-
1
-
-
84864759995
-
-
Available at: Accessed December 17, 2007
-
Merriam-Webster's online dictionary. Available at: http://www.m-w.com/ dictionary. Accessed December 17, 2007
-
Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary
-
-
-
2
-
-
0004234233
-
-
Available at: Accessed January 21, 2008
-
MeSH (medical subject headings). Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/sites/entrez. Accessed January 21, 2008
-
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings)
-
-
-
3
-
-
18644381000
-
Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences
-
Patsopoulos NA, Analatos AA, Ioannidis JP: Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. JAMA 2005;293:2362-2366
-
(2005)
JAMA
, vol.293
, pp. 2362-2366
-
-
Patsopoulos, N.A.1
Analatos, A.A.2
Ioannidis, J.P.3
-
4
-
-
32344447749
-
Assessing prevention research impact: A bibliometric analysis
-
DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.10.025, PII S0749379705004496
-
Franks AL, Simoes EJ, Singh R, et al: Assessing prevention research impact: A bibliometric analysis. Am J Prev Med 2006;30:211-216 (Pubitemid 43221955)
-
(2006)
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
, vol.30
, Issue.3
, pp. 211-216
-
-
Franks, A.L.1
Simoes, E.J.2
Singh, R.3
Gray, B.S.4
-
5
-
-
33644895455
-
A web-based systematic review on traumatic spinal cord injury comparing the "citation classics" with the consumers' perspectives
-
Furlan JC, Fehlings MG: A web-based systematic review on traumatic spinal cord injury comparing the "citation classics" with the consumers' perspectives. J Neurotrauma 2006;23:156-169
-
(2006)
J Neurotrauma
, vol.23
, pp. 156-169
-
-
Furlan, J.C.1
Fehlings, M.G.2
-
6
-
-
36249031607
-
The impact of review articles
-
Ketcham CM, Crawford JM: The impact of review articles. Lab Invest 2007;87:1174-1185
-
(2007)
Lab Invest
, vol.87
, pp. 1174-1185
-
-
Ketcham, C.M.1
Crawford, J.M.2
-
7
-
-
11144231724
-
Structure of the 2003 impact factor for Croatian medical journal
-
Kovacic N: Structure of the 2003 impact factor for Croatian medical journal. Croat Med J 2004;45:671-673
-
(2004)
Croat Med J
, vol.45
, pp. 671-673
-
-
Kovacic, N.1
-
8
-
-
2442480415
-
Doubling the Impact: Publication of Systematic Review Articles in Orthopaedic Journals
-
Bhandari M, Montori VM, Devereaux PJ, et al: Doubling the impact: Publication of systematic review articles in orthopaedic journals. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A:1012-1016 (Pubitemid 38619803)
-
(2004)
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series a
, vol.86
, Issue.5
, pp. 1012-1016
-
-
Bhandari, M.1
Montori, V.M.2
Devereaux, P.J.3
Wilczynski, N.L.4
Morgan, D.5
Haynes, R.B.6
-
9
-
-
3142567881
-
Systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study of location and citation counts
-
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-1-2
-
Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, et al: Systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study of location and citation counts. BMC Med 2003;1:2 (Pubitemid 39111849)
-
(2003)
BMC Medicine
, vol.1
, pp. 2
-
-
Montori, V.M.1
Wilczynski, N.L.2
Morgan, D.3
Haynes, B.4
Eady, A.5
Marks, S.6
McKibbon, A.7
Walker-Dilks, C.8
Walter, S.9
Wong, S.10
-
10
-
-
35348957823
-
Most frequently cited and downloaded papers from volume98 (2005)
-
Coats AJ: Most frequently cited and downloaded papers from volume98 (2005). Int J Cardiol 2007;122: e16-e17
-
(2007)
Int J Cardiol
, vol.122
-
-
Coats, A.J.1
-
11
-
-
27244452574
-
Top of the charts: Download versus citations in the International Journal of Cardiology
-
Coats AJ: Top of the charts: Download versus citations in the International Journal of Cardiology. Int J Cardiol 2005;105:123-125
-
(2005)
Int J Cardiol
, vol.105
, pp. 123-125
-
-
Coats, A.J.1
-
12
-
-
20244375941
-
Does anybody read "evidencebased" articles?
-
Loke YK, Derry S: Does anybody read "evidencebased" articles? BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:14
-
(2003)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.3
, pp. 14
-
-
Loke, Y.K.1
Derry, S.2
-
13
-
-
5344264991
-
More reprint requests, more citations?
-
Drenth JPH: More reprint requests, more citations? Scientometrics 2003;56:283-286
-
(2003)
Scientometrics
, vol.56
, pp. 283-286
-
-
Drenth, J.P.H.1
-
14
-
-
0030027092
-
Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't
-
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al: Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996;312:71-72
-
(1996)
BMJ
, vol.312
, pp. 71-72
-
-
Sackett, D.L.1
Rosenberg, W.M.2
Gray, J.A.3
-
15
-
-
33745712037
-
The process of systematic review and its application in agri-food public-health
-
Sargeant JM, Rajic A, Read S, et al: The process of systematic review and its application in agri-food public-health. Prev Vet Med 2006;75:141-151
-
(2006)
Prev Vet Med
, vol.75
, pp. 141-151
-
-
Sargeant, J.M.1
Rajic, A.2
Read, S.3
-
16
-
-
0036710802
-
Expert reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses
-
Macbeth F, Overgaard J: Expert reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Radiother Oncol 2002; 64:233-234
-
(2002)
Radiother Oncol
, vol.64
, pp. 233-234
-
-
Macbeth, F.1
Overgaard, J.2
-
18
-
-
22144443852
-
Clinician's guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses
-
Feldstein DA: Clinician's guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses. WMJ 2005;104:25-29 (Pubitemid 41583628)
-
(2005)
Wisconsin Medical Journal
, vol.104
, Issue.3
, pp. 25-29
-
-
Feldstein, D.A.1
-
20
-
-
34047164420
-
How can we synthesize qualitative and quantitative evidence for healthcare policy-makers and managers?
-
Pope C, Mays N, Popay J: How can we synthesize qualitative and quantitative evidence for healthcare policy-makers and managers? Healthc Manage Forum 2006;19:27-31
-
(2006)
Healthc Manage Forum
, vol.19
, pp. 27-31
-
-
Pope, C.1
Mays, N.2
Popay, J.3
-
21
-
-
34147213591
-
Synthesising quantitative and qualitative research in evidence- based patient information
-
Goldsmith MR, Bankhead CR, Austoker J: Synthesising quantitative and qualitative research in evidence- based patient information. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;61:262-270
-
(2007)
J Epidemiol Community Health
, vol.61
, pp. 262-270
-
-
Goldsmith, M.R.1
Bankhead, C.R.2
Austoker, J.3
-
22
-
-
17844394151
-
Science and art in reviewing literature
-
Griffiths P, Norman I: Science and art in reviewing literature. Int J Nurs Stud 2005;42:373-376
-
(2005)
Int J Nurs Stud
, vol.42
, pp. 373-376
-
-
Griffiths, P.1
Norman, I.2
-
23
-
-
0031447839
-
Do authors of review articles use systematic methods to identify, assess and synthesize information?
-
Bramwell VH, Williams CJ: Do authors of review articles use systematic methods to identify, assess and synthesize information? Ann Oncol 1997;8: 1185-1195
-
(1997)
Ann Oncol
, vol.8
, pp. 1185-1195
-
-
Bramwell, V.H.1
Williams, C.J.2
-
25
-
-
33644931936
-
Bias in clinical intervention research
-
Gluud LL: Bias in clinical intervention research. Am J Epidemiol 2006;163:493-501
-
(2006)
Am J Epidemiol
, vol.163
, pp. 493-501
-
-
Gluud, L.L.1
-
26
-
-
3042839311
-
A comparison of yield in a non-systematic and a systematic review
-
Downer MC, Moles DR, Speight PM: A comparison of yield in a non-systematic and a systematic review. Community Dent Health 2004;21:138-142
-
(2004)
Community Dent Health
, vol.21
, pp. 138-142
-
-
Downer, M.C.1
Moles, D.R.2
Speight, P.M.3
-
27
-
-
33751018871
-
Evidence-based medicine: Fifteen years later. Golem the good, the bad, and the ugly in need of a review?
-
Jenicek M. Evidence-based medicine: Fifteen years later. Golem the good, the bad, and the ugly in need of a review? Med Sci Monit 2006;12:RA241-51 (Pubitemid 44739914)
-
(2006)
Medical Science Monitor
, vol.12
, Issue.11
-
-
Jenicek, M.1
-
29
-
-
0031822234
-
The management of established postherpetic neuralgia: A comparison of the quality and content of traditional vs. systematic reviews
-
DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02315.x
-
Ladhani S, Williams HC: The management of established postherpetic neuralgia: A comparison of the quality and content of traditional vs. systematic reviews. Br J Dermatol 1998;139:66-72 (Pubitemid 28338065)
-
(1998)
British Journal of Dermatology
, vol.139
, Issue.1
, pp. 66-72
-
-
Ladhani, S.1
Williams, H.C.2
-
30
-
-
16844386011
-
Of mites and men: Reference bias in narrative review articles: a systematic review
-
Schmidt LM, Gotzsche PC: Of mites and men: Reference bias in narrative review articles: A systematic review. J Fam Pract 2005;54:334-338
-
(2005)
J Fam Pract
, vol.54
, pp. 334-338
-
-
Schmidt, L.M.1
Gotzsche, P.C.2
-
31
-
-
3042756772
-
The use of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in infection control and hospital epidemiology
-
DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2003.10.004, PII S0196655303008149
-
Bent S, Shojania KG, Saint S: The use of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in infection control and hospital epidemiology. Am J Infect Control 2004;32: 246-254 (Pubitemid 38857902)
-
(2004)
American Journal of Infection Control
, vol.32
, Issue.4
, pp. 246-254
-
-
Bent, S.1
Shojania, K.G.2
Saint, S.3
-
32
-
-
0026652402
-
A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction
-
Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, et al: A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA 1992;268:240-248
-
(1992)
JAMA
, vol.268
, pp. 240-248
-
-
Antman, E.M.1
Lau, J.2
Kupelnick, B.3
-
33
-
-
0031047837
-
Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions
-
Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB: Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:376-380
-
(1997)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.126
, pp. 376-380
-
-
Cook, D.J.1
Mulrow, C.D.2
Haynes, R.B.3
-
34
-
-
0028120335
-
Checklists for review articles
-
Oxman AD: Checklists for review articles. BMJ 1994; 309:648-651
-
(1994)
BMJ
, vol.309
, pp. 648-651
-
-
Oxman, A.D.1
-
35
-
-
0035240462
-
Evidence syntheses in child health
-
Moyer VA: Evidence syntheses in child health. Ambul Pediatr 2001;1:53-58
-
(2001)
Ambul Pediatr
, vol.1
, pp. 53-58
-
-
Moyer, V.A.1
-
36
-
-
0033583746
-
Users' guides to the medical literature: XVI. How to use a treatment recommendation. Evidence-based medicine working group and the Cochrane applicability methods working group
-
Guyatt GH, Sinclair J, Cook DJ, et al: Users' guides to the medical literature: XVI. How to use a treatment recommendation. Evidence-based medicine working group and the Cochrane applicability methods working group. JAMA 1999;281:1836-1843
-
(1999)
JAMA
, vol.281
, pp. 1836-1843
-
-
Guyatt, G.H.1
Sinclair, J.2
Cook, D.J.3
-
37
-
-
0024403234
-
Quotation accuracy in review articles
-
Neihouse PF, Priske SC: Quotation accuracy in review articles. DICP 1989;23:594-596
-
(1989)
DICP
, vol.23
, pp. 594-596
-
-
Neihouse, P.F.1
Priske, S.C.2
-
38
-
-
33745051367
-
Improving compliance in depression: A systematic review of narrative reviews
-
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2006.00733.x
-
Bollini P, Pampallona S, Kupelnick B, et al: Improving compliance in depression: A systematic review of narrative reviews. J Clin Pharm Ther 2006;31:253-260 (Pubitemid 43873548)
-
(2006)
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
, vol.31
, Issue.3
, pp. 253-260
-
-
Bollini, P.1
Pampallona, S.2
Kupelnick, B.3
Tibaldi, G.4
Munizza, C.5
-
39
-
-
0023315354
-
The medical review article: State of the science
-
Mulrow CD: The medical review article: State of the science. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:485-488
-
(1987)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.106
, pp. 485-488
-
-
Mulrow, C.D.1
-
40
-
-
0033593076
-
The medical review article revisited: Has the science improved?
-
McAlister FA, Clark HD, van Walraven C, et al: The medical review article revisited: Has the science improved? Ann Intern Med 1999;131:947-951
-
(1999)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.131
, pp. 947-951
-
-
McAlister, F.A.1
Clark, H.D.2
Van Walraven, C.3
-
41
-
-
36248934073
-
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 [Updated September 2006]
-
Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Chichester, UK, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2006
-
Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 [Updated September 2006]. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2006. Chichester, UK, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2006
-
(2006)
The Cochrane Library
, Issue.4
-
-
-
42
-
-
33646066147
-
-
St. Paul, MN, American Academy of Neurology
-
Edlund W, Gronseth G, So Y, et al: Clinical Practice Guidelines Process Manual, 2004 ed. St. Paul, MN, American Academy of Neurology, 2004
-
(2004)
Clinical Practice Guidelines Process Manual, 2004 Ed.
-
-
Edlund, W.1
Gronseth, G.2
So, Y.3
-
43
-
-
0033610734
-
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses
-
Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al: Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet 1999;354:1896-1900
-
(1999)
Lancet
, vol.354
, pp. 1896-1900
-
-
Moher, D.1
Cook, D.J.2
Eastwood, S.3
-
44
-
-
33947701090
-
Many reviews are systematic but some are more transparent and completely reported than others
-
PLoS Medicine Editors
-
PLoS Medicine Editors: Many reviews are systematic but some are more transparent and completely reported than others. PLoS Med 2007;4:e147
-
(2007)
PLoS Med
, vol.4
-
-
-
45
-
-
0034716596
-
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: Critical evaluation
-
Jadad AR, Moher M, Browman GP, et al: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: Critical evaluation. BMJ 2000;320:537-540 (Pubitemid 30175797)
-
(2000)
British Medical Journal
, vol.320
, Issue.7234
, pp. 537-540
-
-
Jadad, A.R.1
Moher, M.2
Browman, G.P.3
Booker, L.4
Sigouin, C.5
Fuentes, M.6
Stevens, R.7
-
46
-
-
0026655939
-
Bias in meta-analytic research
-
Felson DT: Bias in meta-analytic research. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:885-892
-
(1992)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.45
, pp. 885-892
-
-
Felson, D.T.1
-
47
-
-
33846423538
-
The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: An independent appraisal
-
DOI 10.1097/01.CCM.0000253394.15628.FD, PII 0000324620070200000036
-
Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Ferland A, et al: The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane database of systematic reviews: An independent appraisal. Crit Care Med 2007;35:589-594 (Pubitemid 46148553)
-
(2007)
Critical Care Medicine
, vol.35
, Issue.2
, pp. 589-594
-
-
Delaney, A.1
Bagshaw, S.M.2
Ferland, A.3
Laupland, K.4
Manns, B.5
Doig, C.6
-
51
-
-
34548415359
-
Systematic reviews: Time to address clinical and policy relevance as well as methodological rigor
-
Laupacis A, Straus S: Systematic reviews: Time to address clinical and policy relevance as well as methodological rigor. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:273-274 (Pubitemid 351664584)
-
(2007)
Annals of Internal Medicine
, vol.147
, Issue.4
, pp. 273-274
-
-
Laupacis, A.1
Straus, S.2
-
52
-
-
2342563376
-
Reporting of adverse drug reactions in randomised controlled trials-A systematic survey
-
Loke YK, Derry S: Reporting of adverse drug reactions in randomised controlled trials-A systematic survey. BMC Clin Pharmacol 2001;1:3
-
(2001)
BMC Clin Pharmacol
, vol.1
, pp. 3
-
-
Loke, Y.K.1
Derry, S.2
-
53
-
-
0035941525
-
Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: An evaluation of 7 medical areas
-
Ioannidis JP, Lau J: Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: An evaluation of 7 medical areas. JAMA 2001;285:437-443
-
(2001)
JAMA
, vol.285
, pp. 437-443
-
-
Ioannidis, J.P.1
Lau, J.2
-
54
-
-
4444321215
-
Safety reporting in randomized trials of mental health interventions
-
DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.9.1692
-
Papanikolaou PN, Churchill R, Wahlbeck K, et al: Safety reporting in randomized trials of mental health interventions. Am J Psychiatry 2004;161:1692-1697 (Pubitemid 39201468)
-
(2004)
American Journal of Psychiatry
, vol.161
, Issue.9
, pp. 1692-1697
-
-
Papanikolaou, P.N.1
Churchill, R.2
Wahlbeck, K.3
Ioannidis, J.P.A.4
-
55
-
-
27744468588
-
Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: The ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force report
-
DOI 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00045.x
-
Ramsey S, Willke R, Briggs A, et al: Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: The ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force report. Value Health 2005;8:521-523 (Pubitemid 41727304)
-
(2005)
Value in Health
, vol.8
, Issue.5
, pp. 521-533
-
-
Ramsey, S.1
Willke, R.2
Briggs, A.3
Brown, R.4
Buxton, M.5
Chawla, A.6
Cook, J.7
Glick, H.8
Liljas, B.9
Petitti, D.10
Reed, S.11
-
56
-
-
33748336479
-
Analyses of cost data in economic evaluations conducted alongside randomized controlled trials
-
Doshi JA, Glick HA, Polsky D: Analyses of cost data in economic evaluations conducted alongside randomized controlled trials. Value Health 2006;9:334-340
-
(2006)
Value Health
, vol.9
, pp. 334-340
-
-
Doshi, J.A.1
Glick, H.A.2
Polsky, D.3
-
57
-
-
0032585183
-
Analysis and interpretation of cost data in randomised controlled trials: Review of published studies
-
Barber JA, Thompson SG: Analysis and interpretation of cost data in randomised controlled trials: Review of published studies. BMJ 1998;317:1195-1200
-
(1998)
BMJ
, vol.317
, pp. 1195-1200
-
-
Barber, J.A.1
Thompson, S.G.2
-
58
-
-
34548442822
-
How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? a survival analysis
-
Shojania KG, Sampson M, Ansari MT, et al: How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:224-233 (Pubitemid 351664578)
-
(2007)
Annals of Internal Medicine
, vol.147
, Issue.4
, pp. 224-233
-
-
Shojania, K.G.1
Sampson, M.2
Ansari, M.T.3
Ji, J.4
Doucette, S.5
Moher, D.6
-
59
-
-
0035196745
-
Reviewing the reviews: How strong is the evidence? How clear are the conclusions?
-
Ezzo J, Bausell B, Moerman DE, et al: Reviewing the reviews. How strong is the evidence? How clear are the conclusions? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2001;17:457-466 (Pubitemid 33108640)
-
(2001)
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
, vol.17
, Issue.4
, pp. 457-466
-
-
Ezzo, J.1
Bausell, B.2
Moerman, D.E.3
Berman, B.4
Hadhazy, V.5
-
60
-
-
44449160412
-
The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: An objective or subjective process?
-
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-8-19
-
Shrier I, Boivin JF, Platt RW, et al: The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: An objective or subjective process? BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008;8:19 (Pubitemid 351792456)
-
(2008)
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
, vol.8
, pp. 19
-
-
Shrier, I.1
Boivin, J.-F.2
Platt, R.W.3
Steele, R.J.4
Brophy, J.M.5
Carnevale, F.6
Eisenberg, M.J.7
Furlan, A.8
Kakuma, R.9
Macdonald, M.E.10
Pilote, L.11
Rossignol, M.12
-
61
-
-
0037240936
-
How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine
-
DOI 10.1258/jrsm.96.1.17
-
Linde K, Willich SN: How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine. J R Soc Med 2003;96:17-22 (Pubitemid 36106273)
-
(2003)
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
, vol.96
, Issue.1
, pp. 17-22
-
-
Linde, K.1
Willich, S.N.2
-
62
-
-
15944422498
-
Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews
-
Collins JA, Fauser BC: Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews. Hum Reprod Update 2005;11:103-104
-
(2005)
Hum Reprod Update
, vol.11
, pp. 103-104
-
-
Collins, J.A.1
Fauser, B.C.2
-
63
-
-
4744363125
-
Should All Literature Reviews be Systematic?
-
Badger D, Nursten J, Williams P, et al: Should all literature reviews be systematic? Eval Res Educ 2000;14:220-230 (Pubitemid 33241974)
-
(2000)
Evaluation & Research in Education
, vol.14
, Issue.3-4
, pp. 220-230
-
-
Badger, D.1
Nursten, J.2
Williams, P.3
Woodward, M.4
-
64
-
-
2542505640
-
Differences between systematic reviews and health technology assessments: A trade-off between the ideals of scientific rigor and the realities of policy making
-
DOI 10.1017/S0266462304000959
-
Rotstein D, Laupacis A: Differences between systematic reviews and health technology assessments: A trade-off between the ideals of scientific rigor and the realities of policy making. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2004;20:177-183 (Pubitemid 38685949)
-
(2004)
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
, vol.20
, Issue.2
, pp. 177-183
-
-
Rotstein, D.1
Laupacis, A.2
-
66
-
-
33846953635
-
Systematic reviews, Cochrane and evidence- based medicine-Why I prize prudent scepticism above indefensible certainty
-
Burton MJ: Systematic reviews, Cochrane and evidence- based medicine-Why I prize prudent scepticism above indefensible certainty. Clin Otolaryngol 2007;32:60-63
-
(2007)
Clin Otolaryngol
, vol.32
, pp. 60-63
-
-
Burton, M.J.1
|