Content-based image retrieval of spine radiographs with scoliosis

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 284-289

  Dinesh Kumar, Vathiath Peethambaran ^a   Thomas, Tessamma ^a   Menon, Krishnankutty Venugopal ^b  

^a Department of Polymer Science and Rubber Technology   (India)

^b AMRITA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

CBIR; Cobb measurement; Scoliosis; Scoliosis classification scheme

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; CONTENT ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; EVALUATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; STANDING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; HUMANS; MYELOGRAPHY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SCOLIOSIS;

EID: 68049132600     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31816d8148     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Martinez JM, Koenen R, Pereira F. MPEG-7: the generic multimedia content description standard. IEEE Multimedia (part 1). 2002;9:78-87. (Pubitemid 34550453)
2. Revet B. DICOM Cook Book for Implementations in Modalities. Eindhoven, Netherlands: Philips Medical Systems; 1997.
3. Guld MO, Kohnen M, Keysers D, et al. Quality of DICOM header information for image categorization. SPIE Proc. 2002; 4685:280-287. (Pubitemid 34918389)
4. Bozec CL, Jaulent MC, Zapletal E, et al. Unified modeling language and design of a case-based retrieval system in medical imaging. In: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium of the American Society for Medical Informatics (AMIA). Nashville, TN; 1998.
5. Bui AAT, Taira RK, Dionision JDN, et al. Evidence-based radiology. Acad Radiol. 2002;9:662-669.
6. Lehmann TM, Wein BB, Greenspan H. Integration of Content-based Image Retrieval to Picture Archiving and Communication Systems. In: Proceedings of Medical Informatics Europe (MIE 2003). Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2003.
7. Antani S, Long LR, Thoma GR. A biomedical information system for combined content-based retrieval of spine x-ray images and associated text information. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing (ICVGIP 2002). Ahamdabad, India; 2002:242-247.
8. Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG. Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs: intraobserver and interobserver variation. J Bone Joint Surg. 1990;72-A:328-333.
9. Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, et al. Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1990;72-A:320-327.
10. Stokes IAF, Aronsson DD. Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis. Spine. 2006;31:665-670.
11. Beauchamp M, Labelle H, Grimard G, et al. Diurnal variation of Cobb angle measurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1993;18:1581-1583. (Pubitemid 23280302)
12. Berliner L, Kreang-Arekul S, Kaufman L. Scoliosis evaluation by direct digital radiography and computerized post-processing. J Digit Imaging (suppl 1). 2002;15:270-274.
13. Shea KG, Stevens PM, Nelson M, et al. A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement. Spine. 1998; 23:551-555.
14. Wills BP, Auerbach JD, Zhu X, et al. Comparison of Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis radiographs with preselected end vertebrae: traditional versus digital acquisition. Spine. 2007;32:98-105. (Pubitemid 46061384)
15. Ponsetti IV, Friedman B. Prognosis in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1950;32:381-395.
16. Qiu G, Zhang J, Wang Y, et al. A new operative classification of idiopathic scoliosis: a Peking Union Medical College method. Spine. 2005;30:1419-1426. (Pubitemid 41754866)
17. Rhee JM, Bridwell KH, Won DS, et al. Sagittal plane analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of anterior versus posterior instrumentation. Spine. 2002;27:2350-2356.
18. Soucacos PN, Soucacos PK, Zacharis KC, et al. School-screening for Scoliosis-A Prospective Epidemiological Study in Northwestern and Central Greece. J Bone Joint Surg. 1997;79A:1498-1503.
19. Nachiappan C, Dangerfield PH, Giakas G, et al. Computer-assisted Cobb measurement of scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2002;11:353-357.
20. Stokes IAF, Aronsson DD. Identifying sources of variability in scoliosis classification using a rule-based automated algorithm. Spine. 2002;27:2801-2805.
21. King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, et al. The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1983;65-A: 1302-1313.
22. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001;83-A:1169-1181. (Pubitemid 32735067)
23. Lowe T, Berven SH, Schwab FJ, et al. The SRS classification for adult spinal deformity: building on the King/Moe and Lenke classification systems. Spine. 2006;31(19S):119-125. (Pubitemid 44337833)
24. Richards BS, Sucato DJ, Konigsberg DE, et al. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured. Spine. 2003;28:1148-1156. (Pubitemid 36667048)