![]() |
Volumn 109, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 532-534
|
A randomized trial of the traditional sitting position versus the hamstring stretch position for labor epidural needle placement
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANESTHETIC AGENT;
ADULT;
ANESTHESIST;
ARTICLE;
BODY MASS;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA;
EPIDURAL CATHETER;
FEMALE;
HAMSTRING;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LABOR;
LORDOSIS;
OBSTETRIC ANALGESIA;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SITTING;
BODY POSTURE;
BONE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
EPIDURAL SPACE;
HISTOLOGY;
NEEDLE;
OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA;
PHYSIOLOGY;
PREGNANCY;
SPINE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ADULT;
ANESTHESIA, EPIDURAL;
ANESTHESIA, OBSTETRICAL;
BODY MASS INDEX;
BONE AND BONES;
EPIDURAL SPACE;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
NEEDLES;
POSTURE;
PREGNANCY;
SPINE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 67849121586
PISSN: 00032999
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ac6c79 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (15)
|
References (3)
|