Results of national survey of specialists on the clinical evaluation of faecal incontinence;Resultados de una encuesta nacional dirigida a especialistas sobre la evaluación clínica de pacientes con incontinencia fecal

Cirugia Espanola

Volumn 86, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 154-158

  Parés, David ^a   Pera, Miguel ^a   Cartanyà, Anna ^a   Delgado Aros, Silvia ^a   De Miguel, Mario ^b   Ortiz, Hector ^b   Grande, Luis ^a  

^a HOSPITAL DEL MAR   (Spain)

^b Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra   (Spain)

Author keywords

Diagnosis; Faecal incontinence; Scores; Specialists; Survey

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FECES INCONTINENCE; GASTROENTEROLOGY; GENERAL SURGERY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPAIN;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FECAL INCONTINENCE; GASTROENTEROLOGY; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPAIN;

EID: 68049129545     PISSN: 0009739X     EISSN: 1578147X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2009.01.030     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Del Rio C., Biondo S., and Marti-Rague J. [Fecal incontinence. Patient assessment and classical treatments]. Cir Esp 78 (2005) 34-40
2. Rockwood T.H., Church J.M., Fleshman J.W., Kane R.L., Mavrantonis C., Thorson A.G., et al. Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43 (2000) 9-16
3. Perry S., Shaw C., McGrother C., Matthews R.J., Assassa R.P., Dallosso H., et al. Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community. Gut 50 (2002) 480-484
4. Whitehead W.E. Fecal incontinence: a neglected area of gastroenterology. Gastroenterology 122 (2002) 5
5. Baxter N.N., Rothenberger D.A., and Lowry A.C. Measuring fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 46 (2003) 1591-1605
6. Parks AG. Royal Society of Medicine, Section of Proctology; Meeting 27 November 1974. President's Address. Anorectal incontinence. Proc R Soc Med. 1975;68:681-90.
7. Pescatori M., Anastasio G., Bottini C., and Mentasti A. New grading and scoring for anal incontinence. Evaluation of 335 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 35 (1992) 482-487
8. Jorge J.M., and Wexner S.D. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36 (1993) 77-97
9. Vaizey C.J., Carapeti E., Cahill J.A., and Kamm M.A. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44 (1999) 77-80
10. Baeten C., Bartolo D.C., Lehur P.A., Matzel K., Pescatori M., Roche B., et al. Consensus conference on faecal incontinence. Tech Coloproctol 11 (2007) 225-233
11. Pares D., Norton C., and Chelvanayagam S. Fecal incontinence: the quality of reported randomized, controlled trials in the last ten years. Dis Colon Rectum 51 (2008) 88-95
12. Madoff R.D., Parker S.C., Varma M.G., and Lowry A.C. Faecal incontinence in adults. Lancet 364 (2004) 621-632
13. Roig J.V., Garcia-Fadrique A., Garcia Armengol J., Villalba F.L., Bruna M., Sancho C., et al. [Use of nasogastric tubes and drains after colorectal surgery. Have attitudes changed in the last 10 years?]. Cir Esp 83 (2008) 78-84
14. Seow C.S., Teo N.B., Wilson C.R., and Oien K.A. Attitudes and training of research fellows in surgery: national questionnaire survey. BMJ 323 (2001) 725-726
15. Grossmann I., De Bock G.H., Van de Velde C.J., Kievit J., and Wiggers T. Results of a national survey among Dutch surgeons treating patients with colorectal carcinoma. Current opinion about follow-up, treatment of metastasis, and reasons to revise follow-up practice. Colorectal Dis 9 (2007) 787-792
16. Macmillan A.K., Merrie A.E., Marshall R.J., and Parry B.R. Design and validation of a comprehensive fecal incontinence questionnaire. Dis Colon Rectum 51 (2008) 1502-1522
17. Maeda Y., Pares D., Norton C., Vaizey C.J., and Kamm M.A. Does the St. Mark's incontinence score reflect patients' perceptions? A review of 390 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51 (2008) 436-442