The Sensitivity and Specificity of an Activity Monitor in Detecting Functional Activities in Young People With Cerebral Palsy

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 90, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1396-1401

  Mackey, Anna H ^a   Hewart, Penelope ^a   Walt, Sharon E ^a   Stott, N Susan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Ambulatory monitoring; Cerebral palsy; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMBULATORY MONITORING; ARTICLE; CEREBRAL PALSY; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MALE; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; RECUMBENCY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SITTING; STANDING; VALIDATION STUDY; WALKING;

ACCELERATION; ADOLESCENT; BIOMECHANICS; CEREBRAL PALSY; CHILD; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; NEW ZEALAND; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67849118325     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.01.029     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Mutch L., Alberman E., Hagberg B., Kodama K., and Perat M.V. Cerebral palsy epidemiology: where are we now and where are we going?. Dev Med Child Neurol 34 (1992) 547-551
2. Gage J.R. The treatment of gait problems in cerebral palsy (2004), MacKeith Press, London
3. Bjornson K.F., Belza B., Kartin D., Logsdon R., and McLaughlin J.F. Ambulatory physical activity performance in youth with cerebral palsy and youth who are developing typically. Phys Ther 87 (2007) 248-257
4. Berlin J.E., Storti K.L., and Brach J.S. Using activity monitors to measure physical activity in free-living conditions. Phys Ther 86 (2006) 1137-1145
5. de Vries S.I., Bakker I., Hopman-Rock M., Hirasing R.A., and van Mechelen W. Clinimetric review of motion sensors in children and adolescents. J Clin Epidemiol 59 (2006) 670-680
6. Anderson C.B., Hagstromer M., and Yngve A. Validation of the PDPAR as an adolescent diary: effect of accelerometer cut points. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37 (2005) 1224-1230
7. Kowalski K.C., Crocker P.R., and Kowalski N.P. Convergent validity of the physical activity questionnaire for adolescents. Pediatr Exerci Sci 9 (1997) 342-352
8. Troped P.J., Oliveira M.S., Matthews C.E., Cromley E.K., Melly S.J., and Craig B.A. Prediction of activity mode with global positioning system and accelerometer data. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40 (2008) 972-978
9. Zhang K., Werner P., Sun M., Pi-Sunyer F.X., and Boozer C.N. Measurement of human daily physical activity. Obes Res 11 (2003) 33-40
10. Huddleston J., Alaiti A., Goldvasser D., et al. Ambulatory measurement of knee motion and physical activity: preliminary evaluation of a smart activity monitor. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 3 (2006) 21
11. Marsh A.P., Vance R.M., Frederick T.L., Hesselmann S.A., and Rejeski W.J. Objective assessment of activity in older adults at risk for mobility disability. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39 (2007) 1020-1026
12. Saremi K., Marehbian J., Yan X., et al. Reliability and validity of bilateral thigh and foot accelerometry measures of walking in healthy and hemiparetic subjects. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 20 (2006) 297-305
13. Palisano R., Rosenbaum P., Walter S., Russell D., Wood E., and Galuppi B. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 39 (1997) 214-223
14. Hopkins W. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med 30 (2000) 1-15
15. Puyau M.R., Adolph A.L., Vohra F.A., and Butte N.F. Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. Obes Res 10 (2002) 150-157
16. Esliger D.W., and Tremblay M.S. Physical activity and inactivity profiling: the next generation. Can J Public Health 98 Suppl 2 (2007) S195-S207
17. Ince NF, Min C-H, Tewfik A, Vanderpool D. Detection of early morning daily activities with static home and wearable wireless sensors. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process. Available at: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/asp/2008/273130.abs.html. Accessed: July 18, 2009.