The general linear model as structural equation modeling

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 485-506

  Graham, James M ^a  

^a WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

General linear model; Multiple regression; Statistics; Structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 68049127555     PISSN: 10769986     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/1076998607306151     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Arbuckle, J. L. (2003). Amos (Version 5.0.1) [Computer software]. Spring House, PA: Amos Development Corporation.
3. Bagozzi, R. P., Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Canonical correlation analysis as a special case of a structural relations model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 437-454.
4. Bray, J. H., & Maxwell, S. E. (1985). Multivariate analysis of variance. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5. Cohen, J. (1968). Multiple regression as a general data-analytic system. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 426-443.
6. Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1971). Multivariate data analysis. New York: John Wiley.
7. Courville, T., & Thompson, B. (2001). Use of structure coefficients in published multiple regression articles: b is not enough. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 229-248.
8. Fan, X. (1997). Canonical correlation analysis and structural equation modeling: What do they have in common? Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 65-79.
9. Graham, J. M., Guthrie, A., & Thompson, B. (2003). Consequences of not interpreting structure coefficients in published CFA research: A reminder. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 142-153.
10. Kerlinger, F. N., & Pedhazur, E. J. (1973). Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
11. Kline, R. B. (2004). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
12. Knapp, T. R. (1978). Canonical correlation analysis: A general parametric significance testing system. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 410-416.
13. MacCallum, R. C., & Browne, M. W. (1993). The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: Some practical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 533-541.
14. McNeil, K., Newman, I., & Kelly, F. J. (1996). Testing research hypotheses with the general linear model. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
15. O'Grady, K. E., & Medoff, D. R. (1988). Categorical variables in multiple regression: Some cautions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 243-260.
16. Stevens, J. (1972). Four methods of analyzing between variation for the k group MANOVA problem. Multivariate Behavior Research, 7, 499-522.
17. Thompson, B. (1984). Canonical correlation analysis: Uses and interpretation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18. Thompson, B. (1990). Don't forget the structure coefficients. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 178-180.
19. Thompson, B. (1991). A primer on the logic and use of canonical correlation analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 24, 80-95.
20. Thompson, B. (1997). The importance of structure coefficients in structural equation modeling confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 5-19.
21. Thompson, B. (1998, April). Five methodological errors in educational research: The pantheon of statistical significance and other faux pas. Invited address at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
22. Thompson, B., & Borrello, G. M. (1985). The importance of structure coefficients in regression research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 203-209.
23. Wolf, G., & Cartwright, B. (1974). Rules for coding dummy variables in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 173-179.