Robotics in gynecologic surgery

Minerva Ginecologica

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 187-199

  Frick, A C ^a   Falcone, T ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Genital diseases, female; Gynecologic surgical procedures; Robotics

Indexed keywords

VASOPRESSIN;

ABORTION; ADENOMYOSIS; ANASTOMOSIS; ARTERY INJURY; BLEEDING; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CAUTERIZATION; CELLULITIS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CRASH CART; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; ENDOMETRIOSIS; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; ERGONOMICS; EXPERIENCE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FEVER; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HEMATOMA; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INCISIONAL HERNIA; INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC ARTERY; INTESTINE INJURY; LAPAROSCOPE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; LITHOTOMY POSITION; MORBIDITY; MYOMECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVARY CANCER; PATIENT POSITIONING; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE VOMITING; PREGNANCY RATE; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; RECTOCELE; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROBOTICS; SUPINE POSITION; SURGEON; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SUTURE; TACHYCARDIA; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERUS MYOMA; UTERUS PROLAPSE; VAGINAL VAULT PROLAPSE; VIDEORECORDER; WOUND DEHISCENCE;

ANIMALS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; FEMALE UROGENITAL DISEASES; GENITAL DISEASES, FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67849116624     PISSN: 00264784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Satava RM. Robotic surgery: from past to future a personal journey. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:1491-1500
2. Margossian H, Garcia-Ruiz A, Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Attaran M, Gagner M. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical uterine horn anastomosis. Fertil Steril 1998;70:530-534 (Pubitemid 28435640)
3. Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Margossian H, Stevens L. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: A human pilot study. Fertil Steril 2000;73:1040-2. (Pubitemid 30227533)
4. Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Morrow B, Podgornik MN, Brett KM et al. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the united states, 2000-2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:34.e1-34.e7.
5. Reich H, Decaprio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg 1989;5:213.
6. Diaz-Arrastia C, Jurnalov C, Gomez G, Townsend C Jr. Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1271-1273 (Pubitemid 34988731)
7. Advincula AP, Reynolds RK. The use of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy in the patient with a scarred or obliterated anterior cul-de-sac. JSLS 2005;9:287-91.
8. Reynolds RK, Advincula AP. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: Technique and initial experience. Am J Surg 2006;191:555-560
9. Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizing a robotic surgical system. JSLS 2005;9:13-15
10. Fiorentino RP, Zepeda MA, Goldstein BH, John CR, Rettenmaier MA. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006;13:60-63
11. Kho RM, Hilger WS, Hentz JG, Magtibay PM, Magrina JF. Robotic hysterectomy: Technique and initial outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:113.e1-113.e4.
12. Payne TN, Dauterive FR. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: Surgical outcomes in a community practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15:286-291
13. Palomba S, Zupi E, Falbo A, Russo T, Marconi D, Tolino A et al. A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: reproductive outcomes. Fertil Steril 2007;88:933-941 (Pubitemid 47498380)
14. Seracchioli R, Rossi S, Govoni F, Rossi E, Venturoli S, Bulletti C et al. Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: a randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy. Hum Reprod 2000;15:2663-2668 (Pubitemid 32000527)
15. Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, Mascia M, Solla E, Melis GB. Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: A prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:654-658 (Pubitemid 26070160)
16. Advincula AP, Falcone T. Laparoscopic robotic gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2004;31:599-609. (Pubitemid 39164178)
17. Advincula AP, Xu X, Goudeau S 4th, Ransom SB. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:698-705. (Pubitemid 350008145)
18. Nezhat C, Lavie O, Hsu S, Watson J, Barnett O, Lemyre M. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy-a retrospective matched control study. Fertil Steril 2009;91:556-559
19. Divers WA Jr. Characteristics of women requesting reversal of sterilization. Fertil Steril 1984;41:233-236
20. Spivak MM, Librach CL, Rosenthal DM. Microsurgical reversal of sterilization: A six-year study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;154:355-361
21. Sacks G, Trew G. Reconstruction, destruction and IVF: dilemmas in the art of tubal surgery. BJOG 2004;111:1174-1181 (Pubitemid 39472162)
22. Dubuisson JB, Chapron C, Nos C, Morice P, Aubriot FX, Gamier P. Sterilization reversal: fertility results. Hum Reprod 1995;10:1145-1151
23. Trussell J, Guilbert E, Hedley A. Sterilization failure, sterilization reversal, and pregnancy after sterilization reversal in Quebec. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:677-684 (Pubitemid 36390055)
24. Margossian H, Garcia-Ruiz A, Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Attaran M, Miller JH et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis in a porcine model: a pilot study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1998;8:69-73. (Pubitemid 28267702)
25. Falcone T, Goldberg J, Garcia-Ruiz A, Margossian H, Stevens L. Full robotic assistance for laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: A case report. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1999;9:107-113 (Pubitemid 29136038)
26. Rodgers AK, Goldberg JM, Hammel JP, Falcone T. Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient minilaparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:1375-1380 (Pubitemid 46869877)
27. Dharia Patel SP, Steinkampf MP, Whitten SJ, Malizia BA. Robotic tubal anastomosis: surgical technique and cost effectiveness. Fertil Steril 2008;90:1175-1179
28. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:805-823 (Pubitemid 40458813)
29. Di Marco DS, Chow GK, Gettman MT, Elliott DS. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Urology 2004;63:373-6.
30. Elliott DS, Frank I, Dimarco DS, Chow GK. Gynecologic use of robotically assisted laparoscopy: sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high-grade vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Surg 2004;188:52S-6S. (Pubitemid 39336473)
31. Elliott DS, Krambeck AE, Chow GK. Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse. J Urol 2006;176:655-659 (Pubitemid 43927873)
32. Daneshgari F, Kefer JC, Moore C, Kaouk J. Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolaspe (POP): Utilizing POP-quantification-based staging and outcomes. BJU Int 2007;100:875-879 (Pubitemid 47360195)
33. Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:1201-1206
34. Sotelo R, Mariano MB, Garcia-Segui A, Dubois R, Spaliviero M, Keklikian W et al. Laparoscopic repair of vesicovaginal fistula. J Urol 2005;173:1615-1618
35. Nezhat CH, Nezhat F, Nezhat C, Rottenberg H. Laparoscopic repair of a vesicovaginal fistula: a case report. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:899-901. (Pubitemid 24154874)
36. Chibber PJ, Shah HN, Jain P. Laparoscopic O'Conor's repair for vesico-vaginal and vesico-uterine fistulae. BJU Int 2005;96:183-186 (Pubitemid 40942894)
37. Melamud O, Eichel L, Turbow B, Shanberg A. Laparoscopic vesicovaginal fistula repair with robotic reconstruction. Urology 2005;65:163-166 (Pubitemid 40169626)
38. Sundaram BM, Kalidasan G, Hemal AK. Robotic repair of vesicovaginal fistula: Case series of five patients. Urology 2006;67:970-973 (Pubitemid 43956415)
39. Hemal AK, Kolla SB, Wadhwa P. Robotic reconstruction for recurrent supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistulas J Urol 2008;180:981-985
40. Marchai F, Rauch P, Vandromme J, Laurent I, Lobontiu A, Ahcel B et al. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign and oncologic pathologies: initial clinical experience with 30 patients. Surg Endosc 2005;19:826-831 (Pubitemid 41215987)
41. Reynolds RK, Burke WM, Advincula AP. Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic staging of gynecologic malignancies. JSLS 2005;9:149-158
42. Veljovich DS, Paley PJ, Drescher CW, Everett EN, Shah C, Peters WA 3rd. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: Program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:679-e1,9; discussion 679.e9-10 (Pubitemid 351758921)
43. DeNardis SA, Holloway RW, Bigsby GE 4th, Pikaart DP, Ahmad S, Finkler NJ. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008;111:412-417
44. Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Richardson DL, Valmadre S, Carlson M, Phillips GS et al. Robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:1207-1213
45. Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle AW, Hunt S. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol 2008;111:407-411
46. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN et al. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: Robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:360.e1,360.e9.
47. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN et al. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:357.e1,357.e7.
48. Ko EM, Muto MG, Berkowitz RS, Feltmate CM. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: A comparative study at a single institution. Gynecol Oncol 2008,111:425-430
49. Sert B, Abeler V. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases, the future is now? Int J Med Robot 2007;3:224-228 (Pubitemid 350033311)
50. Nezhat FR, Datta MS, Liu C, Chuang L, Zakashansky K. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS 2008;12:227-237
51. Fanning J, Fenton B, Purohit M. Robotic radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:649.e1-649.e4.
52. Kim YT, Kim SW, Hyung WJ, Lee SJ, Nam EJ, Lee WJ. Robotic radical hysterectomy with the pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 2008;108:412-416