메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 288-303

U.S. experience with transferable development rights

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LAND MARKET; LAND RIGHTS; LAND USE; ZONING POLICY;

EID: 67949115728     PISSN: 17506816     EISSN: 17506824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/reep/rep008     Document Type: Conference Paper
Times cited : (52)

References (21)
  • 1
    • 0003725589 scopus 로고
    • Spatial-equilibrium analysis of transferable development rights
    • Carpenter, Bruce E., and Dennis R. Heffley. 1982. Spatial-equilibrium analysis of transferable development rights. Journal of Urban Economics 12: 238-61.
    • (1982) Journal of Urban Economics , vol.12 , pp. 238-261
    • Carpenter, B.E.1    Heffley, D.R.2
  • 2
    • 67949093637 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Market design: Auctions and matching
    • Forthcoming, ed. John Siegfried. Harvard University Press
    • Cramton, Peter. Forthcoming. Market design: Auctions and matching. In Better living through economics, ed. John Siegfried. Harvard University Press.
    • Better living through economics
    • Cramton, P.1
  • 3
    • 0242601272 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why are there NIMBYs?
    • Fischel, William A. 2001. Why are there NIMBYs? Land Economics 77 (1): 144-52.
    • (2001) Land Economics , vol.77 , Issue.1 , pp. 144-152
    • Fischel, W.A.1
  • 4
    • 0031423725 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • From landmarks to landscapes: A review of current practices in the transfer of development rights
    • Johnston, R. A., and Mary E. Madison. 1997. From landmarks to landscapes: A review of current practices in the transfer of development rights. Journal of the American Planning Association 63: 365-78.
    • (1997) Journal of the American Planning Association , vol.63 , pp. 365-378
    • Johnston, R.A.1    Madison, M.E.2
  • 5
    • 0007098708 scopus 로고
    • Market-based regulatory approaches: A comparative discussion of environmental and land use techniques in the United States
    • Kayden, Jerold S. 1992. Market-based regulatory approaches: A comparative discussion of environmental and land use techniques in the United States. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 19 (3): 565-80.
    • (1992) Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review , vol.19 , Issue.3 , pp. 565-580
    • Kayden, J.S.1
  • 7
    • 0142122198 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A framework for evaluating transferable development rights programmes
    • Machemer, Patricia L., and Michael D. Kaplowitz. 2002. A framework for evaluating transferable development rights programmes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 45 (6): 773-95.
    • (2002) Journal of Environmental Planning and Management , vol.45 , Issue.6 , pp. 773-795
    • Machemer, P.L.1    Kaplowitz, M.D.2
  • 8
    • 38849159473 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How well can markets for development rights work? Evaluating a farmland preservation program
    • McConnell, Virginia, Elizabeth Kopits, and Margaret Walls. 2006. How well can markets for development rights work? Evaluating a farmland preservation program. Journal of Environment and Planning 49 (5): 631-52.
    • (2006) Journal of Environment and Planning , vol.49 , Issue.5 , pp. 631-652
    • McConnell, V.1    Kopits, E.2    Walls, M.3
  • 9
    • 67949110420 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Markets for preserving farmland in Maryland: Making TDR programs work better
    • February. Queenstown, Maryland
    • McConnell, Virginia, Margaret Walls, and Francis Kelly. 2007. Markets for preserving farmland in Maryland: Making TDR programs work better. Report prepared for the Maryland Center for Agroecology. February. Queenstown, Maryland.
    • (2007) Report prepared for the Maryland Center for Agroecology
    • McConnell, V.1    Walls, M.2    Kelly, F.3
  • 10
    • 33645925327 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Zoning, TDRs, and the density of development
    • McConnell, Virginia, Margaret Walls, and Elizabeth Kopits. 2006. Zoning, TDRs, and the density of development. Journal of Urban Economics 59: 440-57.
    • (2006) Journal of Urban Economics , vol.59 , pp. 440-457
    • McConnell, V.1    Walls, M.2    Kopits, E.3
  • 11
    • 67949115086 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Transferable development rights programs: An economic framework for success
    • Messer, Kent D. 2007. Transferable development rights programs: An economic framework for success. Journal of Conservation Planning 3: 47-56.
    • (2007) Journal of Conservation Planning , vol.3 , pp. 47-56
    • Messer, K.D.1
  • 12
    • 0010582371 scopus 로고
    • Transferable development rights markets
    • Mills, David E. 1980. Transferable development rights markets. Journal of Urban Economics 7: 63-74.
    • (1980) Journal of Urban Economics , vol.7 , pp. 63-74
    • Mills, D.E.1
  • 13
    • 0003286107 scopus 로고
    • Is zoning a negative sum game?
    • Mills, David E. 1989. Is zoning a negative sum game? Land Economics 65 (1): 1-12.
    • (1989) Land Economics , vol.65 , Issue.1 , pp. 1-12
    • Mills, D.E.1
  • 14
    • 67949093636 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • New Jersey Department of Community Affairs, Office of Smart Growth, January 3
    • New Jersey Department of Community Affairs, Office of Smart Growth. 2006. Transfer of development rights real estate market analysis rules, January 3. http://www.state.nj.us/dca/divisions/osg/docs/tdrrules.pdf.
    • (2006) Transfer of development rights real estate market analysis rules
  • 15
    • 67949099836 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Established TDR programs of New Jersey
    • New Jersey Highlands Water Protection and Planning Council
    • New Jersey Highlands Water Protection and Planning Council. 2007. Established TDR programs of New Jersey. Transfer of development rights technical report. http://liberty.state.nj.us/agriculture/sadc/tdr/ casestudy/tdrexamplesnj.pdf.
    • (2007) Transfer of development rights technical report
  • 16
    • 0032693255 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Opposition to housing NIMBY and beyond
    • Pendall, Rolf. 1999. Opposition to housing NIMBY and beyond. Urban Affairs Review 35 (1): 112-36.
    • (1999) Urban Affairs Review , vol.35 , Issue.1 , pp. 112-136
    • Pendall, R.1
  • 18
    • 67949102879 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rossing, Faith Elliott, Steve Cohoon, and Megan DelGaudio. 2005. Queen Anne's County land preservation. Centreville, MD: Queen Anne-s County Department of Planning and Zoning. San Luis Obispo, Land Conservancy. 2008. http://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Assets/PL/TDC+Reports/ Land+Transfer+Bank+Summary.pdf.
    • Rossing, Faith Elliott, Steve Cohoon, and Megan DelGaudio. 2005. Queen Anne's County land preservation. Centreville, MD: Queen Anne-s County Department of Planning and Zoning. San Luis Obispo, Land Conservancy. 2008. http://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Assets/PL/TDC+Reports/ Land+Transfer+Bank+Summary.pdf.
  • 19
    • 67949091989 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Tahoe Basin marketable rights transfer program assessment
    • Solimar Research Group, Lake Tahoe. Ventura, CA: Solimar Research Group
    • Solimar Research Group. 2003. Tahoe Basin marketable rights transfer program assessment. Report prepared for the League to Save Lake Tahoe. Ventura, CA: Solimar Research Group.
    • (2003) Report prepared for the League to Save
  • 20
    • 22644449442 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Letting the market preserve land: The case for a market-driven transfer of development rights program
    • Thorsnes, Paul, and Gerald P.W. Simon. 1999. Letting the market preserve land: The case for a market-driven transfer of development rights program. Contemporary Economic Policy 17 (2): 256-66.
    • (1999) Contemporary Economic Policy , vol.17 , Issue.2 , pp. 256-266
    • Thorsnes, P.1    Simon, G.P.W.2
  • 21
    • 67949107361 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Walls, Margaret, and Virginia McConnell. 2007. Transfer of development rights in U.S. communities: Evaluating program design, implementation and outcomes. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. September.
    • Walls, Margaret, and Virginia McConnell. 2007. Transfer of development rights in U.S. communities: Evaluating program design, implementation and outcomes. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. September.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.