Failure of screening or failure to screen? The screening behavior of patients with colorectal cancer in the Leipzig area;Vorsorgemuffel oder screeningversager? Vorsorgeverhalten von patienten mit kolorektalem karzinom in der region Leipzig

Deutsches Arzteblatt

Volumn 106, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 195-201

  Schoppmeyer, Konrad ^a   Spieker, Henning ^a   Mössner, Joachim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Health services research; Screening test; Stool test

Indexed keywords

AGE; AGED; ANEMIA; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; DEFECATION HABIT; FEAR; FECES ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GERMANY; HEALTH BELIEF; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEGLIGENCE; OCCULT BLOOD; OCCULT BLOOD TEST; PAIN; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCREENING TEST; WEAKNESS; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

AGED; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 68049083722     PISSN: 00121207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0195     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Robert-Koch-Institut: Dachdokumentation Krebs. 11/2008; www.rki.de
2. Schmiegel W, Pox C, Adler G et al.: S3-Guidelines Conference "Colorectal Carcinoma" 2004. Z Gastroenterol 2004; 42: 1129-1177
3. Hewitson P, Glasziou P,Watson E, Towler B, Irwig L: Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 1541-1549 (Pubitemid 351813919)
4. Collins JF, Lieberman DA, Durbin TE,Weiss DG: Accuracy of screening for fecal occult blood on a single stool sample obtained by digital rectal examination: a comparison with recommended sampling practice. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 81-85
5. Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Eisenbach T: Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 620-627 (Pubitemid 33587036)
6. Zentralinstitut der Kassenärztlichen Versorgung: Wissenschaftliches Begleitprogramm zur Früherkennungskoloskopie. 11/2008; http://daris.kbv.de/ daris.asp
7. Newcomb PA, Storer BE, Morimoto LM, Templeton A, Potter JD: Long-term efficacy of sigmoidoscopy in the reduction of colorectal cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95: 622-625 (Pubitemid 36553509)
8. Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP Jr,Weiss NS: A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 653-657
9. Verne JE, Aubrey R, Love SB, Talbot IC, Northover JM: Population based randomized study of uptake and yield of screening by flexible sigmoidoscopy compared with screening by faecal occult blood testing. BMJ 1998; 317: 182-185 (Pubitemid 28325545)
10. Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R, Barcherini S, Crespi M: Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut 2001; 48: 812-815 (Pubitemid 32476984)
11. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al.: Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1977-1981
12. Lieberman DA,Weiss DG, Harford WV et al.: Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2007; 133: 1077-1085 (Pubitemid 47494453)
13. Singh H, Turner D, Xue L, Targownik LE, Bernstein CN: Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies. JAMA 2006; 295: 2366-2373 (Pubitemid 43788104)
14. Hüppe D, Hartmann H, Felten G et al.: Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in a community-based study. Z Gastroenterol 2008; 46: 193-200. (Pubitemid 351326482)
15. Stiftung Lebensblicke.11/ 2008; www.lebensblicke.de
16. Felix-Burda-Stiftung. 11/ 2008; www.felix-burda-stiftung.de
17. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, Rothwell DM, Vinden C, Rabeneck L: Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: A population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 96-102. (Pubitemid 46108740)
18. Farrar WD, Shawney MS, Nelson DB, Lederle FA, Bond JH: Colorectal cancers found after complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 1259-1264
19. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RL: Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2533-2541
20. Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ, Melton LJ III: A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 3186-3194
21. Ell C, Fischbach W, Bronisch HJ et al.: Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 883-893
22. Rosman AS, Korsten MA: Meta-analysis comparing CT colonography, air contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy. Am J Med 2007; 120: 203-210
23. Schoofs N, Devière J, Van Gossum A: PillCam colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy for colorectal tumor diagnosis: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 971-977 (Pubitemid 44615230)
24. Habermann JK, Roblick UJ, Luke BT et al.: Increased serum levels of complement C3a anaphylatoxin indicate the presence of colorectal tumors. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 1020-1029