Inland barge services and container transport: The case of the ports of Le Havre and Marseille in the European context

CyberGeo

Volumn 2009, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Frémont, Antoine ^a   Franc, Pierre ^a   Slack, Brian ^b  

^a logistique et organisation des transports   (France)

^b Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

Author keywords

Container; Europe; Inland navigation; Intermodal transportation; Network configuration; Port

Indexed keywords

BARGE; CONTAINER SHIP; PORT; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ANTWERP [BELGIUM]; BELGIUM; BENELUX; BOUCHES DU RHONE; EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; HAUTE NORMANDIE; LE HAVRE; MARSEILLES; NETHERLANDS; PROVENCE-ALPES-COTE D'AZUR; ROTTERDAM; SEINE MARITIME; SOUTH HOLLAND; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 67849113986     PISSN: 12783366     EISSN: 12783366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4000/cybergeo.21743     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ADEME (Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l'Energie), 2006, Transports combinés railroute, fleuve-route et mer-route. Tableau de bord national 2006. Sophia Antipolis.
2. BLUMENHAGEN, D., 1981, Containerisation and Hinterland Traffic. Maritime Policy and Management, 8 (3), 197-206.
3. BROOKS, M.R., 2000, Sea Change in liner shipping, Oxford, Pergamon, 283p.
4. CNT (Conseil National des Transports), 1999, Propositions pour une amélioration des dessertes portuaires. Paris.
5. CNT (Conseil National des Transports), 2005, Rapport sur le transport combiné. Paris.
6. CULLINANE, K., KHANNA, M., 2000, Economies of scale in large containerships: optimal size and geographical implications, Journal of Transport Geography, 8, 181-195.
7. DUCRUET, C., LEE, S.W., 2007, Measuring intermodalism at European port cities: an employmentbased study, World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, 1(3), 313-334. ECMT (European Conference of Ministers of Transport), 2006a, Inland Waterways and Environmental Protection. OECD: Paris.
8. ECMT (European Conference of Ministers of Transport), 2006a, Inland Waterways and Environmental Protection. OECD: Paris.
9. ECMT (European Conference of Ministers of Transport), 2006b, Strengthening Inland Waterway Transport. Pan-European Co-operation for Progress. OECD: Paris
10. GOUVERNAL, E., 2003, Les lignes maritimes et le transport terrestre : quels enseignements peut-on tirer du cas Rail Link ? Les cahiers scientifiques du transport, 44, 95-113.
11. HAYUTH, Y., 1981, Containerization and the Load Center Concept, Economic Geography, 57 (2), 160-176.
12. HAYUTH, Y., 1992, "Multimodal Freight Transport", in: B. Hoyle and R. Knowles, Modern Transport Geography, London, Belhaven, 200-214.
13. HEAVER, T. D., 2002, "Supply Chain and Logistics Management", in Grammenos C. Th. Editor, The Handbook of Maritime Economics and Business, LLP Professional Publishing, Londres, Hong Kong, 375-396.
14. KONINGS, R., 2002, Network design for intermodal barge transport, Transportation Research Record, Vol.1820, 17-25.
15. KONINGS, R., 2006, Hub and spoke networks in container on barge transport, paper presented at the TRB meeting, 2006.
16. LANGEN DE, P.W., CHOULY, A., 2004, Régimes portuaire et accès à l'arrière-pays, Les Cahiers scientifiques du Transport, 44, 77-94.
17. NIERAT, P., (1997), "Market area of rail-truck terminals: pertinence of the spatial theory", Transportation Research, 31A (2), 109-127.
18. NOTTEBOOM, T., 2001, Spatial and functional integration of container port systems and hinterland networks in Europe, in ECMT (ed.), Land access to sea ports, Economic Research Centre ECMTOECD, Paris, 5-55.
19. NOTTEBOOM, T., 2002, The interdependance between liner shipping network and intermodal network, paper presented at the International Association of Maritime Economics, Panama 2002.
20. NOTTEBOOM, T., 2004, A carrier's perspective on container network configuration at sea and on land, Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 1 (2), 65-87.
21. NOTTEBOOM, T., 2006, Container barge networks in Europe: outgrowing the Rhine basin, in: Maritime Transport 3, pp. 277-295.
22. NOTTEBOOM, T., KONINGS, R., 2004, Network dynamics in container transport by barge, Belgéo, 4, 461-478.
23. th WCTR Proceedings, Pergamon, 57-71.
24. NOTTEBOOM, T., WU, J., 2006, The barge service network on the Yangtze River in an era of strong container growth, in: Notteboom, T. (Ed.) Ports are More than Piers, 363-378.
25. PANAYIDES, P.M., CULLINANE, K., 2002, Competitive advantage in liner shipping: a review and research agenda, International Journal of Maritime Economics, 4, 189-209.
26. ROBINSON, R., 2002, Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm, Maritime Policy and Management, 29 (3), 241-255.
27. SLACK, B., 1999, Satellite terminals: a local solution to hub congestion? Journal of Transport Geography, 7, 241-246.
28. TAAFFE, E.J., MORRILL, R.L., GOULD, P.R., 1963, Transport expansion in underdeveloped countries: a comparative analysis, Geographical Review,53(4), 503-529.
29. VAN DER HORST, M.R., DE LANGEN, P.W., 2008, Coordination in hinterland transport chains: a major challenge for the seaport community, Journal of Maritime Economics & Logistics, 10, 108-129.
30. VAN KLINK, H.A., VAN DER BERG, G.C., 1998, Gateways and intermodalism? Journal of Transport Geography, 6 (1), 1-9.
31. VAN SLOBBE, R., 2002, Larger volumes, increasing scale, environmental aspects and road congestion require intermodal solutions, unpublished presentation, ITMMAPS Conference, Antwerp, April 18-20, 2002.
32. VELLENGA, DB., SEMEJIN, J., VELLENGA, DR., 1999, One-stop shopping for logistics services : a review of the evidence and implications for multi-modal companies. Journal of Transportation Management, 3,31-58.
33. ZURBACH, V. (2005), Transport de conteneurs sur le Rhin : Quelles logiques de fonctionnement ? Rapport de Master Recherche « Transports », Université de Paris 12, année 2004-2005, 76 p.