Do endoscopy capsules interfere with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators?

Endoscopy

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 457-461

  Bandorski, D ^a   Irnich, W ^b   Bruck M ^a   Kramer, W ^a   Jakobs, R ^c  

^a Klinikum Wetzlar Medizinische Klinik 1   (Germany)

^b JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c KLINIKUM LUDWIGSHAFEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEFIBRILLATOR; DRUG CONTRAINDICATION; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; PILOT STUDY; PROSTHESIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; DEFIBRILLATORS, IMPLANTABLE; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 67849114553     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1214610     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ell C, Remke S, May A et al. The first prospective controlled trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in chronic gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 685-689 (Pubitemid 34965667)
2. Lewis BS, Swain P. Capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of patients with suspected small intestinal bleeding. Results of a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 349-353
3. Neu B, Ell C, May A et al. Capsule endoscopy versus standard testing influencing management of obscure digestive bleeding: results from a German multicenter trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 1736-1742 (Pubitemid 41648427)
4. Eliakim R, Fireman Z, Gralnek IM et al. Evaluation of the PillCam COLON Capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter, prospective, comparative study. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 963-970 (Pubitemid 44641499)
5. Schoofs N, Deviére J, van Gossum A. PillCam COLON Capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy for colorectal tumor diagnosis: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 971-977 (Pubitemid 44615230)
6. Dubner S, Dubner Y, Rubio H, Goldin E. Electromagnetic interference from wireless video-capsule endoscopy on implantable cardioverterdefibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2007; 30: 472-475 (Pubitemid 46596122)
7. Bandorski D, Irnich W, Brück M et al. Capsule endoscopy and cardiac pacemakers: investigation for possible interference. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 36-39 (Pubitemid 351201541)
8. Irnich W. Störbeeinflussung von implantierten Schrittmachern und Defibrillatoren. Herzschr Elektrophys 2004; 15: 9-21 (Pubitemid 38667733)
9. Irnich W, Batz L, Müller R, Tobisch R. Electromagnetic interference of pacemakers by mobile phones. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996; 19: 1431-1446 (Pubitemid 26337438)
10. CEN/CENELEC (Commission Européenne de Normalisation/Commission Européenne de Normalisation Electrotechnique et Electronique). EN 45502-2-1: 2004: Active implantable medical devices Part 2-1: Particular requirements for active implantable medical devices intended to treat bradyarrhythmia (cardiac pacemakers). Central Secretariat: rue de Stassart 35, B - 1050 Brussels
11. Leighton JA, Srivathsan K, Carey EJ et al. Safety of wirless capsule endoscopy in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 1728-1731 (Pubitemid 41648425)
12. Pelargonio G, Dello Russo A, Pace M et al. Use of video capsule endoscopy in a patient with an implantable cardiac defibrillator. Europace 2006; 8: 1062-1063 (Pubitemid 44896803)
13. Bandorski D, Diehl KL, Jaspersen D. Kapselendoskopie bei Herzschrittmacher- Patienten: aktueller Stand in Deutschland. Z Gastroenterol 2005; 43: 715-718 (Pubitemid 41233458)
14. Barbaro V, Bartolini P, Donato A, Militello C. Eletromagnetic interference of pacemakers by mobile phones. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996; 19: 1410-1418 (Pubitemid 26337436)
15. Dubner S, Dubner Y, Gallino S et al. Electromagnetic interference with implantable cardiac pacemakers by video capsule. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 250-254 (Pubitemid 40261074)