The reputation of the corporate social responsibility industry in Australia

Australasian Marketing Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 84-91

  Truscott, Rachael A ^a   Bartlett, Jennifer L ^a   Tywoniak, Stephane A ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australia; Corporate social responsibility; Industry; Practice; Reputation

Indexed keywords

EID: 68049121856     PISSN: 14413582     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2009.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Adams C., and Zutshi A. Corporate social responsibility: why business should act responsibly and be accountable. Australian Accounting Review 14 3 (2004) 31
2. Adams M., and Hardwick P. An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. The Journal of Management Studies 35 5 (1998) 641
3. Aldrich H.E., and Fiol C.M. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review 19 4 (1994) 645
4. Australian Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility, 2007. The CSR Manager in Australia: Research Report on Working in Corporate Social Responsibility. Melbourne.
5. Australian Government Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee, 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility Discussion Paper.
6. Australian Government Department of Family and Community Services, 2005a. Corporate Australia Building Trust and Stronger Communities? A Review of Current Trends and Themes.
7. Australian Government Department of Family and Community Services, 2005b. Giving Australia: Research on Philanthropy in Australia: Summary of Findings.
8. Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage, 2005. The State of Sustainability Reporting in Australia: Centre for Australian Ethical Research, KPMG Sustainability Services & Deni Greene Consulting Services.
9. Baker and McKenzie. 2007. Corporate Responsibility: A Guide for Australian Directors: Baker & McKenzie).
10. In: Bartlett J.L. (Ed). The International Encyclopaedia of Communication (2008), Blackwell, Malden, MA
11. Boele R., and Kemp D. Social auditors: illegitimate offspring of the audit family? Finding legitimacy through a hybrid approach. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 17 (2005) 109
12. Brown G. Australia and New Zealand banking group (ANZ): aligning community strategy with business strategy. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 22 (2006) 18
13. Bruch H., and Walter F. The keys to rethinking corporate philanthropy. MIT Sloan Management Review 47 1 (2005) 49
14. Business Council of Australia, 2002. The Community of Business: The Role of the Corporation in Australia.
15. Campbell J.L. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review 32 3 (2007) 946
16. Carroll A.B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review (pre-1986) 4 000004 (1979) 17-25
17. Carroll A.B. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons 34 4 (1991) 39
18. Carroll A.B. Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society 38 3 (1999) 268-295
19. Centre for Corporate Public Affairs. Corporate Community Involvement: Establishing a Business Case (2000), Centre for Corporate Public Affairs and the Business Council of Australia, Sydney
20. Centre for Corporate Public Affairs. Public affairs shifts to centre stage. Corporate Public Affairs 11 1 (2001) 7-16
21. Clegg S.R., Rhodes C., and Kornberger M. Desperately seeking legitimacy: organizational identity and emerging industries. Organization Studies 28 4 (2007) 495
22. Coelho P.R.P., McClure J.E., and Spry J.A. The social responsibility of corporate management: a classical critique. Mid-American Journal of Business 18 1 (2003) 15
23. CPA Australia, 2005. Confidence in Corporate Reporting.
24. d Astous A., and Bitz P. Consumer evaluations of sponsorship programmes. European Journal of Marketing 29 12 (1995) 6
25. De Bakker F.G.A., Groenewegen P., and Den Hond F. A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business and Society 44 3 (2005) 283-317
26. Deegan C., and Gordon B. A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research 26 3 (1996) 187
27. Déjean F., Gond J.-P., and Leca B. Measuring the unmeasured: an institutional entrepreneur strategy in an emerging industry. Human Relations 57 6 (2004) 741
28. DiMaggio P.J. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In: Zucker L.G. (Ed). Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment. (1988), Ballinger, Cambridge, MA
29. DiMaggio P.J., and Powell W.W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organization fields. American Sociological Review 48 (1983) 147-160
30. Elkington J. Cannibals with Forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business (1998), New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC Stony Creek, CT
31. Fligstein N. Social skill and institutional theory. The American Behavioral Scientist 40 4 (1997) 397
32. Fligstein N. Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory 19 2 (2001) 105-125
33. Gardberg N.A., and Fombrun C.J. Corporate citizenship: creating intangible assets across institutional environments. The Academy of Management Review 31 2 (2006) 329
34. Garriga E., and Mele D.N. Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics 53 1 (2004) 51-71
35. Giddens A. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis (1979), University of California Press, Berkley, Calif
36. Godfrey P.C. The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: a risk management perspective. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review 30 4 (2005) 777
37. Golob U., and Bartlett J.L. Communicating about corporate social responsibility: a comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia. Public Relations Review 33 1 (2007) 1
38. Gray R., Owen D., and Adams C. Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting (1996), Prentice Hall, London New York
39. Greening D.W., and Turban D.B. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business and Society 39 3 (2000) 254
40. Griffin J.J., and Dunn P. Corporate public affairs: commitment, resources, and structure. Business and Society 43 2 (2004) 196-221
41. Group of 100 Inc., 2003. Sustainability: A Guide to Tripple Bottom Line Reporting.
42. Habisch A., Jonker J., Wegner M., and Schmidpeter R. Corporate Social Responsibility Across Europe: Discovering National Perspectives of Corporate Citizenship (2005), Heidelberg, Springer Berlin
43. Harris E. Corporate giving goes both ways. Sales and Marketing Management 152 12 (2000) 104
44. Hatch M.J. Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives (2006), Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York
45. Hoffman A.J. Linking organizational and field-level analyses: the diffusion of corporate environmental practice. Organization and Environment 14 2 (2001) 133
46. Hoffman R.C. Corporate social responsibility in the 1920s: an institutional perspective. Journal of Management History 13 1 (2007) 55
47. KPMG, 2006. Carbon Disclosure Report 2006 Australia & New Zealand: In conjuction with the Investor Group on Climate Change (IGCC) Australia/New Zealand.
48. Lawrence T.B., and Suddaby R. Institutions and Institutional Work. second ed. (2006), Sage, London, Thousand Oaks, Calif
49. Lounsbury M., Ventresca M., and Hirsch P.M. Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: a cultural-political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Economic Review 1 1 (2003) 71
50. Loza J., and Ogilvie S. Corporate Australia Building Trust and Stronger Communities? A Review of Current Trends and Themes: Prime Minister's Community Business Partnership (2005), Department of Family and Community Services
51. Margolis J.D., and Walsh J.P. Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly 48 2 (2003) 268
52. Marquis C., Glynn M.A., and Davis G.F. Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review 32 3 (2007) 925
53. Marshall C., and Rossman G.B. Designing Qualitative Research (1999), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California
54. Mason J. Qualitative Researching (2005), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California
55. Matten, D., Moon, J., 2004. 'Implicit' and 'Explicit' CSR: A conceptual framework for understanding CSR in Europe. ICCSR Research Paper Series, 29.
56. Miles M.B., and Huberman A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis: an Expanded Sourcebook (1994), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
57. Mintzberg H. The case for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Strategy 4 2 (1983) 3
58. Moullakis J. Banks ready to branch out again. Australian Financial Review (2003) 49
59. Murray K.B., and Montanari J.R. Strategic management of the socially responsible firm: integrating management and marketing theory. Academy of Management Review 11 4 (1986) 815-827
60. Orlitzky M., and Benjamin J.D. Corporate social performance and firm risk: a meta-analytic review. Business and Society 40 4 (2001) 369-396
61. Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, 2006. Corporate Social Responsibility: Managing Risk and Creative Value.
62. Porac J.F., Thomas H., Wilson F., Paton D., and Kanfer A. Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 2 (1995) 203
63. Powell W.W., and DiMaggio P.J. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
64. Ravasi, D., Fombrun, C. J., 2004. Analysing industry reputation in the Italian banking sector. Paper presented at the Reputation Institute.
65. Redmond L. Cisco systems: global programme: local impact. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 17 (2005) 69
66. Schwartz M.S., and Carroll A.B. Corporate social responsibility: a three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 4 (2003) 503
67. Scott W.R. Unpacking institutional arguments. In: Powell W.W., and DiMaggio P.J. (Eds). The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis (1991), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 164-182
68. Scott W.R. Institutions and Organizations. second ed. (2001), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
69. Sethi S.P. Dimensions of corporate social performance: an analytical framework. California Management Review 17 3 (1975) 58-64
70. Sewell W.H. A theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformation. The American Journal of Sociology 98 1 (1992) 1-29
71. Stuart H., and Muzellec L. Corporate makeovers: can a hyena be rebranded?. Journal of Brand Management 11 6 (2004) 472
72. Suchman M.C. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review 20 3 (1995) 571-650
73. Turban D.B., and Greening D.W. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal 40 3 (1997) 658-672
74. Varadarajan P.R., and Alcorn D.S. Cause related marketing: a new direction in the marketing of corporate responsibility. Journal of Marketing 52 3 (1988) 58-74
75. Vermeulen P., Buch R., and Greenwood R. The impact of governmental policies in institutional fields: the case of innovation in the Dutch concrete industry. Organization Studies 28 4 (2007) 515
76. Volunteering Australia, 2003. Corporate Shares Community Profits: A Guide to Engaging Your Employees.
77. Waddock S. Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility. The Academy of Management Perspectives 22 3 (2008) 87-108
78. Yin R. Applications of Case Study Research (1993), Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif
79. Yin R. Case Study Research: Design and Methods vol. 5 (2003), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif
80. Zappala G. Corporate citizenship and human resource management: a new tool or a missed opportunity?. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 42 2 (2004) 185