Ultrafast charge separation in multiexcited CdSe quantum dots mediated by adsorbed electron acceptors

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 131, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 2424-2425

  Matylitsky, Victor V ^a   Dworak, Lars ^a   Breus, Vladimir V ^b   Basche, Thomas ^b   Wachtveitl, Josef ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUGER RECOMBINATION; CDSE QDS; CDSE QUANTUM DOTS; CHARACTERISTIC TIME; CHARGE SEPARATIONS; COUPLED SYSTEMS; ELECTRON ACCEPTOR; ELECTRON STATE; ET PROCESS; EXCITATION INTENSITY; MOLECULAR ELECTRONS; PHOTOPHYSICS; TIME-RESOLVED; TRANSIENT ABSORBANCE; ULTRA-FAST; UV-VISIBLE;

CADMIUM ALLOYS; CADMIUM COMPOUNDS; ELECTRONS;

SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

CADMIUM SELENIDE; NANOPARTICLE; QUANTUM DOT;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; ENERGY TRANSFER; LIGHT ABSORPTION; OPTICAL DENSITY; PHOTOCHEMICAL QUENCHING; PHOTOLUMINESCENCE; SURFACE PROPERTY; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 67849125360     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja808084y     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Coe, S.; Woo, W.-K.; Bawendi, M.; Bulovic, V. Nature 2002, 420, 800-803.
2. Bertoni, C.; Gallardo, D.; Dunn, S.; Gaponik, N.; Eychmiiller, A. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 034107.
3. Steckel, J. S.; Coe-Sullivan, S.; Bulovic, V.; Bawendi, M. G. Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Germany) 2003, 75, 1862-1866.
4. Klimov, V. I.; Mikhailovsky, A. A.; Xu, S.; Malko, A.; Hollingsworth, J. A.; Leatherdale, C. A.; Eisler, H. J.; Bawendi, M. G. Science 2000, 290, 314-317.
5. Klimov, V. I.; Ivanov, S. A.; Nanda, J.; Achermann, M.; Bezel, I.; McGuire, J. A.; Piryatinski, A. Nature 2007, 447, 441-446.
6. Plass, R.; Pelet, S.; Krueger, J.; Gratzel, M.; Bach, U. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 706, 7578-7580.
7. Robel, I.; Subramanian, V.; Kuno, M.; Kamat, P. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2385-2393.
8. Schaller, R. D.; Klimov, V. I. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 186601.
9. O'Regan, B.; Gratzel, M. Nature 1991, 353, 737-740.
10. Nozik, A. J. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2001, 52, 193-231.
11. Nozik, A. J. Phys. E 2002, 14, 115-120.
12. Klimov, V. I. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2007, 58, 635-673.
13. Logunov, S.; Green, T.; Marguet, S.; El-Sayed, M. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 5652-5658.
14. Burda, C.; Green, T. C.; Link, S.; El-Sayed, M. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 1783-1788.
15. Burda, C.; Link, S.; Mohamed, M.; El-Sayed, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 12286-12292.
16. Matylitsky, V. V.; Shavel, A.; Gaponik, N.; Eychmuller, A.; Wachtveitl, J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 2703-2710.
17. Huang, J.; Stockwell, D.; Huang, Z. Q.; Mohler, D. L.; Lian, T. Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 5632-5633.
18. Dayal, S.; Burda, C. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2008, 7, 605-613.
19. Mahler, B.; Spinicelli, P.; Buil, S.; Quelin, X.; Hermier, J. P.; Dubertret, B. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 659-664.
20. For further explanations see Supporting Information.
21. Watanabe, T.; Honda, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 2617-2619.
22. Trinh, M. T.; Houtepen, A. J.; Schins, J. M.; Hanrath, T.; Piris, J.; Knulst, W.; Goossens, A.; Siebbeles, L. D. A. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 1713-1718.
23. Here exponential decrease of the photon flux in an optically dense sample was taken into account.
24. delay between 1.8 and 4.0 ps.