Hip resurfacing using the trochanteric flip osteotomy

HIP International

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 131-135

  Killampalli, Vijay V ^a,d   Hayes, Andrew ^b   Parsons, Nick ^c   Costa, Mathew L ^c   Prakash, Udai ^b  

^a NEVILL HALL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS COVENTRY AND WARWICKSHIRE NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^d NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Resurfacing; Surgical approach; Trochateric Flip osteotomy

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; BONE SCREW; BURSITIS; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEBRIDEMENT; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOTOMY; HIP RESURFING ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MODIFIED UCLA ACTIVITY SCORE; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TROCHANTERIC FLIP OSTEOTOMY; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONVALESCENCE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOTOMY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOTOMY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REOPERATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67849126737     PISSN: 11207000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112070000901900209     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86-B: 177-84.
2. Shimmin AJ, Bare J, Back DL. Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005; 36: 187-93.
3. Little CP, Ruiz AL, Harding IJ, et al. Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 320-3.
4. Gautier E, Ganz K, Krugel N, et al. Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82: 679-83.
5. Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E, et al. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83: 1119-24.
6. Notzli HP, Siebenrock KA, Hempfing A, et al. Perfusion of the femoral head during surgical dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84: 300-4.
7. Amarasekera HW, Costa ML, Foguet P, et al. Blood flow to the femoral head during resurfacing arthroplasty: comparison of two approaches using LASER Doppler flowmetry. J Bone Joint Surg 2008; 90: 442-5.
8. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78: 185-90.
9. Kalairajah Y, Azurza K, Hulme C, et al. Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties: a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 1037-41.
10. Steffen R, O'Rourke K, Gill HS, et al. The anterolateral approach leads to less disruption of the femoral head-neck blood supply than the posterior approach during hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 1293-8.
11. Steffen RT, Smith SR, Urban JP, et al. The effect of hip resurfacing on oxygen concentration in the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 1468-74.
12. Khan A, Yates P, Lovering A, et al. The effect of surgical approach on blood flow to the femoral head during resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 21-5.