Can we use non-market valuation techniques in green national accounting applied to forests? sind bewertungsmethoden für nicht-marktfähige produkte des waldes in der ökologischen volkswirtschaftlichen gesamtrechnung anwendbar?

Austrian Journal of Forest Science

Volumn 126, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 53-76

  Campos, Pablo ^a   Caparrós, Alejandro ^a  

^a Institute of Public Goods and Policies   (Spain)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation; Environmental services; Exchange values; Forest green total income

Indexed keywords

AMENITY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; HOUSEHOLD INCOME; LANDOWNER; PRICE DYNAMICS; PUBLIC ACCESS; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; SUSTAINABILITY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN;

EID: 67949088037     PISSN: 03795292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anderson, T.L and McChesney, F.S. (2003) Introduction: Economic approach to property rights. In: Anderson, T.L and McChesney, F.S. (eds.). Property rights. Cooperation, conflict and law. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 1-11.
2. Bartelmus, P. (1998) The value of nature: valuation and evaluation in environmental accounting, in: Uno, K. and Bartelmus, P. (eds.), Environmental accounting in theory and practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, pp. 263-307.
3. Campos, P. (2000) An agroforestry account system. In: Jöbstl, H.A., Merlo, M. and Venzi, L (eds.), Institutional aspects of managerial and accounting in forestry. IUFRO and University of Viterbo, Viterbo, pp. 9-19.
4. Campos, P. and Caparrós, A. (2006) Social and private total Hicksian incomes of multiple use forests in Spain. Ecological Economics 57:545-557.
5. Campos, P. and Riera, P. (1996) Rentabilidad social de los bosques. Análisis aplicado a las dehesas y los montados ibéricos. Información Comercial Española 751:47-62.
6. Campos, P., Rodriguez, Y. and Caparrós, A. (2001) Towards the Dehesa total income accounting: theory and operative Monfragüe study cases. In-vestigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales (special issue on New Forestlands Economic Accounting: Theories and Applications) 1:45-69.
7. Campos, P., Caparrós A., and Oviedo, J.L (2007a) Comparing Payment-Vehicle Effects in Contingent Valuation Studies for Recreational Use in two Spanish Protected Forests. Journal of Leisure Research 39(1):60-85.
8. Campos, P., Bonnieux, R, Caparrós, A. and Paoli, J.C. (2007b) Measuring Total Sustainable Incomes from Multifunctional Management of Corsican Maritime Pine and Andalusian Cork Oak Mediterranean Forests. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50(1):65-85.
9. Campos, P., Oviedo J.L., Caparrós, A., Huntsinger, L. and Coelho, I. (2007c) How I love my woodlands; let me count the ways: a contingent valuation approach in Spain, Portugal and California. 15th Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (EAERE), 27-30 June. Tesalónica, Greece.
10. Campos, P., Daly-Hassen, H., Ovando, P., Oviedo, J.L and Chebil, A. (2008) Economics of cork oak forest multiple use: application to Jerez and Iteimia agroforestry systems study cases. In: Mosquera-Losada, M.R., Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A. and McAdam, J. (eds.), Agroforestry in Europe. Series Advances in Agroforestry 6. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 269-295.
11. Caparrós, A., Campos, P. and Montero, G., (2001) Applied multiple use forest accounting in the Guadarrama pinewoods (Spain). Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales. FS 1:93-110.
12. Caparrós, A., Campos, P. and Montero, G. (2003) An operative framework for total hicksian income measurement: application to a multiple use forest. Environmental and Resource Economics 26, pp. 173-198.
13. Eggertsson, T. (2003) Open access versus common property. In: Anderson, T.L and McChesney, F.S. (eds.), Property rights. Cooperation, conflict and law. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 73-89.
14. Eurostat (1996) European System of Accounts - ESA-95. ECSC-EC-EAEC, Luxembourg, 383 p.
15. Eurostat (2000) Manual on Economic Accounts for Agriculture and Forestry EAA/EAF 97 (Rev.1.1). European Communities, Luxembourg, 181 p.
16. Eurostat (2002) The European framework for integrated environmental and economic accounting for forests-IEEAF. European Communities, Luxembourg, 106 p.
17. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (1998) Economic and environmental accounting for forestry: Status and current efforts. Planning and Statistics Branch/Policy and Planning Division/Forestry Department. Rome. www.fao.org (03/16/2005).
18. Friend, A.M. (2000) Roots of green accounting in the classical and neoclassical schools. In: Simon, S. and Proops, J. (eds.). Greening the accounts. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (UK), pp. 32-51.
19. Hultkrantz, L. (1992) National Account of Timber and Forest Environmental Services in Sweden. Environmental and Resource Economics 2:283-305.
20. Kallio, T. (1999) Non-market benefits and forest owners' total utility in profitability calculations. In: Roper, C.S. and Park, A. (eds.). The living forest.
21. Non-market benefits of forestry. Forestry Commission, London, pp. 196-202.
22. Lange, G.M. (2004) Manual for environmental and economic accounts for forestry: a tool for cross-sectoral policy analysis. FAO Working Paper. Rome, 120 p.
23. Martin, W.E. and Jefferies, G.L (1966) Relating ranch prices and grazing permit values to ranch productivity. Journal of farm economics, 48(2):233-242.
24. Nordhaus, W. and Kokkelenberg, E.C. (eds.) (1999) Nature's numbers: expanding the national economic accounts to include the environment. National Academic Press, Washington, 250 p.
25. Pope, III, C.A. and Goodwind, H.L, Jr. (1984) Impacts of consumptive demand on rural land values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66(5):750-754.
26. Samuel, J. and Thomas, T. (1999) The valuation of unpriced forest products by private woodland owners in Wales. In: Roper, C.S. and Park, A. (eds.). The living forest. Non-market benefits of forestry. Forestry Commission, London, pp. 203-212.
27. Smith, A.H. and Martin, W.E. (1972) Socioeconomic behaviour of cattle ranchers, with implications for rural community development in the West. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 54(2):217-225.
28. Torell, L.A., Rimbe, N.N., Tanaka, J.A. and Bailey, S.A. (2001) The lack of a profit motive for ranching: implications for policy analysis. In: Torell, L.A., Barlett, T. and Larrañaga, R. (eds.), Current issues in rangeland resource economics. Annual meeting of the Society for Range Management. February 17-23. Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, pp. 47-58.
29. United Nations, Commission of the European Communities, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and World Bank (2003) Handbook of National Accounting. Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting 2003. http://unstats.un.org/ unsd/envAccounting/seea2003.pdf (08/24/2004).