative radiation therapy followed by low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis. Semin Radiat Oncol 1998;8:30-35
8. Heald RJ, Smedh RK, Kald A, et al. Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: an endangered operation. Norman Nigro Lectureship. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:747-751 (Pubitemid 27295041)
9. Heald RJ. Total mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer: a Scandinavian consensus. Br J Surg 1995;82:1297-1299
10. Rullier E, Laurent C, Bretagnol F, et al. Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule. Ann Surg 2005;241:465-469 (Pubitemid 40299723)
11. Tilney HS, Tekkis PP. Extending the horizons of restorative rectal surgery: intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2008;10:3-15.
12. Tekkis PP, Poloniecki JD, Thompson MR, et al. Operative mortality in colorectal cancer: prospective national study. BMJ 2003;327:1196-1201
13. The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland Database and Dataset. Version 2 for Access 2000, Clin IT 2000. Available at: http://www.ic.nhs.uk/webfiles/Services/NCASP/Cancer/ New%20web%20documents%20(Bowel)/National%20Bowel%20Cancer%20Audit%20Datasetv2.1. doc. Accessed January 10, 2007.
14. Office of Population, Census and Surveys (OPCS-4). Tabular list of the Classification of Surgical Operations and Procedures. 4th revision. London: HMSO, 1990.
15. Turnbull RB Jr, Kyle K, Watson FR, et al. Cancer of the colon: the influence of the no-touch isolation technic on survival rates. Ann Surg 1967;166:420-427
16. Dripps RD, Lamont A, Eckenhoff JE. The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. JAMA 1961;178:261-266
17. Indices of Deprivation 2004 - Summary. Available at: http://www. communities.gov.uk/index.asp?id=1128440. Accessed January 8, 2007.
18. Strong M, Maheswaran R, Pearson T. A comparison of methods for calculating general practice level socioeconomic deprivation. Int J Health Geogr 2006;5:29. (Pubitemid 44151460)
19. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health. Perinatal Mortality Surveillance 2004: England, Wales and Northern Ireland. London: CEMACH; 2006. Available at: http://www.cemach.org.uk/Publications/CEMACH-Publications/ Maternaland-Perinatal-Health.aspx. Accessed January 8, 2007.
20. Glynne-Jones R, Mawdsley S, Pearce T, et al. Alternative clinical end points in rectal cancer: are we getting closer? Ann Oncol 2006;17:1239-1248
21. Sprangers MA, Taal BG, Aaronson NK, et al. Quality of life in colorectal cancer. Stoma vs. nonstoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:361-369
22. Williams NS, Johnston D. The quality of life after rectal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1983;70:460-462
23. Bullard KM, Trudel JL, Baxter NN, et al. Primary perineal wound closure after preoperative radiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection has a high incidence of wound failure. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:438-443
24. Christian CK, Kwaan MR, Betensky RA, et al. Risk factors for perineal wound complications following abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:43-48
25. Pachler J, Wille-Jorgensen P. Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005:CD004323.
26. Cornish JA, Tilney HS, Heriot AG, et al. A meta-analysis of quality of life for abdominoperineal excision of rectum versus anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:2056-2068
27. Moriya Y. Function preservation in rectal cancer surgery. Int J Clin Oncol 2006;11:339-343 (Pubitemid 44627654)
28. Park JG, Lee MR, Lim SB, et al. Colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis after ultralow anterior resection with upper sphincter excision for low-lying rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:2570-2573
29. Okaro AC, Worthington T, Stebbing JF, et al. Curative resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma: abdomino-perineal vs. anterior resection. Colorectal Dis 2006;8:645-649 (Pubitemid 44363586)
30. Law WL, Chu KW. Abdominoperineal resection is associated with poor oncological outcome. Br J Surg 2004;91:1493-1499 (Pubitemid 39518088)
31. Chiappa A, Biffi R, Zbar AP, et al. Results of treatment of distal rectal carcinoma since the introduction of total mesorectal excision: a single unit experience, 1994-2003. Int J Colorectal Dis 2005;20:221-230
32. Birbeck KF, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, et al. Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2002;235:449-457
33. Tekkis PP, Heriot AG, Smith J, et al. Comparison of circumferential margin involvement between restorative and nonrestorative resections for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2005;7:369-374 (Pubitemid 40894866)
34. Tilney HS, Tekkis PP, Sains PS, et al. Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:29-36.
35. van Krieken JH, Nagtegaal ID. Pathological quality assurance in gastro-intestinal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005;31:675-680
36. Tekkis PP, Smith JJ, Heriot AG, et al. A national study on lymph node retrieval in resectional surgery for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:1673-1683
37. Wijesuriya RE, Deen KI, Hewavisenthi J, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer down-stages the tumor but reduces lymph node harvest significantly. Surg Today 2005;35:442-445 (Pubitemid 40873805)