Perceptual tests of rhythmic similarity: II. syllable rhythm

Language and Speech

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 343-359

  Kim, Jeesun ^a   Davis, Chris ^a   Cutler, Anne ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

French; Korean; Rhythm; Segmentation; Word recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 67949088060     PISSN: 00238309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0023830908099069     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
2. Barry, W.J., & Russo, M. (2003). Measuring rhythm: Is it separable from speech rate ? In A. Mettouchi & G. Ferr (Eds.), Actes de Interfaces Prosodiques (pp. 15-20). Nantes: Universit Nantes.
3. Bloch, B. (1950). Studies in colloquial Japanese IV: Phonemics. Language, 26, 86-125.
4. Bond, Z.S., & Stockmal, V. (2002). Distinguishing samples of spoken Korean from rhythmic and regional competitors. Language Sciences, 24, 175-185. (Pubitemid 41057028)
5. Caldwell, R. (1856 / 1976). A comparative grammar of the Dravidian or South-Indian family of languages. London / Madras: University of Madras Press.
6. Cassandro, M., Collet, P., Duarte, D., Galves, A., & Garcia, J. (2003). A universal linear relation among acoustic correlates of rhythm. Unpublished MS. Retrieved 29 October 2008, from http://www.ime.usp.br/ ∼tycho/participants/a-galves/linearity.pdf
7. Cho, M. (2004). Rhythm typology of Korean speech. Cognitive Process, 5, 249-253.
8. Classe, A. (1939). The rhythm of English prose. Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Condon, W.S., & Sander, L.W. (1974). Synchrony demonstrated between movements of the neonate and adult speech. Child Development, 45, 456-462.
10. Cutler, A. (1997). The syllable's role in the segmentation of stress languages. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 839-845. (Pubitemid 127467719)
11. Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1992). Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 218-236.
12. Cutler, A., Demuth, K., & McQueen, J.M. (2002). Universality versus language-specificity in listening to running speech. Psychological Science, 13, 258-262. (Pubitemid 41692298)
13. Cutler, A., Kim, J., & Otake, T. (2006). On the limits of L1 influence on non-L1 listening: Evidence from Japanese perception of Korean. In P. Warren & C. I. Watson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Australian International Conference on Speech Science & Technology. Auckland, New Zealand (CD-ROM).
14. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segu, J. (1983). A language-specific comprehension strategy. Nature, 304, 159-160.
15. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segu, J. (1986). The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 385-400.
16. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segu, J. (1992). The monolingual nature of speech segmentation by bilinguals. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 381-410.
17. Cutler, A., & Norris, D.G. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113-121.
18. Cutler, A., & Otake, T. (1994). Mora or phoneme? Further evidence for language-specific listening. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 824-844.
19. De Cornulier, B. (1982). Theorie du vers: Rimbaud, Verlaine, Mallarme. Paris: Seuil.
20. Demany, L., McKenzie, B., & Vurpillot, E. (1977). Rhythm perception in early infancy. Nature, 266, 718-719. (Pubitemid 8073798)
21. Derwing, B.L., & Nearey, T.M. (1994). Sound similarity judgments and segment prominence: A cross-linguistic study. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 94), (vol. 1, pp. 351-354 ).Yokohama, Japan. Retrieved 29 October 2008, from http://www.isca- speech.org/archive/icslp-1994/i94-0351.pdf
22. Derwing, B.L., & Wiebe, G. (1994). Syllable, mora or segment? Evidence from global sound similarity judgements in Japanese. In P. Koskinen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1994 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association (pp.155-163). Toronto: Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, Linguistic Graduate Course Union.
23. Deterding, D. (2001). The measurement of rhythm: A comparison of Singapore and British English. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 217-230.
24. Forster, K.I., & Forster, J.C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavioral Research: Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35, 116-124. (Pubitemid 37545055)
25. Frauenfelder, U.H., & Kearns, R.K. (1996). Sequence monitoring. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 665-673. (Pubitemid 126683343)
26. Gow, D.W., & Gordon, P.C. (1993). Coming to terms with stress: Effects of stress location in sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 545-578.
27. Grabe, E. (2002). Variation adds to prosodic typology. In B. Bel & I. Marlin (Eds.), Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2002 Conference (pp. 127-132). Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage.
28. Grabe, E., & Low, E.L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology VII (pp. 515-546). Berlin: Mouton.
29. Hoequist, C.E. (1983). Durational correlates of linguistic rhythm categories. Phonetica, 40, 19-31.
30. Keane, E. (2006). Rhythmic characteristics of colloquial and formal Tamil. Language and Speech, 49.
31. Kim, J., & Davis, C. (2006). Literacy acquisition in Korean Hangul. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp.3 77-387). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Kolinsky, R., Morais, J., & Cluytens, M. (1995). Intermediate representations in spoken word recognition: Evidence from word illusions. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 19-40.
33. Ladefoged, P. (1975). A course in phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
34. Lee, H., & Seong, C. (1996). Experimental phonetic study of the syllable duration of Korean with respect to the positional effect. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 96), (vol. 2, pp.1193-1196). Philadelphia. Retrieved 29 October 2008, from http://www.asel.udel.edu/icslp/cdrom/vol2/355/a355.pdf
35. Low, E.L., Grabe, E., & Nolan, F. (2000). Quantitative characterization of speech rhythm: Syllable-timing in Singapore English. Language and Speech, 43, 377-401.
36. McCann, D.R. (1976). The structure of the Korean Sijo. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 36, 114-134.
37. McQueen, J.M., Norris, D., & Cutler, A. (1994). Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 621-638.
38. Mehler, J., Dommergues, J.-Y., Frauenfelder, U., & Segu, J. (1981). The syllable's role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 298-305.
39. Morais, J., Kolinsky, R., & Nakamura, M. (1996). The psychological reality of speech units in Japanese. In T. Otake & A. Cutler (Eds.), Phonological structure and language processing: Cross-linguistic studies (pp.203-216). Berlin: Mouton.
40. Murty, L., Otake, T., & Cutler, A. (2007). Perceptual tests of rhythmic similarity. I: Mora rhythm. Language and Speech, 50, 77-99.
41. Nazzi, T., Bertoncini, J., & Mehler, J. (1998). Language discrimination by newborns: Towards an understanding of the role of rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 756-766. (Pubitemid 128457475)
42. Nazzi, T., & Ramus, F. (2003). Perception and acquisition of linguistic rhythm by infants, Speech Communication, 41, 233-243.
43. Nelson, D.L., & Nelson, L.D. (1970). Rated acoustic (articulatory) similarity for word pairs varying in number and ordinal position of common letters. Psychonomic Science, 19, 81-82.
44. Otake, T., Davis, S., & Cutler, A. (1995). Listeners' representations of within-word structure: A cross-linguistic and cross-dialectal investigation. Proceedings of EUROSPEECH 95 (vol. 3, pp. 1703-1706). Retrieved 29 October, 2008 from http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/eurospeech-1995/e95-1703.pdf
45. Otake, T., Hatano, G., Cutler, A., & Mehler, J. (1993). Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 258-278.
46. Otake, T., Hatano, G., & Yoneyama, K. (1996 a). Speech segmentation by Japanese listeners. In T. Otake & A. Cutler (Eds.), Phonological structure and language processing: Cross-linguistic studies (pp. 183-201). Berlin: Mouton.
47. Otake, T., Yoneyama, K., Cutler, A., & Van der Lugt, A. (1996). The representation of Japanese moraic nasals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 3831-3842. (Pubitemid 26422455)
48. Parker Jones, O. (2006). Durational variability and stress-timing in Hawaiian. In P. Warren, & C. I. Watson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Australian International Conference on Speech Science & Technology. Auckland, New Zealand (CD-ROM).
49. Pike, K.L. (1946). The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
50. Ramus, F. (1999). Rythme des langues et acquisition du langage [doctoral dissertation]. Paris: EHESS.
51. Ramus, F. (2002). Acoustic correlates of linguistic rhythm: Perspectives. In B. Bel & I. Marlin (Eds.), Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2002 Conference (pp.115-120). Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage.
52. Ramus, F., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73, 265-292.
53. Rutt, R. (1958). An introduction to Sijo: A form of short Korean poem. Transactions of the Korea Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 34, 7-11.
54. Sebastin-Galles, M., Dupoux, E., Segu, J., & Mehler, J. (1992). Contrasting syllabic effects in Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 18-32.
55. Shiba, S. (1973). Daravida-go to Nihongo (Dravidian languages and Japanese). Jinbun Ronsoo, 22, 19-53.
56. Stockmal, V., Moates, D.R., & Bond, Z.S. (2000). Same talker, different language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 383-393.
57. Taft, M. (1992). The body of the BOSS: Subsyllabic units in the lexical processing of polysyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1004-1014.
58. Treiman, R. (1985). Onsets and rimes as units of spoken syllables: Evidence from children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 161-181.
59. Vaissire, J. (1983). Language-independent prosodic features. In A. Cutler & D. R. Ladd (Eds.), Prosody: Models and measurements (pp. 53-66). Berlin: Springer.
60. Vroomen, J., Van Zon, M., & De Gelder, B. (1996). Cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperceptions and word spotting. Memory & Cognition, 24, 744-755. (Pubitemid 126448389)
61. White, L., Mattys, S.L., Series, L., & Gage, S. (2007). Rhythm metrics predict rhythmic discrimination. In J. Trouvain & W. J. Barry (Eds.), Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp.1 009-1012). Saarbrücken: Saarland University.
62. Yoon, Y.B., & Derwing, B.L. (1995). Syllable saliency in the perception of Korean words. In K. Elenius (Ed.), Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (vol. 2, pp. 602-605). Stockholm: KTH & Stockholm University.
63. Yoon, Y.B., & Derwing, B.L. (2001). A language without a rhyme: Syllable structure experiments in Korean. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 46, 187-237. (Pubitemid 33597391)
64. Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context on spoken-word processing. Cognition, 32, 25-64.