메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 88, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 423-430

The value of "traditional" reviews in the era of systematic reviewing

Author keywords

Rehabilitation; Research; Review (publication type); Review literature as topic

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA SYNTHESIS; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; LITERATURE; NARRATIVE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; REHABILITATION; REVIEW; SCIENCE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ARTICLE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE;

EID: 68049137342     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31819c59c6     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (59)

References (66)
  • 1
    • 84864759995 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Available at: Accessed December 17, 2007
    • Merriam-Webster's online dictionary. Available at: http://www.m-w.com/ dictionary. Accessed December 17, 2007
    • Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary
  • 2
    • 0004234233 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Available at: Accessed January 21, 2008
    • MeSH (medical subject headings). Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/sites/entrez. Accessed January 21, 2008
    • MeSH (Medical Subject Headings)
  • 3
    • 18644381000 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences
    • Patsopoulos NA, Analatos AA, Ioannidis JP: Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. JAMA 2005;293:2362-2366
    • (2005) JAMA , vol.293 , pp. 2362-2366
    • Patsopoulos, N.A.1    Analatos, A.A.2    Ioannidis, J.P.3
  • 5
    • 33644895455 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A web-based systematic review on traumatic spinal cord injury comparing the "citation classics" with the consumers' perspectives
    • Furlan JC, Fehlings MG: A web-based systematic review on traumatic spinal cord injury comparing the "citation classics" with the consumers' perspectives. J Neurotrauma 2006;23:156-169
    • (2006) J Neurotrauma , vol.23 , pp. 156-169
    • Furlan, J.C.1    Fehlings, M.G.2
  • 6
    • 36249031607 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The impact of review articles
    • Ketcham CM, Crawford JM: The impact of review articles. Lab Invest 2007;87:1174-1185
    • (2007) Lab Invest , vol.87 , pp. 1174-1185
    • Ketcham, C.M.1    Crawford, J.M.2
  • 7
    • 11144231724 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Structure of the 2003 impact factor for Croatian medical journal
    • Kovacic N: Structure of the 2003 impact factor for Croatian medical journal. Croat Med J 2004;45:671-673
    • (2004) Croat Med J , vol.45 , pp. 671-673
    • Kovacic, N.1
  • 10
    • 35348957823 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Most frequently cited and downloaded papers from volume98 (2005)
    • Coats AJ: Most frequently cited and downloaded papers from volume98 (2005). Int J Cardiol 2007;122: e16-e17
    • (2007) Int J Cardiol , vol.122
    • Coats, A.J.1
  • 11
    • 27244452574 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Top of the charts: Download versus citations in the International Journal of Cardiology
    • Coats AJ: Top of the charts: Download versus citations in the International Journal of Cardiology. Int J Cardiol 2005;105:123-125
    • (2005) Int J Cardiol , vol.105 , pp. 123-125
    • Coats, A.J.1
  • 12
    • 20244375941 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Does anybody read "evidencebased" articles?
    • Loke YK, Derry S: Does anybody read "evidencebased" articles? BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:14
    • (2003) BMC Med Res Methodol , vol.3 , pp. 14
    • Loke, Y.K.1    Derry, S.2
  • 13
    • 5344264991 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • More reprint requests, more citations?
    • Drenth JPH: More reprint requests, more citations? Scientometrics 2003;56:283-286
    • (2003) Scientometrics , vol.56 , pp. 283-286
    • Drenth, J.P.H.1
  • 14
    • 0030027092 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't
    • Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al: Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996;312:71-72
    • (1996) BMJ , vol.312 , pp. 71-72
    • Sackett, D.L.1    Rosenberg, W.M.2    Gray, J.A.3
  • 15
    • 33745712037 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The process of systematic review and its application in agri-food public-health
    • Sargeant JM, Rajic A, Read S, et al: The process of systematic review and its application in agri-food public-health. Prev Vet Med 2006;75:141-151
    • (2006) Prev Vet Med , vol.75 , pp. 141-151
    • Sargeant, J.M.1    Rajic, A.2    Read, S.3
  • 16
    • 0036710802 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Expert reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    • Macbeth F, Overgaard J: Expert reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Radiother Oncol 2002; 64:233-234
    • (2002) Radiother Oncol , vol.64 , pp. 233-234
    • Macbeth, F.1    Overgaard, J.2
  • 18
    • 22144443852 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Clinician's guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    • Feldstein DA: Clinician's guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses. WMJ 2005;104:25-29 (Pubitemid 41583628)
    • (2005) Wisconsin Medical Journal , vol.104 , Issue.3 , pp. 25-29
    • Feldstein, D.A.1
  • 19
    • 0031204753 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques
    • Sandelowski M, Docherty S, Emden C: Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Res Nurs Health 1997;20:365-371
    • (1997) Res Nurs Health , vol.20 , pp. 365-371
    • Sandelowski, M.1    Docherty, S.2    Emden, C.3
  • 20
    • 34047164420 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How can we synthesize qualitative and quantitative evidence for healthcare policy-makers and managers?
    • Pope C, Mays N, Popay J: How can we synthesize qualitative and quantitative evidence for healthcare policy-makers and managers? Healthc Manage Forum 2006;19:27-31
    • (2006) Healthc Manage Forum , vol.19 , pp. 27-31
    • Pope, C.1    Mays, N.2    Popay, J.3
  • 21
    • 34147213591 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Synthesising quantitative and qualitative research in evidence- based patient information
    • Goldsmith MR, Bankhead CR, Austoker J: Synthesising quantitative and qualitative research in evidence- based patient information. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;61:262-270
    • (2007) J Epidemiol Community Health , vol.61 , pp. 262-270
    • Goldsmith, M.R.1    Bankhead, C.R.2    Austoker, J.3
  • 22
    • 17844394151 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Science and art in reviewing literature
    • Griffiths P, Norman I: Science and art in reviewing literature. Int J Nurs Stud 2005;42:373-376
    • (2005) Int J Nurs Stud , vol.42 , pp. 373-376
    • Griffiths, P.1    Norman, I.2
  • 23
    • 0031447839 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Do authors of review articles use systematic methods to identify, assess and synthesize information?
    • Bramwell VH, Williams CJ: Do authors of review articles use systematic methods to identify, assess and synthesize information? Ann Oncol 1997;8: 1185-1195
    • (1997) Ann Oncol , vol.8 , pp. 1185-1195
    • Bramwell, V.H.1    Williams, C.J.2
  • 25
    • 33644931936 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bias in clinical intervention research
    • Gluud LL: Bias in clinical intervention research. Am J Epidemiol 2006;163:493-501
    • (2006) Am J Epidemiol , vol.163 , pp. 493-501
    • Gluud, L.L.1
  • 26
    • 3042839311 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A comparison of yield in a non-systematic and a systematic review
    • Downer MC, Moles DR, Speight PM: A comparison of yield in a non-systematic and a systematic review. Community Dent Health 2004;21:138-142
    • (2004) Community Dent Health , vol.21 , pp. 138-142
    • Downer, M.C.1    Moles, D.R.2    Speight, P.M.3
  • 27
    • 33751018871 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidence-based medicine: Fifteen years later. Golem the good, the bad, and the ugly in need of a review?
    • Jenicek M. Evidence-based medicine: Fifteen years later. Golem the good, the bad, and the ugly in need of a review? Med Sci Monit 2006;12:RA241-51 (Pubitemid 44739914)
    • (2006) Medical Science Monitor , vol.12 , Issue.11
    • Jenicek, M.1
  • 29
    • 0031822234 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The management of established postherpetic neuralgia: A comparison of the quality and content of traditional vs. systematic reviews
    • DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02315.x
    • Ladhani S, Williams HC: The management of established postherpetic neuralgia: A comparison of the quality and content of traditional vs. systematic reviews. Br J Dermatol 1998;139:66-72 (Pubitemid 28338065)
    • (1998) British Journal of Dermatology , vol.139 , Issue.1 , pp. 66-72
    • Ladhani, S.1    Williams, H.C.2
  • 30
    • 16844386011 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Of mites and men: Reference bias in narrative review articles: a systematic review
    • Schmidt LM, Gotzsche PC: Of mites and men: Reference bias in narrative review articles: A systematic review. J Fam Pract 2005;54:334-338
    • (2005) J Fam Pract , vol.54 , pp. 334-338
    • Schmidt, L.M.1    Gotzsche, P.C.2
  • 31
    • 3042756772 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The use of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in infection control and hospital epidemiology
    • DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2003.10.004, PII S0196655303008149
    • Bent S, Shojania KG, Saint S: The use of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in infection control and hospital epidemiology. Am J Infect Control 2004;32: 246-254 (Pubitemid 38857902)
    • (2004) American Journal of Infection Control , vol.32 , Issue.4 , pp. 246-254
    • Bent, S.1    Shojania, K.G.2    Saint, S.3
  • 32
    • 0026652402 scopus 로고
    • A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction
    • Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, et al: A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA 1992;268:240-248
    • (1992) JAMA , vol.268 , pp. 240-248
    • Antman, E.M.1    Lau, J.2    Kupelnick, B.3
  • 33
    • 0031047837 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions
    • Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB: Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:376-380
    • (1997) Ann Intern Med , vol.126 , pp. 376-380
    • Cook, D.J.1    Mulrow, C.D.2    Haynes, R.B.3
  • 34
    • 0028120335 scopus 로고
    • Checklists for review articles
    • Oxman AD: Checklists for review articles. BMJ 1994; 309:648-651
    • (1994) BMJ , vol.309 , pp. 648-651
    • Oxman, A.D.1
  • 35
    • 0035240462 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidence syntheses in child health
    • Moyer VA: Evidence syntheses in child health. Ambul Pediatr 2001;1:53-58
    • (2001) Ambul Pediatr , vol.1 , pp. 53-58
    • Moyer, V.A.1
  • 36
    • 0033583746 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Users' guides to the medical literature: XVI. How to use a treatment recommendation. Evidence-based medicine working group and the Cochrane applicability methods working group
    • Guyatt GH, Sinclair J, Cook DJ, et al: Users' guides to the medical literature: XVI. How to use a treatment recommendation. Evidence-based medicine working group and the Cochrane applicability methods working group. JAMA 1999;281:1836-1843
    • (1999) JAMA , vol.281 , pp. 1836-1843
    • Guyatt, G.H.1    Sinclair, J.2    Cook, D.J.3
  • 37
    • 0024403234 scopus 로고
    • Quotation accuracy in review articles
    • Neihouse PF, Priske SC: Quotation accuracy in review articles. DICP 1989;23:594-596
    • (1989) DICP , vol.23 , pp. 594-596
    • Neihouse, P.F.1    Priske, S.C.2
  • 39
    • 0023315354 scopus 로고
    • The medical review article: State of the science
    • Mulrow CD: The medical review article: State of the science. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:485-488
    • (1987) Ann Intern Med , vol.106 , pp. 485-488
    • Mulrow, C.D.1
  • 40
    • 0033593076 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The medical review article revisited: Has the science improved?
    • McAlister FA, Clark HD, van Walraven C, et al: The medical review article revisited: Has the science improved? Ann Intern Med 1999;131:947-951
    • (1999) Ann Intern Med , vol.131 , pp. 947-951
    • McAlister, F.A.1    Clark, H.D.2    Van Walraven, C.3
  • 41
    • 36248934073 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 [Updated September 2006]
    • Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Chichester, UK, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2006
    • Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 [Updated September 2006]. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2006. Chichester, UK, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2006
    • (2006) The Cochrane Library , Issue.4
  • 43
    • 0033610734 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses
    • Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al: Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet 1999;354:1896-1900
    • (1999) Lancet , vol.354 , pp. 1896-1900
    • Moher, D.1    Cook, D.J.2    Eastwood, S.3
  • 44
    • 33947701090 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Many reviews are systematic but some are more transparent and completely reported than others
    • PLoS Medicine Editors
    • PLoS Medicine Editors: Many reviews are systematic but some are more transparent and completely reported than others. PLoS Med 2007;4:e147
    • (2007) PLoS Med , vol.4
  • 46
    • 0026655939 scopus 로고
    • Bias in meta-analytic research
    • Felson DT: Bias in meta-analytic research. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:885-892
    • (1992) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.45 , pp. 885-892
    • Felson, D.T.1
  • 47
    • 33846423538 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: An independent appraisal
    • DOI 10.1097/01.CCM.0000253394.15628.FD, PII 0000324620070200000036
    • Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Ferland A, et al: The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane database of systematic reviews: An independent appraisal. Crit Care Med 2007;35:589-594 (Pubitemid 46148553)
    • (2007) Critical Care Medicine , vol.35 , Issue.2 , pp. 589-594
    • Delaney, A.1    Bagshaw, S.M.2    Ferland, A.3    Laupland, K.4    Manns, B.5    Doig, C.6
  • 51
    • 34548415359 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic reviews: Time to address clinical and policy relevance as well as methodological rigor
    • Laupacis A, Straus S: Systematic reviews: Time to address clinical and policy relevance as well as methodological rigor. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:273-274 (Pubitemid 351664584)
    • (2007) Annals of Internal Medicine , vol.147 , Issue.4 , pp. 273-274
    • Laupacis, A.1    Straus, S.2
  • 52
    • 2342563376 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reporting of adverse drug reactions in randomised controlled trials-A systematic survey
    • Loke YK, Derry S: Reporting of adverse drug reactions in randomised controlled trials-A systematic survey. BMC Clin Pharmacol 2001;1:3
    • (2001) BMC Clin Pharmacol , vol.1 , pp. 3
    • Loke, Y.K.1    Derry, S.2
  • 53
    • 0035941525 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: An evaluation of 7 medical areas
    • Ioannidis JP, Lau J: Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: An evaluation of 7 medical areas. JAMA 2001;285:437-443
    • (2001) JAMA , vol.285 , pp. 437-443
    • Ioannidis, J.P.1    Lau, J.2
  • 56
    • 33748336479 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Analyses of cost data in economic evaluations conducted alongside randomized controlled trials
    • Doshi JA, Glick HA, Polsky D: Analyses of cost data in economic evaluations conducted alongside randomized controlled trials. Value Health 2006;9:334-340
    • (2006) Value Health , vol.9 , pp. 334-340
    • Doshi, J.A.1    Glick, H.A.2    Polsky, D.3
  • 57
    • 0032585183 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Analysis and interpretation of cost data in randomised controlled trials: Review of published studies
    • Barber JA, Thompson SG: Analysis and interpretation of cost data in randomised controlled trials: Review of published studies. BMJ 1998;317:1195-1200
    • (1998) BMJ , vol.317 , pp. 1195-1200
    • Barber, J.A.1    Thompson, S.G.2
  • 61
    • 0037240936 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine
    • DOI 10.1258/jrsm.96.1.17
    • Linde K, Willich SN: How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine. J R Soc Med 2003;96:17-22 (Pubitemid 36106273)
    • (2003) Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine , vol.96 , Issue.1 , pp. 17-22
    • Linde, K.1    Willich, S.N.2
  • 62
    • 15944422498 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews
    • Collins JA, Fauser BC: Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews. Hum Reprod Update 2005;11:103-104
    • (2005) Hum Reprod Update , vol.11 , pp. 103-104
    • Collins, J.A.1    Fauser, B.C.2
  • 64
    • 2542505640 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Differences between systematic reviews and health technology assessments: A trade-off between the ideals of scientific rigor and the realities of policy making
    • DOI 10.1017/S0266462304000959
    • Rotstein D, Laupacis A: Differences between systematic reviews and health technology assessments: A trade-off between the ideals of scientific rigor and the realities of policy making. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2004;20:177-183 (Pubitemid 38685949)
    • (2004) International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , vol.20 , Issue.2 , pp. 177-183
    • Rotstein, D.1    Laupacis, A.2
  • 65
  • 66
    • 33846953635 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic reviews, Cochrane and evidence- based medicine-Why I prize prudent scepticism above indefensible certainty
    • Burton MJ: Systematic reviews, Cochrane and evidence- based medicine-Why I prize prudent scepticism above indefensible certainty. Clin Otolaryngol 2007;32:60-63
    • (2007) Clin Otolaryngol , vol.32 , pp. 60-63
    • Burton, M.J.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.