Privileged communication in the school psychologist-client relationship

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 307-318

  Jacob, Susan ^a   Powers, Katie E ^a  

^a CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68049126247     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: 15206807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.20377     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Available at: http://www/apa.org. The code is printed in American Psychologist, 57, 1060 - 1073.
2. Aronson, R. H. (2001). Symposium: The Uniform Rules of Evidence (1999): The mental health provider privilege in the wake of Jaffee v. Redmond. Oklahoma Law Review, 54, 591 - 612.
3. Curtis, M. J., Lopez, A. D., Batsche, G. M., & Smith, J. C. (2006, March). School psychology 2005: A national perspective. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Association of School Psychologists, Anaheim, CA.
4. Dailor, N. (2007). A national study of ethical transgressions and dilemmas reported by school psychology practitioners. Unpublished masters thesis, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan.
5. Dekraai, M., Sales, B., & Hall, S. (1998). Informed consent, confidentiality, and duty to report laws in the conduct of child therapy. In T. R. Kratochwill & R. J. Morris (Eds.), The practice of child therapy (3rd ed., pp. 350-559). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Glosoff, H. L., Herlihy, B., & Spence, E. B. (2000). Privileged communication in the counselor-client relationship. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78, 454-462.
7. Howell, R. J., & Ogles, B. M. (1989). Psychologist-client privileged communication laws for the fifty states: Duty to report, duty to warn. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 7, 5-24.
8. Jacob, S., & Hartshorne, T. S. (2007). Ethics and law for school psychologists (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
9. Jaffee v. Redmond, 51 F.3d 1346, 1358, 116 S. Ct. 334 (1996).
10. J. N. v. Bellingham School District No. 501, 74 Wn. App. 49, 871 P.2d. 1106, 1994 Wash. App. LEXIS 197 (Wash. Ct. App. 1994).
11. Knapp, S., & Vandecreek, L. (1985). Psychotherapy and privileged communication in child custody cases. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 398-407.
12. Legal Information Institute. (March 5, 2003). Uniform rules of evidence locator. Retrieved January 2, 2007, from http://www.law.cornell.edu/uniform/evidence.html.
13. Legal Information Institute. (June, 2007). Evidence. Retrieved July 5, 2007, from http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/index.php?title=Evidence&printable=yes.
14. Legal Information Institute. (n.d.). Law by source: Uniform Laws. Retrieved January 2, 2007, from http://www.law.cornell.edu/uniform/evidence.html.
15. McDuff v. Tamborlane, 1999 Conn. Super. LEXIS 1771.
16. National Association of School Psychologists. (2000). Professional conduct manual. Bethesda, MD: Author.
17. National Association of School Psychologists. (n.d.). National school psychology certification and licensure online resource list. Retrieved January 24, 2006, from http:www.nasponline.org/certification/state_info_list.html.
18. People v. Vincent Moreno, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2363 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005).
19. "Psychologist-patient privilege did not existwhen student admitted homicide to school psychologist" (2002). DOI Summaries, New York Law Journal, 222, p. 17.
20. Rubanowitz, D. E. (1987). Public attitudes toward psychotherapist-client confidentiality. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 613-618.
21. Siegel, M. (1979). Privacy, ethics, and confidentiality. Professional Psychology, 10, 249-258.
22. State v. Berberich, 267 Kan. 215, 978 P.2d 902, 1999 Kan. LEXIS 227 (Kan. 1999).
23. State v. Herendeen, 279 Ga. 323; 613 S.E. 2d 647; 2005 Ga. LEXIS 384; 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 1577 (Ga. 2005).
24. Taylor, L., & Adelman, H. S. (1989). Reframing the confidentiality dilemma to work in children's best interests. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 20, 79-83.
25. Uniform Rules of Evidence (1999). Retrieved January 3, 2007, from http://www.law.upenn.edu/bll/ulc/ulc frame.htm.
26. Wigmore, J. H. (1961). Evidence (Vol. 3, Sec. 2285). Boston: Little Brown.