Social motivation affects the display of individual discrimination in young and adult Japanese Quail (Coturnix japonica)

Developmental Psychobiology

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 311-321

  Schweitzer, C ^a,b,c,d   Poindron, P ^a,b,c,d   Arnould, C ^a,b,c,d  

^a UMR85 PHYSIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION ET DES COMPORTEMENTS   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

^d Haras Nationaux   (France)

Author keywords

Age effect; Bird; Familiarity; Social preference; Social reinstatement behavior

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; AVES; COTURNIX; COTURNIX JAPONICA; PHASIANIDAE;

AGE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COTURNIX; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; MALE; MOTIVATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

AGE FACTORS; ANIMALS; COTURNIX; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; MALE; MOTIVATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 68049087774     PISSN: 00121630     EISSN: 10982302     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dev.20370     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adkins, E. K. (1973). Functional castration of the female Japanese quail. Physiology & Behavior, 10, 619-621.
2. Arnould, C., Béry, A., & Porter, R. H. (2007). Individual discrimination following 24h of pair contact in one- and seven-day-old Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Behaviour, 145, 327-345.
3. Balthazart, J., Massa, R., & Negri-Cesi, P. (1979). Photoperiodic control of testosterone metabolism, plasma gonadotrophins, cloacal gland growth, and reproductive behavior in the Japanese quail. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 39, 222-235.
4. Bilcik, B., & Bessei, W. (1993). Feather pecking in Japanese quail - Comparison of six different lines. Proceedings of the 27th International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, Berlin (Germany), p. 291-293.
5. Bradshaw, R. H. (1991). Discrimination of group members by laying hens Gallus domesticus. Behavioural Processes, 24(2), 143-151.
6. Bradshaw, R. H. (1992). Conspecific discrimination and social preference in the laying hen. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 33(1), 69-75.
7. Cabin, R. J., & Mitchell, R. J. (2000). To Bonferroni or not to Bonferroni: When and how are the questions. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 81, 246-248.
8. Dawkins, M. S. (1996). Distance and social recognition in hens: Implications for the use of photographs as social stimuli. Behaviour, 133, 663-680.
9. Edens, F.W., Bursian, S. J., & Holladay, S. D. (1983). Grouping in Japanese quail. 1. Agonistic Behavior during feeding. Poultry Science, 62, 1647-1651.
10. Evans, R. M. (1967). Early aggressive responses in domestic chicks. Animal Behaviour, 16, 24-28.
11. Formanek, L., Houdelier C., Lumineau, S., Bertin, A., Cabanès, G., & Richard-Yris, M.-A. (2008). Selection of social traits in juvenile Japanese quail affects adults' behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 112(1-2), 174-186. Francois, N., Decros, S., Picard, M., Faure, J. M., & Mills, A. D. (2000). Effect of group disruption on social behaviour in lines of Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) selected for high or low levels of social reinstatement behaviour. Behavioural Processes, 48(3), 171-181.
12. Francois, N., Decros, S., Picard, M., Faure, J. M., & Mills, A. D. (2000). Effect of group disruption on social behaviour in lines of Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) selected for high or low levels of social reinstatement behaviour. Behavioural Processes, 48(3) 171-181.
13. Francois, N., Mills, A. D., & Faure, J. M. (1998). Place preferences of Japanese quail given a permanent choice between a social or a non-social but enriched situation. Behavioural Processes, 43(2), 163-170.
14. Francois, N., Mills, A. D., & Faure, J.M. (1999). Inter-individual distances during open-field tests in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) selected for high or low levels of social reinstatement behaviour. Behavioural Processes, 47(2), 73-80.
15. Gobbini, M. I., & Haxby, J. V. (2007). Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces. Neuropsychologia, 45(1), 32-41.
16. Hauser, J., & Huber-Eicher, B. (2004). Do domestic hens discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics in the absence of visual cues? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 85(1-2), 65-76.
17. Jones, R. B., & Mills, A. D. (1999). Divergent selection for social reinstatement behaviour in Japanese quail: Effects on sociality and social discrimination. Poultry and Avian Biology Reviews, 10(4), 213-223.
18. Jones, R. B., Mills, A. D., & Faure, J.-M. (1996). Social discrimination in Japanese quail Coturnix japonica chicks genetically selected for low or high social reinstatement motivation. Behavioural Processes, 36(2), 117-124.
19. Launay, F., Mills, A. D., & Faure, J. M. (1991). Social motivation in Japanese quail Coturnix coturnix japonica chicks selected for high or low levels of treadmill behaviour. Behavioural Processes, 24(2), 95-110.
20. Ligout, S., & Porter, R. H. (2006). La reconnaissance sociale chez les mammifères: Mécanismes impliqués et bases sensorielles impliquées. INRA Productions Animales, 19(2), 119-133.
21. Ligout, S., Porter, R. H., & Bon, R. (2002). Social discrimination in lambs: Persistence and scope. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 76(3), 239-248.
22. Mills, A. D., Crawford, L. L., Domjan, M., & Faure, J. M. (1997). The behavior of the Japanese or domestic quail Coturnix japonica. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 21(3), 261-281.
23. Mills, A. D., & Faure, J. M. (1990). The treadmill test for the measurement of social motivation in Phasianidae chicks. Medical Science Research, 18, 179-180.
24. Mills, A. D., & Faure, J.-M. (1991). Divergent selection for duration of tonic immobility and social reinstatement behavior in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) chicks. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 105, 25-38.
25. Mills, A. D., Jones, R. B., Faure, J.-M., & Williams, J. B. (1993). Responses to isolation in Japanese quail genetically selected for high or low sociality. Physiology & Behavior, 53(1), 183-189.
26. Orcutt, F. S., & Orcutt, A. B. (1976). Nesting and parental behavior in domestic common quail. The Auk, 93, 135-141.
27. Perneger, T. V. (1998). What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. British Medical Journal, 316(7139), 1236-1238.
28. Rice, W. R. (1989). Analysing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, 43, 223-225.
29. Richard, S., Arnould, C., Guémené, D., Leterrier, C., Mignon-Grasteau, S., & Faure, J. M. (2008). Etude de la ré activité émotionnelle chez la caille: Une approche intégrée du biene ̂tre animal. INRA Production Animales, 21(1), 71-78.
30. Riters, L. V., & Balthazart, J. (1998). Behavioral evidence for individual recognition in Japanese quail. Behaviour, 135, 551-578.
31. Ryan, C. M. E., & Lea, S. E. G. (1994). Images of conspecifics as categories to be discriminated by pigeons and chickens: Slides, video tapes, stuffed birds and live birds. Behavioural Processes, 33(1-2), 155-175.
32. Schlinger, B. A., Palter, B., & Callard, G. V. (1987). A method to quantify aggressiveness in Japanese quail (Coturnix c. japonica). Physiology & Behavior, 40, 343-348.
33. Schmid, I., & Wechsler, B. (1997). Behaviour of Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) kept in semi-natural aviaries. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 55(1-2), 103-112.
34. Väisänen, J., & Jensen, P. (2004). Responses of young Red Jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) and White Leghorn layers to familiar and unfamiliar stimuli. Poultry Science, 83, 335-343.
35. Vallortigara, G. (1992). Affiliation and aggression as related to gender in domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 106, 53-57.
36. Vallortigara, G., & Andrew, R. J. (1994). Differential involvement of right and left hemisphere in individual recognition in the domestic chick. Behavioural Processes, 33(1-2), 41-57.
37. Vallortigara, G., Cailotto, M., & Zanforlin, M. (1990). Sexdifferences in social reinstatement motivation of the domestic chick (Gallus-Gallus) revealed by runway tests with social and nonsocial reinforcement. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 104(4), 361-367.
38. Zajonc, R. B., Wilson, W. R., & Rajecki, D. W. (1975). Affiliation and social discrimination produced by brief exposure in day-old domestic chicks. Animal Behaviour, 23, 131-138.