An alternative procedure for modeling of Knudsen flow and surface diffusion

Periodica Polytechnica Chemical Engineering

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 37-55

  Argönül, Aykut ^a   Keil, Frerich J ^a  

^a HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cylindrical pore; Equilibrium assumption; Knudsen flow; Projection approach; Surface diffusion

Indexed keywords

FLOW OF GASES; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; SURFACE DIFFUSION;

ALTERNATIVE PROCEDURES; CONDITION; CYLINDRICAL PORES; EQUILIBRIUM ASSUMPTION; KNUDSEN DIFFUSION; KNUDSEN FLOW; PROJECTION APPROACH; RATE DISTRIBUTIONS; SURFACE FLOW RATES; TRANSMISSION PROBABILITIES;

FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD;

EID: 67949121977     PISSN: 03245853     EISSN: 15873765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3311/pp.ch.2008-2.01     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Reyes SC, Sinfelt JH, DeMartin GJ, Diffusion in Porous Solids: The Parallel Contribution of Gas and Surface Diffusion Processes in Pores Extending from the Mesoporous Region into the Microporous Region, Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 104, 5750-5761.
2. Zalc JM, Reyes SC, Iglesia E, Monte-Carlo simulations of surface and gas phase diffusion in complex porous structures, Chemical Engineering Science 58 (2003), 4605-4617.
3. Rieckmann C, Keil FJ, Simulation and experiment of multicomponent diffusion, Chemical Engineering Science 54 (1999), 3485-3493, DOI 10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00480-1.
4. Choi JG, Do DD, Do HD, Surface Diffusion of Adsorbed Molecules in Porous Media: Monolayer, Multilayer, and Capillary Condensation Regimes, Industrial Engineering and Chemistry Research 40 (2001), 4005-4031, DOI 10.1021/ie010195z.
5. Keil F, Diffusion and Chemische Reaktionen in der Gas/Feststoff-Katalyse, Springer Verlag Heidelberg, 1999.
6. Kapoor A, Yang RT, Wong C, Surface Diffusion, Catalysis Review Science and Engineering 31 (1989), no. 1-2, 129-214.
7. Miyabe K, Guiochon G, Correlation between Surface Diffusion and Molecular Diffusion in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography, Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 105 (2001), 9202-9209.
8. Do DD, Adsorption Analysis: Equilibria and Kinetics, Imperial College Press, 1998.
9. Jackson R, Transport in Catalysis, Elsevier Scientific Publication Company, 1977.
10. Karger J, Ruthven DM, Diffusion in Zeolites and other Microporous Solids, John Wiley & Sons, 1992.
11. Krishna R, Weselingh JA, The Maxwell-Stefan approach to mass transfer, Chemical Engineering Science 52 (1997), no. 6, 861-911, DOI 10.1016/S0009-2509(96)00458-7.
12. Luss D, Diffusion-Reaction Interactions in Catalyst pellets, Chemical Reaction and Reactor Engineering (Carberry JJ, ed.), Dekker, 2003, pp. 248.
13. Mota JPB, Adsorption and Transport in Nanoporous Materials, Nanoporous Materials Science and Engineering (Lu GQ, Zhao XS, eds.), Imperial College Press, 2004, pp. 705.
14. Satterfield CN, Mass Transfer in Heterogeneous Catalysis, Robert E. Krieger Publishing, 1970.
15. Hu X, Do DD, Rao GN, Experimental Concentration Dependence of Surface Diffusivity of Hydrocarbons in Activated Carbon, Chemical Engineering Science 49 (1994), no. 13, 2145-2152, DOI 10.1016/S0009-2509(94)85059-3.
16. Yang J, Cermakova J, Uchytil P, Hamel C, Seidel-Morgenstern A, Gas phase transport and surface diffusion in a porous glass membrane, Catalysis Today 104 (2005), 344-351, DOI 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.03.069.
17. Doraiswamy LK, Sharma MM, Heterogeneous Reactions: Analysis, Examples, and Reactor Design: Volume 1: Gas-Solid and Solid-Solid Reactions, John Wiley & Sons, 1984.
18. Argönül A, Argönül L, Keil FJ, The Inconsistency in Modeling Surface Diffusion with Adsorption Equilibrium, Journal of the University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy 42 (2007), no. 2, 181-186.
19. Steckelmacher W, Knudsen flow 75 years on: the current state of the art for flow of rarefied gases in tubes and systems 49 (1986), 1083-1107.
20. Datta R, Rinker RG, The Flow of Rarefied Gases Through Long Tubes of Circular Cross-Section, The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 59 (1981), 268-278. June.
21. Jakobtorweihen S, Lowe CP, Keil FJ, Smith B, Diffusion of chain molecules and mixtures in carbon nanotubes: The effect of host lattice flexibility and theory of diffusion in the Knudsen regime, The Journal of Chemical Physics 127 (2007), no. 2, 024904, DOI 10.1063/1.2753477.
22. Greenwood J, The correct and incorrect generation of a cosine law distribution of scattered particles for Monte-Carlo modeling of vacuum systems, Vacuum 67 (2002), 217-222.
23. Knudsen M, Kinetic Theory of Gases, Methuen and Co. Ltd, JohnWiley and Sons. Inc., 1952.
24. Knudsen M, The cosine law in the kinetic theory of gases, Annalen der Physik 48 (1915), 1113-1121. NASA technical translation, Washington DC, F-486.
25. Golub HG, Van Loan CF, Matrix Computations, The Johns Hopkins University Press (Baltimore), 1989. Second Edition.
26. Chen Y, Yang RT, Carbon 36 (1998), no. 10, 1525-1537, DOI 10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00144-4.
27. Gilliland ER, Baddour RF, Russell JL, Rates of Flow Through Microporous Solids, American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal 4 (1958), no. 1, 90-96, DOI 10.1002/aic.690040117.
28. 28 Poling BE, Prausnitz JM, O'Connell JP, The Porperties of Gases and Liquids. Fifth Edition.
29. Steckelmacher W, The effect of cross-sectional shape on the molecular flow in long tubes, Vacuum 28 (1978), no. 6/7, 269-275, DOI 10.1016/0042-207X(78)90016-7.
30. O'Hanlon JF, A User's Guide to Vacuum Technology, John Wiley and Sons, 2003. Third Edition.
31. Szwemin P, Niewinski M, Comparison of transmission probabilities calculated by Monte Carlo simulation and analytical methods, Vacuum 67 (2002), 359-362, DOI 10.1016/S0042-207X(02)00225-7.
32. Davies CM, Lucas CB, The failure of theory to predict the density distribution of gas flowing through a tube under free molecular conditions, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 16 (1983), 1-16.